Xian Guan

Dr. Xian Guan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 February 2025 in Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XGXian Guan
Xian Guan
JBJing Bai
Jing Bai
XYXingzhong Yuan
Xingzhong Yuan
HWHui Wang
Hui Wang
YLYing Li
Ying Li
YZYanlan Zhao
Yanlan Zhao

28 October 2025 in Fire
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XGXian Guan
Xian Guan
LXLiang Xie
Liang Xie
EGEnping Guo
Enping Guo
YCYanxiang Chen
Yanxiang Chen
This study presents a fire risk assessment of traditional wooden dwellings in Southern Hunan, focusing on Zhoujia Compound—a nationally protected cultural heritage site. By applying Pyrosim fire simulation software, we modeled fire spread, smoke dispersion, and temperature variation under localized architectural and environmental conditions. The simulations, informed by real-time wind speed monitoring, revealed that key fire risks stem from open flame activities during festivals, charcoal heating, and inadequate electrical wiring. Structural features such as interconnected wooden beams and open courtyards exacerbate fire spread. The results identified high-risk zones and demonstrated that wind speed and building orientation significantly affect fire dynamics. Based on these findings, we propose targeted fire prevention strategies, including fire-retardant treatments, improved compartmentalization, and community-level fire education. This research offers a novel, simulation-based approach to improving fire safety in traditional villages, contributing to both cultural heritage protection and rural fire risk mitigation.

1 September 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XGXian Guan
Xian Guan
XLXiao-Wen Liu
Xiao-Wen Liu
YSYanan Shao
Yanan Shao
HXHongjuan Xie
Hongjuan Xie
LJLan Jiang
Lan Jiang
Shallow wetlands retain metals and metalloids from industrial, mining, agricultural, urban, and atmospheric sources; however, shallow water columns, active sediment–water exchange, and recurrent wetting–drying also favor remobilization. This critical narrative review evaluates physical, chemical, biological, and ecological engineering approaches for metal-contaminated shallow wetlands, focusing on the hydrological and biogeochemical conditions governing performance. Evidence was differentiated among natural or semi-natural wetlands, engineered wetland analogues, and transferable studies of contaminated sediments, soils, or wastewaters. Physical interventions rapidly control localized sediment inventories but can disturb habitats and redistribute particles. Chemical amendments reduce porewater concentrations and bioavailability, although durability depends on pH, redox conditions, dissolved organic matter, and competing ions. Biological and ecological engineering approaches can support ecological function recovery, but performance depends on plant traits, microbial processes, hydroperiod, and maintenance. No intervention was consistently superior across site conditions and outcome domains. Within this framework, sustainability is evaluated through durable risk reduction, ecological function recovery, life-cycle feasibility, responsible residual management, and accountable long-term stewardship. The reviewed mechanistic and conceptual evidence supports considering site-specific treatment trains, although direct comparative field evidence demonstrating their superiority over individual interventions remains limited. Future studies should prioritize hydrologically realistic field validation, standardized flux and bioavailability endpoints, mixed-contaminant scenarios, life-cycle assessment, and explicit measurement of ecological function recovery.