Oncolytic viral therapy has been accepted as a standard immunotherapy since talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC, Imlygic^®) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for melanoma treatment in 2015. Various oncolytic viruses (OVs), such as HF10 (Canerpaturev—C-REV) and CVA21 (CAVATAK), are now actively being developed in phase II as monotherapies, or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors against melanoma. Moreover, in glioma, several OVs have clearly demonstrated both safety and a promising efficacy in the phase I clinical trials. Additionally, the safety of several OVs, such as pelareorep (Reolysin^®), proved their safety and efficacy in combination with paclitaxel in breast cancer patients, but the outcomes of OVs as monotherapy against breast cancer have not provided a clear therapeutic strategy for OVs. The clinical trials of OVs against pancreatic cancer have not yet demonstrated efficacy as either monotherapy or as part of combination therapy. However, there are several oncolytic viruses that have successfully proved their efficacy in different preclinical models. In this review, we mainly focused on the oncolytic viruses that transitioned into clinical trials against melanoma, glioma, pancreatic, and breast cancers. Hence, we described the current status and future prospects of OVs clinical trials against melanoma, glioma, pancreatic, and breast cancers.

Oncolytic viruses are opening new possibilities in cancer therapy with their unique mechanism of selective replication within tumor cells and triggering of anti-tumor immune responses. HF10 is an oncolytic herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) with a unique genomic structure that has non-engineered deletions and insertions accompanied by frame shift mutations, in contrast to the majority of engineered oncolytic viruses. At the genetic level, HF10 naturally lacks the expression of UL43, UL49.5, UL55, UL56, and latency-associated transcripts, and overexpresses UL53 and UL54. In preclinical studies, HF10 replicated efficiently within tumor cells with extensive cytolytic effects and induced increased numbers of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells within the tumor, leading to a significant reduction in tumor growth and prolonged survival rates. Investigator-initiated clinical studies of HF10 have been completed in recurrent breast carcinoma, head and neck cancer, and unresectable pancreatic cancer in Japan. Phase I trials were subsequently completed in refractory superficial cancers and melanoma in the United States. HF10 has been demonstrated to have a high safety margin with low frequency of adverse effects in all treated patients. Interestingly, HF10 antigens were detected in pancreatic carcinoma over 300 days after treatment with infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, which enhanced the immune response. To date, preliminary results from a Phase II trial have indicated that HF10 in combination with ipilimumab (anti–CTLA-4) is safe and well tolerated, with high anti-tumor efficacy. Improvement of the effect of ipilimumab was observed in patients with stage IIIb, IIIc, or IV unresectable or metastatic melanoma. This review provides a concise description of the genomic functional organization of HF10 compared with talimogene laherparepvec. Furthermore, this review focuses on HF10 in cancer treatment as monotherapy as well as in combination therapy through a concise description of all preclinical and clinical data. In addition, we will address approaches for future directions in HF10 studies as cancer therapy.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in the fate of cancer cells, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells have emerged as key players in shaping this complex milieu. Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in the world. The most common standard treatments for cancer are surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapeutic drugs. In the last decade, immunotherapy has had a potential effect on the treatment of cancer patients with poor prognoses. One of the immune therapeutic targeted approaches that shows anticancer efficacy is a type 2 diabetes medication, metformin. Beyond its glycemic control properties, studies have revealed intriguing immunomodulatory properties of metformin. Meanwhile, several studies focus on the impact of metformin on tumor-infiltrating immune cells in various tumor models. In several tumor models, metformin can modulate tumor-infiltrated effector immune cells, CD8⁺, CD4⁺ T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, as well as suppressor immune cells, T regulatory cells, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). In this review, we discuss the role of metformin in modulating tumor-infiltrating immune cells in different preclinical models and clinical trials. Both preclinical and clinical studies suggest that metformin holds promise as adjunctive therapy in cancer treatment by modulating the immune response within the tumor microenvironment. Nonetheless, both the tumor type and the combined therapy have an impact on the specific targets of metformin in the TME. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying the immunomodulatory effects of metformin and to optimize its clinical application in cancer patients.

The naturally occurring oncolytic herpes simplex virus canerpaturev (C-REV), formerly HF10, proved its therapeutic efficacy and safety in multiple clinical trials against melanoma, pancreatic, breast, and head and neck cancers. Meanwhile, patients with colorectal cancer, which has increased in prevalence in recent decades, continue to have poor prognosis and morbidity. Combination therapy has better response rates than monotherapy. Hence, we investigated the antitumor efficacy of cetuximab, a widely used anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, and C-REV, either alone or in combination, in vitro and in an in vivo human colorectal xenograft model. In human colorectal cancer cell lines with different levels of EGFR expression (HT-29, WiDr, and CW2), C-REV exhibited cytotoxic effects in a time- and dose-dependent manner, irrespective of EGFR expression. Moreover, cetuximab had no effect on viral replication in vitro. Combining cetuximab and C-REV induced a synergistic antitumor effect in HT-29 tumor xenograft models by promoting the distribution of C-REV throughout the tumor and suppressing angiogenesis. Application of cetuximab prior to C-REV yielded better tumor regression than administration of the drug after the virus. Thus, cetuximab represents an ideal virus-associated agent for antitumor therapy, and combination therapy represents a promising antitumor strategy for human colorectal cancer.

Oncolytic virus (OV) therapy is widely considered as a major breakthrough in anti-cancer treatments. In our previous study, the efficacy and safety of using C-REV for anti-cancer therapy in patients during stage I clinical trial was reported. The stimulator of interferon genes (STING)–TBK1–IRF3–IFN pathway is known to act as the central cellular host defense against viral infection. Recent reports have linked low expression levels of cGAS and STING in cancer cells to poor prognosis among patients. Moreover, downregulation of cGAS and STING has been linked to higher susceptibility to OV infection among several cancer cell lines. In this paper, we show that there is little correlation between levels of cGAS/STING expression and susceptibility to C-REV among human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Despite having a responsive STING pathway, BxPC-3 cells are highly susceptible to C-REV infection. Upon pre-activation of the STING pathway, BxPc-3 cells exhibited resistance to C-REV infection. However, without pre-activation, C-REV completely suppressed the STING pathway in BxPC-3 cells. Additionally, despite harboring defects in the STING pathway, other high-grade cancer cell lines, such as Capan-2, PANC-1 and MiaPaCa-2, still exhibited low susceptibility to C-REV infection. Furthermore, overexpression of STING in MiaPaCa-2 cells altered susceptibility to a limited extent. Taken together, our data suggest that the cGAS–STING pathway plays a minor role in the susceptibility of pancreatic cancer cell lines to C-REV infection.

Background: Rosemary (ROLE) and costus (SLRE) have been established to show antioxidant effects. Aim: This study aimed to show the ameliorate effects of ROLE and SLRE to side-effects induced by Cisplatin (CIS) in tumor-bearing mice. Materials and Methods: The extracts of ROLE and SLRE were examined for their phytochemical activities. Mice were inoculated with tumor cells treated with CIS at days 3-7 and ROLE or SLRE at days 3-14. Mice were sacrificed on day 14 for CBC and T-cell analysis. Results: Phytochemical analysis revealed that both ROLE and SLRE showed similar antioxidant activities. Treatment with EAC bearing mice with CIS induced antitumor efficacy of about 90%. The treatment with ROLE or SLRE alone had no antitumor activity with CIS. However, Co-administration of ROLE or SLRE with CIS increased significantly antitumor efficacy of CIS. . Flow cytometric analysis showed that the number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells decreased in EAC bearing mice after treatment with CIS. Treatment with both ROLE and SLRE improved the number of these cells. Conclusion: A combination of rosemary and costus can enhance the antitumor activity and lower the side effects of cisplatin, as well as enhances cell-mediated immunity.