Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska

Prof. Dr. Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 October 2017 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKyriaki Michailidou
Kyriaki Michailidou
SLSara Lindström
Sara Lindström
JDJoe Dennis
Joe Dennis
JBJonathan Beesley
Jonathan Beesley
SHShirley Hui
Shirley Hui
DEDouglas F. Easton
Douglas F. Easton
Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci, predicts target genes for known risk loci and demonstrates a strong overlap with somatic driver genes in breast tumours. Genome-wide association studies for breast cancer have identified common genetic variation that influences susceptibility to this disease, but much of the genetic risk remains unexplained. Doug Easton and colleagues report a genome-wide association study for breast cancer in more than 122,000 cases and 105,000 controls. The authors genotyped a subset of these cases using OncoArray, a new, custom genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array for cancer genomics. Overall, they identify 65 loci newly associated with breast cancer susceptibility, and estimate that, together with 107 previously identified breast cancer susceptibility loci, these explain about 18 per cent of the familial relative risk of breast cancer. Polygenic risk scores may be used in risk prediction models and may improve early detection and targeted prevention of the disease. Breast cancer risk is influenced by rare coding variants in susceptibility genes, such as BRCA1, and many common, mostly non-coding variants. However, much of the genetic contribution to breast cancer risk remains unknown. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study of breast cancer in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry and 14,068 cases and 13,104 controls of East Asian ancestry1. We identified 65 new loci that are associated with overall breast cancer risk at P < 5 × 10−8. The majority of credible risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms in these loci fall in distal regulatory elements, and by integrating in silico data to predict target genes in breast cells at each locus, we demonstrate a strong overlap between candidate target genes and somatic driver genes in breast tumours. We also find that heritability of breast cancer due to all single-nucleotide polymorphisms in regulatory features was 2–5-fold enriched relative to the genome-wide average, with strong enrichment for particular transcription factor binding sites. These results provide further insight into genetic susceptibility to breast cancer and will improve the use of genetic risk scores for individualized screening and prevention.

18 May 2020 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HZHaoyu Zhang
Haoyu Zhang
TAThomas U. Ahearn
Thomas U. Ahearn
JLJulie Lecarpentier
Julie Lecarpentier
JBJonathan Beesley
Jonathan Beesley
GQGuanghao Qi
Guanghao Qi
MGMontserrat García-Closas
Montserrat García-Closas

23 October 2017 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AIABCTB Investigators
ABCTB Investigators
RMRoger L Milne
Roger L Milne
EMEmbrace
Embrace
GCGEMO Study Collaborators
GEMO Study Collaborators
HEHebon
Hebon
JSJacques Simard
Jacques Simard
Roger Milne and colleagues conduct a genome-wide association study for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer combined with BRCA1 mutation carriers in a large cohort. They identify ten new risk variants and find high genetic correlation between breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers and risk of ER-negative breast cancer in the general population. Most common breast cancer susceptibility variants have been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of predominantly estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease1. We conducted a GWAS using 21,468 ER-negative cases and 100,594 controls combined with 18,908 BRCA1 mutation carriers (9,414 with breast cancer), all of European origin. We identified independent associations at P < 5 × 10−8 with ten variants at nine new loci. At P < 0.05, we replicated associations with 10 of 11 variants previously reported in ER-negative disease or BRCA1 mutation carrier GWAS and observed consistent associations with ER-negative disease for 105 susceptibility variants identified by other studies. These 125 variants explain approximately 16% of the familial risk of this breast cancer subtype. There was high genetic correlation (0.72) between risk of ER-negative breast cancer and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers. These findings may lead to improved risk prediction and inform further fine-mapping and functional work to better understand the biological basis of ER-negative breast cancer.

18 June 2018 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNbcs Collaborators
Nbcs Collaborators
LWLang Wu
Lang Wu
KIkConFab/AOCS Investigators
kConFab/AOCS Investigators
WSWei Shi
Wei Shi
JLJirong Long
Jirong Long
WZWei Zheng
Wei Zheng
The breast cancer risk variants identified in genome-wide association studies explain only a small fraction of the familial relative risk, and the genes responsible for these associations remain largely unknown. To identify novel risk loci and likely causal genes, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study evaluating associations of genetically predicted gene expression with breast cancer risk in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry. We used data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project to establish genetic models to predict gene expression in breast tissue and evaluated model performance using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Of the 8,597 genes evaluated, significant associations were identified for 48 at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 5.82 × 10−6, including 14 genes at loci not yet reported for breast cancer. We silenced 13 genes and showed an effect for 11 on cell proliferation and/or colony-forming efficiency. Our study provides new insights into breast cancer genetics and biology.

7 January 2020 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GCGEMO Study Collaborators
GEMO Study Collaborators
LFLaura Fachal
Laura Fachal
ECEmbrace Collaborators
Embrace Collaborators
KIKConFab Investigators
KConFab Investigators
HIHEBON Investigators
HEBON Investigators
ADAlison M. Dunning
Alison M. Dunning

25 January 2019 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XJXia Jiang
Xia Jiang
HFHilary K. Finucane
Hilary K. Finucane
FSFredrick Schumacher
Fredrick Schumacher
SSStephanie L. Schmit
Stephanie L. Schmit
JTJonathan P. Tyrer
Jonathan P. Tyrer
SLSara Lindstroem
Sara Lindstroem
Quantifying the genetic correlation between cancers can provide important insights into the mechanisms driving cancer etiology. Using genome-wide association study summary statistics across six cancer types based on a total of 296,215 cases and 301,319 controls of European ancestry, here we estimate the pair-wise genetic correlations between breast, colorectal, head/neck, lung, ovary and prostate cancer, and between cancers and 38 other diseases. We observed statistically significant genetic correlations between lung and head/neck cancer (rg = 0.57, p = 4.6 × 10−8), breast and ovarian cancer (rg = 0.24, p = 7 × 10−5), breast and lung cancer (rg = 0.18, p =1.5 × 10−6) and breast and colorectal cancer (rg = 0.15, p = 1.1 × 10−4). We also found that multiple cancers are genetically correlated with non-cancer traits including smoking, psychiatric diseases and metabolic characteristics. Functional enrichment analysis revealed a significant excess contribution of conserved and regulatory regions to cancer heritability. Our comprehensive analysis of cross-cancer heritability suggests that solid tumors arising across tissues share in part a common germline genetic basis.