Adequate bowel preparation is essential for high-quality colonoscopy but remains challenging in hospitalized patients, and comparative data on preparation volume are limited. To compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of very low-volume (1-liter [1L]), low-volume (2-liter [2L]), and high-volume (4-liter [4L]) polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimens for inpatient colonoscopy preparation. Multicenter, randomized controlled, endoscopist-blinded trial. (EudraCT: 2019-002799-15; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04708366). Community and academic hospitals in Italy. Hospitalized adults undergoing elective colonoscopy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to split-dose 1L PEG-ascorbate, 2L PEG-ascorbate, or 4L PEG. Primary end point was adequate bowel cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [BBPS] score ≥6 with all segments ≥2). Secondary end points included high-quality cleansing (BBPS score, 8 to 9), high-quality right-colon cleansing (BBPS score, 3), and willingness to repeat. Among 665 randomly assigned patients (1L, n = 228; 2L, n = 218; 4L, n = 219), adequate overall cleansing occurred in 82.0%, 78.0%, and 78.5% (absolute difference between the 1L and 2L groups [Δ1L-2L], 4.0 percentage points [95% CI, -3.4 to 11.4 percentage points]; absolute difference between the 1L and 4L groups [Δ1L-4L], 3.5 percentage points [CI, -3.9 to 10.9 percentage points]). High-quality overall cleansing occurred in 46.9%, 35.3%, and 37.4% (Δ1L-2L, 11.6 percentage points [CI, 2.5 to 20.5 percentage points]; Δ1L-4L, 9.5 percentage points [CI, 0.3 to 18.5 percentage points]). High-quality right-colon cleansing occurred in 40.6%, 29.5%, and 31.6% (Δ1L-2L, 11.2 percentage points [CI, 2.1 to 20.0 percentage points]; Δ1L-4L, 9.0 percentage points [CI, 0.0 to 17.9 percentage points]). Tolerability was good across regimens, with the highest willingness to repeat in the 1L group (84.2%), despite more frequent vomiting and thirst. Patients requiring urgent colonoscopy for active gastrointestinal bleeding and those with severe/unstable comorbid conditions were excluded. In hospitalized adults undergoing elective colonoscopy, 1L PEG-ascorbate yielded higher rates of high-quality cleansing, including right colon, than 2L PEG-ascorbate and 4L PEG, with similar rates of adequate cleansing and high willingness to repeat. Norgine Srl.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major complication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), due to coexistence of altered microbiota, chronic inflammation, and immune dysregulation. This narrative review summarizes recent evidence on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of CDI in IBD. Overall, IBD patients have a four- to five-fold higher risk of CDI than the general population and face more severe courses, higher rates of hospitalization, colectomy, recurrence, and mortality. Pathogenesis involves profound dysbiosis with loss of butyrate-producing Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, bile acid imbalance that promotes spore germination, and enhanced toxin effects on an already inflamed mucosa. Major risk factors include active colonic disease, broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure, prolonged hospitalization, and corticosteroid or combined immunosuppressive therapy. Diagnosis requires careful integration of stool assays with clinical evaluation, supported by endoscopy or imaging when needed, to distinguish infection from IBD flares. Recommended first-line treatments are fidaxomicin or oral vancomycin, reserving fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent or high-risk cases. Optimal IBD control is essential to reduce both primary and recurrent infection. CDI and IBD share a mutual pathogenic interplay in which microbial, immune, and therapeutic factors from each condition drive and magnify the other. Early recognition, guideline-based antibiotic therapy, judicious use of immunosuppression, and microbiota-based preventive strategies are crucial to improve patient outcomes and limit recurrence, thus reducing healthcare costs.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely prescribed worldwide for their analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory properties. However, their long-term use is associated with substantial gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Although upper GI injury has traditionally received greater attention, NSAID-induced enteropathy is now increasingly recognized as a common yet underdiagnosed condition. Advances in small-bowel imaging, particularly capsule endoscopy, have demonstrated that mucosal injury of the small intestine occurs in up to 70–80% of chronic NSAID users and may also develop after short-term exposure in otherwise healthy individuals, often without overt clinical symptoms. When symptoms do occur, NSAID-induced enteropathy is characterized by non-specific clinical manifestations and may lead to severe complications in approximately 1% of cases. The pathogenesis of NSAID-induced enteropathy is multifactorial and more complex than that underlying upper GI damage. It involves prostaglandin depletion, increased intestinal permeability, bile acid-mediated toxicity, enterohepatic recirculation of NSAIDs, and, importantly, interactions with the gut microbiota. Concomitant therapies, particularly proton pump inhibitors, may further aggravate small-bowel injury by promoting intestinal dysbiosis. Growing evidence supports a relevant contributory role for the gut microbiota as both a mediator and a modulator of NSAID-induced toxicity, affecting epithelial barrier function, oxidative stress, immune responses, and bile acid metabolism. This review provides an overview of current knowledge of NSAID-induced enteropathy, with a particular emphasis on the microbiota-driven mechanisms underlying mucosal injury. By integrating emerging microbiota-targeted therapeutic approaches, we propose a management algorithm that may help modify disease progression in a condition that remains frequently overlooked in clinical practice.