Background: Resin infiltration is a micro-invasive treatment for molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH). In this study it was aimed to evaluate the masking effect of resin infiltration treatment (ICON) on hypomineralised enamel surface of permanent anterior teeth by using laser fluorescence, spectrophotometer, and cross-polarisation photography.Methods: A total of 116 permanent central incisors in 37 patients were included in the study. The resin infiltration treatment (Icon®) was applied to the teeth with MIH; the healthy teeth received no treatment (control). Hypomineralised enamel lesions were evaluated by ICDAS II criteria. DIAGNOdent Pen was used to assess the lesions and healthy enamel surface quantitatively. Colour changes in enamel lesions were evaluated by using a spectrophotometer (VITA EasyShare). Each enamel lesion was imaged using a cross-polarization technique before and after treatment. All photos were assessed using Image J to evaluate the changes in lesion size. Enamel lesions were evaluated before; immediately after; 1; 3; and 6 months after treatment. Statistical significance was set asp < 0.05.Results: After the resin infiltration, significant decreases were found in the mean DIAGNOdent values for the treatment group (p < 0.05). The colour differences before and after treatment significantly differed in all follow-ups (p < 0.05). In the treatment group, lesion areas decreased significantly after treatment (p < 0.05).Conclusions: The resin infiltration treatment has a masking effect on MIH lesions without cavities, with stable outcomes after six months. The cross-polarization photography technique may be use to evaluate the lesion size instead of photography with flash.Trial registration.NCT04685889 (registered 28 December 2020).
Background: Pain control during dental procedures is one of the most important topics related to behavior management in children. This study aims to compare the pain perception associated with a needle-free system (Comfort-In™) and the dental needle method during filling and pulpotomy treatments in children. Methods: The study included teeth that required treatment (pulpotomy or filling treatment) in 56 patients aged 4 to 11 years with no systemic problems or history of allergy. Patients were randomly divided into the needle-free system group (filling treatment, n = 13; pulpotomy, n = 15) and dental needle method group (filling treatment, n = 14; pulpotomy, n = 14). For pulpotomy and filling treatment performed with 0.3 mL anesthesia, the active ingredient of which is 2% lidocaine and 1/80000 epinephrine. The patients’ behavior before the procedure was evaluated by a pediatric dentist using the Frankl Behavior Scale. The pain intensity was assessed Immediately after injection (induction), during treatment (treatment), and at the end of the treatment (post treatment) by the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale. Results: The median (IQR-InterQuartile Range) induction pain value was 6[3-8] and 2[0-4] in dental needle method and needle-free system respectively, p < 0.001). In filling and pulpotomy treatment group, no difference between the needle and needle-free group for treatment and post-treatment pain values. Conclusions: For pulpotomy and filling treatment, needle-free system performed with 0.3 mL anesthesia was found as effective as infiltrative anesthesia with a dental needle method. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04653974. Registered 4 December 2020 – Retrospectively registered.