Gao Sheng

Mr. Gao Sheng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 June 2023 in Gut Microbes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GSGao Sheng
Gao Sheng
XGXiang Gao
Xiang Gao
Ruixin ZhuRuixin Zhu
Ruixin Zhu
DWDingfeng Wu
Dingfeng Wu
ZFZhongsheng Feng
Zhongsheng Feng
LZLixin Zhu
Lixin Zhu
Dysbiosis of gut microbial community is associated with the pathogenesis of CD and may serve as a promising noninvasive diagnostic tool. We aimed to compare the performances of the microbial markers of different biological levels by conducting a multidimensional analysis on the microbial metagenomes of CD. We collected fecal metagenomic datasets generated from eight cohorts that altogether include 870 CD patients and 548 healthy controls. Microbial alterations in CD patients were assessed at multidimensional levels including species, gene, and SNV level, and then diagnostic models were constructed using artificial intelligence algorithm. A total of 227 species, 1047 microbial genes, and 21,877 microbial SNVs were identified that differed between CD and controls. The species, gene, and SNV models achieved an average AUC of 0.97, 0.95, and 0.77, respectively. Notably, the gene model exhibited superior diagnostic capability, achieving an average AUC of 0.89 and 0.91 for internal and external validations, respectively. Moreover, the gene model was specific for CD against other microbiome-related diseases. Furthermore, we found that phosphotransferase system (PTS) contributed substantially to the diagnostic capability of the gene model. The outstanding performance of PTS was mainly explained by genes celB and manY, which demonstrated high predictabilities for CD with metagenomic datasets and was validated in an independent cohort by qRT-PCR analysis. Our global metagenomic analysis unravels the multidimensional alterations of the microbial communities in CD and identifies microbial genes as robust diagnostic biomarkers across geographically and culturally distinct cohorts.

27 August 2023 in Gut Microbes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WGWenxing Gao
Wenxing Gao
XGXiang Gao
Xiang Gao
LZLixin Zhu
Lixin Zhu
GSGao Sheng
Gao Sheng
RSRuicong Sun
Ruicong Sun
NJNa Jiao
Na Jiao
Microbial signatures show remarkable potentials in predicting colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic powers of multimodal microbial signatures, multi-kingdom species, genes, and single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) for detecting precancerous adenomas. We performed cross-cohort analyses on whole metagenome sequencing data of 750 samples via xMarkerFinder to identify adenoma-associated microbial multimodal signatures. Our data revealed that fungal species outperformed species from other kingdoms with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.71 in distinguishing adenomas from controls. The microbial SNVs, including dark SNVs with synonymous mutations, displayed the strongest diagnostic capability with an AUC value of 0.89, sensitivity of 0.79, specificity of 0.85, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.74. SNV biomarkers also exhibited outstanding performances in three independent validation cohorts (AUCs = 0.83, 0.82, 0.76; sensitivity = 1.0, 0.72, 0.93; specificity = 0.67, 0.81, 0.67, MCCs = 0.69, 0.83, 0.72) with high disease specificity for adenoma. In further support of the above results, functional analyses revealed more frequent inter-kingdom associations between bacteria and fungi, and abnormalities in quorum sensing, purine and butanoate metabolism in adenoma, which were validated in a newly recruited cohort via qRT-PCR. Therefore, these data extend our understanding of adenoma-associated multimodal alterations in the gut microbiome and provide a rationale of microbial SNVs for the early detection of CRC.

23 July 2018 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WRWeiquan Ren
Weiquan Ren
GSGao Sheng
Gao Sheng
HZHuimin Zhang
Huimin Zhang
YRYinglu Ren
Yinglu Ren
XYXue Yu
Xue Yu
WWwei wang
wei wang
Qishen granules (QSG) have beneficial therapeutic effects for heart failure, but the effects of decomposed recipes, including Wenyang Yiqi Huoxue (WYH) and Qingre Jiedu (QJ), are not clear. In this study, the efficacy of WYH and QJ on heart failure is evaluated by using transverse aortic constriction (TAC) induced mice and the significantly changed genes in heart tissues were screened with a DNA array. Furthermore, a new quantitative pathway analysis tool is developed to evaluate the differences of pathways in different groups and to identify the pharmacological contributions of the decomposed recipes. Finally, the related genes in the significantly changed pathways are verified by a real-time polymerase chain reaction and a Western blot. Our data show that both QJ and WYH improve the left ventricular ejection fraction, which explain their contributions to protect against heart failure. In the energy metabolism, QJ achieves the therapeutic effects of QSG through nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt)-mediated mechanisms. In ventricular remodeling and inflammation reactions, QJ and WYH undertake the therapeutic effects through 5′-nucleotidase ecto (Nt5e)-mediated mechanisms. Together, QJ and WYH constitute the therapeutic effects of QSG and play important roles in myocardial energy metabolism and inflammation, which can exert therapeutic effects for heart failure.

5 June 2026 in Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XSXiaoqian Sun
Xiaoqian Sun
HWHuijuan Wang
Huijuan Wang
YWYukai Wan
Yukai Wan
YGYuanyuan Gu
Yuanyuan Gu
MYMin Yang
Min Yang
GSGao Sheng
Gao Sheng

1 January 2020 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJian Zhang
Jian Zhang
JLJunjie Liu
Junjie Liu
GSGao Sheng
Gao Sheng
WLWeili Lin
Weili Lin
PGPengrong Gao
Pengrong Gao
YWyong wang
yong wang
In the article titled “Antiapoptosis and Antifibrosis Effects of Qishen Granules on Heart Failure Rats via Hippo Pathway” [1], there was an error in Section 2.5 “Measurement of Serum Biochemical Markers” of the article body. Section 2.5 “Measurement of Serum Biochemical Markers” should be updated as follows: