Matthew J. Witt

Dr. Matthew J. Witt


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2008 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDavid W. Sims
David W. Sims
ESEmily J. Southall
Emily J. Southall
NHNicolas E. Humphries
Nicolas E. Humphries
GHGraeme C. Hays
Graeme C. Hays
Corey BradshawCorey Bradshaw
Corey Bradshaw
JMJulian D. Metcalfe
Julian D. Metcalfe

27 January 2015 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNathan D. Merchant
Nathan D. Merchant
KFKurt M. Fristrup
Kurt M. Fristrup
MJMark P. Johnson
Mark P. Johnson
PTPeter L. Tyack
Peter L. Tyack
MWMatthew J. Witt
Matthew J. Witt
SPSusan E. Parks
Susan E. Parks
Summary: Many organisms depend on sound for communication, predator/prey detection and navigation. The acoustic environment can therefore play an important role in ecosystem dynamics and evolution. A growing number of studies are documenting acoustic habitats and their influences on animal development, behaviour, physiology and spatial ecology, which has led to increasing demand for passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) expertise in the life sciences. However, as yet, there has been no synthesis of data processing methods for acoustic habitat monitoring, which presents an unnecessary obstacle to would‐be PAM analysts. Here, we review the signal processing techniques needed to produce calibrated measurements of terrestrial and aquatic acoustic habitats. We include a supplemental tutorial and template computer codes in matlab and r, which give detailed guidance on how to produce calibrated spectrograms and statistical analyses of sound levels. Key metrics and terminology for the characterisation of biotic, abiotic and anthropogenic sound are covered, and their application to relevant monitoring scenarios is illustrated through example data sets. To inform study design and hardware selection, we also include an up‐to‐date overview of terrestrial and aquatic PAM instruments. Monitoring of acoustic habitats at large spatiotemporal scales is becoming possible through recent advances in PAM technology. This will enhance our understanding of the role of sound in the spatial ecology of acoustically sensitive species and inform spatial planning to mitigate the rising influence of anthropogenic noise in these ecosystems. As we demonstrate in this work, progress in these areas will depend upon the application of consistent and appropriate PAM methodologies.

26 November 2009 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RIRichard Inger
Richard Inger
MAMartin J. Attrill
Martin J. Attrill
SBStuart Bearhop
Stuart Bearhop
ABAnnette Cameron Broderick
Annette Cameron Broderick
WGW. James Grecian
W. James Grecian
Brendan GodleyBrendan Godley
Brendan Godley

1 January 2006 in Progress in Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAnthony Richardson
Anthony Richardson
AWA.W. Walne
A.W. Walne
AJA.W.G. John
A.W.G. John
TJT.D. Jonas
T.D. Jonas
JLJ.A. Lindley
J.A. Lindley
MWMatthew J. Witt
Matthew J. Witt

18 January 2008 in Endangered Species Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Brendan GodleyBrendan Godley
Brendan Godley
JBJ. M. Blumenthal
J. M. Blumenthal
ABAnnette Cameron Broderick
Annette Cameron Broderick
COCoyne
Coyne
MGM. H. Godfrey
M. H. Godfrey
MCM. S. Coyne
M. S. Coyne

8 March 2010 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SVStephen C. Votier
Stephen C. Votier
SBStuart Bearhop
Stuart Bearhop
MWMatthew J. Witt
Matthew J. Witt
RIRichard Inger
Richard Inger
DTDavid Thompson
David Thompson
JNJason Newton
Jason Newton
1. The large amount of discards produced by commercial fisheries can have major impacts on marine predator populations: this abundant food may increase populations of some scavengers or decrease others via accidental bycatch. Yet, despite the conservation implications of discard practices, the ecology of individual scavengers is poorly understood. 2. Here, we assess the influence of commercial fisheries’ activity on the foraging behaviour of individual breeding northern gannets Morus bassanus. Using recent developments in stable isotope mixing models (Stable Isotope Analysis in R or SIAR) we estimate individual discard consumption. Using GPS tracking and the Vessel Monitoring System (VMS), we investigate behavioural responses to trawlers. 3. Analysis of conventional diet samples, as well as stable isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen in blood (plasma and cells), highlight marked individual differences in the proportion of fishery discards in the diet. Individual differences in foraging behaviour revealed by stable isotopes show evidence of both short-term consistency and behavioural flexibility. 4. At-sea path tortuosity of 25 gannets (tracked using GPS loggers) revealed scale-dependent adjustments in response to VMS-derived fishing vessel locations, as well as to sea surface temperature, chlorophyll a concentration and copepod abundance. The results also indicate individual variability in behavioural response to trawlers. 5. Individual differences in the amount of discards estimated from SIAR were negatively correlated with differences in foraging trip length and body condition, indicating potential fitness consequences. 6. Synthesis and applications. The management of commercial fisheries and apex predators is a daunting task. Ultimately, reducing bycatch and removing dependency on discards remain key conservation priorities, but managers should also ensure that scavenging species have sufficient alternative food to meet their energetic needs, to ameliorate potential unforeseen knock-on consequences. The results of Stable Isotope Analysis (SIAR) reveal intra-population differences in discard consumption by gannets; differences that have impacts on foraging effort and body condition. The use of GPS tracking and Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) reveal that gannet at-sea behaviour is influenced by fishing vessels, although this also varies among individuals. A combination of SIAR, GPS tracking and VMS can be used to study fishery/scavenger interactions in detail at the individual level, to answer fundamental questions about scavenging behaviour.