Olivia Fletcher

Prof. Olivia Fletcher

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 June 2007 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DEDouglas F. Easton
Douglas F. Easton
KPKaren A. Pooley
Karen A. Pooley
ADAlison M. Dunning
Alison M. Dunning
PPPaul D. P. Pharoah
Paul D. P. Pharoah
DTDeborah Thompson
Deborah Thompson
BPBruce A. J. Ponder
Bruce A. J. Ponder

23 October 2017 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKyriaki Michailidou
Kyriaki Michailidou
SLSara Lindström
Sara Lindström
JDJoe Dennis
Joe Dennis
JBJonathan Beesley
Jonathan Beesley
SHShirley Hui
Shirley Hui
DEDouglas F. Easton
Douglas F. Easton
Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci, predicts target genes for known risk loci and demonstrates a strong overlap with somatic driver genes in breast tumours. Genome-wide association studies for breast cancer have identified common genetic variation that influences susceptibility to this disease, but much of the genetic risk remains unexplained. Doug Easton and colleagues report a genome-wide association study for breast cancer in more than 122,000 cases and 105,000 controls. The authors genotyped a subset of these cases using OncoArray, a new, custom genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array for cancer genomics. Overall, they identify 65 loci newly associated with breast cancer susceptibility, and estimate that, together with 107 previously identified breast cancer susceptibility loci, these explain about 18 per cent of the familial relative risk of breast cancer. Polygenic risk scores may be used in risk prediction models and may improve early detection and targeted prevention of the disease. Breast cancer risk is influenced by rare coding variants in susceptibility genes, such as BRCA1, and many common, mostly non-coding variants. However, much of the genetic contribution to breast cancer risk remains unknown. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study of breast cancer in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry and 14,068 cases and 13,104 controls of East Asian ancestry1. We identified 65 new loci that are associated with overall breast cancer risk at P < 5 × 10−8. The majority of credible risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms in these loci fall in distal regulatory elements, and by integrating in silico data to predict target genes in breast cells at each locus, we demonstrate a strong overlap between candidate target genes and somatic driver genes in breast tumours. We also find that heritability of breast cancer due to all single-nucleotide polymorphisms in regulatory features was 2–5-fold enriched relative to the genome-wide average, with strong enrichment for particular transcription factor binding sites. These results provide further insight into genetic susceptibility to breast cancer and will improve the use of genetic risk scores for individualized screening and prevention.

1 January 2019 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NMNasim Mavaddat
Nasim Mavaddat
KMKyriaki Michailidou
Kyriaki Michailidou
JDJoe Dennis
Joe Dennis
MLMichael Lush
Michael Lush
LFLaura Fachal
Laura Fachal
DEDouglas F. Easton
Douglas F. Easton
Stratification of women according to their risk of breast cancer based on polygenic risk scores (PRSs) could improve screening and prevention strategies. Our aim was to develop PRSs, optimized for prediction of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific disease, from the largest available genome-wide association dataset and to empirically validate the PRSs in prospective studies. The development dataset comprised 94,075 case subjects and 75,017 control subjects of European ancestry from 69 studies, divided into training and validation sets. Samples were genotyped using genome-wide arrays, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected by stepwise regression or lasso penalized regression. The best performing PRSs were validated in an independent test set comprising 11,428 case subjects and 18,323 control subjects from 10 prospective studies and 190,040 women from UK Biobank (3,215 incident breast cancers). For the best PRSs (313 SNPs), the odds ratio for overall disease per 1 standard deviation in ten prospective studies was 1.61 (95%CI: 1.57-1.65) with area under receiver-operator curve (AUC) = 0.630 (95%CI: 0.628-0.651). The lifetime risk of overall breast cancer in the top centile of the PRSs was 32.6%. Compared with women in the middle quintile, those in the highest 1% of risk had 4.37- and 2.78-fold risks, and those in the lowest 1% of risk had 0.16- and 0.27-fold risks, of developing ER-positive and ER-negative disease, respectively. Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that this PRS was well calibrated and predicts disease risk accurately in the tails of the distribution. This PRS is a powerful and reliable predictor of breast cancer risk that may improve breast cancer prevention programs.

27 March 2013 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TCThe Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Collaboration
The Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Collaboration
KMKyriaki Michailidou
Kyriaki Michailidou
H(Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON)
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON)
KIkConFab Investigators
kConFab Investigators
AGAustralian Ovarian Cancer Study Group
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group
DEDouglas F Easton
Douglas F Easton

1 July 2004 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJulian Peto
Julian Peto
CGClare Gilham
Clare Gilham
OFOlivia Fletcher
Olivia Fletcher
FMFiona E Matthews
Fiona E Matthews

9 March 2015 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BOBocs
Bocs
KMKyriaki Michailidou
Kyriaki Michailidou
KIkConFab Investigators
kConFab Investigators
AGAOCS Group
AOCS Group
NBNbcs
Nbcs
DEDouglas F Easton
Douglas F Easton
Doug Easton and colleagues report the results of a large-scale genome-wide association study of breast cancer. They discover 15 new susceptibility loci and highlight likely target genes in several of the newly associated regions. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and large-scale replication studies have identified common variants in 79 loci associated with breast cancer, explaining ∼14% of the familial risk of the disease. To identify new susceptibility loci, we performed a meta-analysis of 11 GWAS, comprising 15,748 breast cancer cases and 18,084 controls together with 46,785 cases and 42,892 controls from 41 studies genotyped on a 211,155-marker custom array (iCOGS). Analyses were restricted to women of European ancestry. We generated genotypes for more than 11 million SNPs by imputation using the 1000 Genomes Project reference panel, and we identified 15 new loci associated with breast cancer at P < 5 × 10−8. Combining association analysis with ChIP-seq chromatin binding data in mammary cell lines and ChIA-PET chromatin interaction data from ENCODE, we identified likely target genes in two regions: SETBP1 at 18q12.3 and RNF115 and PDZK1 at 1q21.1. One association appears to be driven by an amino acid substitution encoded in EXO1.