Yun Shu

Dr. Yun Shu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 June 2022 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YSYun Shu
Yun Shu
JHJingnan Hu
Jingnan Hu
SZSHAOHUI ZHANG
SHAOHUI ZHANG
WSWolfgang Schöpp
Wolfgang Schöpp
WTWei Tang
Wei Tang
DXDeyuan Xie
Deyuan Xie

5 August 2019 in RSC Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYun Shu
Yun Shu
FZFan Zhang
Fan Zhang
HWHongchang Wang
Hongchang Wang
A rice husk derived catalyst exhibited high SCR activity and excellent SO 2 + H 2 O tolerance.

19 May 2016 in Chemical Research in Chinese Universities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FZFan Zhang
Fan Zhang
GTGang Tian
Gang Tian
HWHongmei Wang
Hongmei Wang
HWHongchang Wang
Hongchang Wang
CZChen Zhang
Chen Zhang
YSYun Shu
Yun Shu

4 February 2025 in Environmental Research Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
QYQin Yan
Qin Yan
TXTingyu Xiao
Tingyu Xiao
WZWenjie Zhang
Wenjie Zhang
SKShaofei Kong
Shaofei Kong
YZYuzhe Zhang
Yuzhe Zhang
YSYun Shu
Yun Shu
Residential coal burning (RCB) is a notable contribution source of airborne pollution in China. To address this, a suite of control policies has been implemented, leading to a shift in the energy structure and a limitation in pollution emission within RCB sector. This study presents emission inventories for SO2, NOx, CO, and PM2.5 from RCB between 2010 and 2020, utilizing both published and measured emission factors (EFs). Furthermore, the emission amounts of pollution in year 2030 and 2050 were projected. Since 2010 to 2020, emission of pollution from RCB sector has demonstrated a noticeable decreasing trend, especially in policy priority regions. The emission amounts in policy priority regions are at a similar level to those in the South region. The most substantial reductions were observed in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region, with decreases of 69.8%, 74.2%, 74.8%, 79.8% 60.6% for SO2, NOx, CO, PM2.5 and BC respectively. Finally, the updated emission data used to calibrate the emission in GEOS-Chem model and to simulated national particle and gas pollution concentration in heating season emitted from RCB for year 2020 and 2030. The simulation results demonstrate a migration in the emission intensity center in the Northeast region. For SO₂, NO₂ and PM2.5, the RCB contribution decreased from 3.1, 18.3 and 19.9 μg/m³ in 2020 to 1.8, 11.6 and 9.8 μg/m³ in 2030, respectively. The SO2, NO2 and PM2.5 impact from RCB was -0.03 to 0.29, 0.61 to 7.04 and 1.2 to 2.9 μg/m3 on average in 2030 which shown a minor impact on ambient pollution in BTH region during heating season.

21 April 2026 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DYDeng Yinhe
Deng Yinhe
YSYun Shu
Yun Shu
HSHong Sun
Hong Sun
SLShule Liu
Shule Liu
ZMZhanyun Ma
Zhanyun Ma
QGQingxian Gao
Qingxian Gao
This study estimates China’s methane (CH4) emissions from 43 specific emission sources in 2020 and projects future trends through 2050 under two scenarios: Current Legislation (CLE) and Maximum Technically Feasible Reduction (MFR). The analysis utilises the Greenhouse gas and Air pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model methane framework, incorporating updated province-level activity data to capture the pronounced regional heterogeneity inherent in emission profiles and mitigation capacities. The results reveal a national CH4 budget of 1114 MtCO2e in 2020, with the energy sector (59%) and agriculture (28%) emerging as the primary contributors. A substantial technical mitigation potential is identified; by 2050, emissions could be curtailed by up to 48% relative to the CLE scenario, representing a 46% reduction from 2020 levels. The energy and waste sectors emerge as the primary contributors to this potential. Specifically, coal mining CH4 abatement constitutes 58% of the energy sector’s total reduction potential, while enhanced solid waste management accounts for 97% of the mitigation within the waste sector. Key measures include ventilation air methane (VAM) oxidation and pre-mining degasification, as well as anaerobic digestion and recovery and utilization for energy use. Owing to regional disparities in hydrothermal conditions (representing the combined influence of temperature and moisture), demographic status, economic development, the most effective mitigation strategies vary across provinces. For example, pre-mining degasification and VAM oxidation are most impactful in major coal-producing regions such as Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, and Shaanxi. In contrast, anaerobic digestion, recovery and utilization, and waste incineration play a dominant role in more economically developed and densely populated provinces such as Jiangsu, Shandong and Zhejiang. By delineating region-specific technological priorities, this study quantifies the maximum technical mitigation potential for China and offers guidance for other nations facing similar mitigation challenges.

21 May 2026 in SSRN Electronic Journal
Verified
Preprint
Open access
YDYinhe Deng
Yinhe Deng
YSYun Shu
Yun Shu
HSHong Sun
Hong Sun
SLShule Liu
Shule Liu
LMLinlin Ma
Linlin Ma
To response to the urgent need for anthropogenic methane mitigation, the State Council of China issued the Methane Emissions Control Action Plan in 2023, prioritizing the strategic deployment of advanced emission control technologies across the energy, waste, and agricultural sectors. Despite its significance, a granular, measure-by-measure evaluation of this national policy remains absent in the current literature. This study utilizes 17 provinces in Northern China as a representative case to quantitatively assess the implications of 13 key mitigation actions. Employing the Greenhouse gas and Air pollution Interactions and Synergies model methane framework and scenario analysis, we find that the full implementation of these measures could yield a 21% reduction in regional methane emissions by 2050 relative to 2020 levels. Five critical technical levers - ventilation air methane (VAM) oxidation and utilization, landfill gas management, pre-mining drainage, leak detection and repair programs, and waste recycling – collectively account for 93% of the total mitigation potential. However, the efficacy of specific mitigation measures exhibits significant provincial heterogeneity. Energy-intensive hubs, such as Shanxi, Shaanxi, Inner Mongolia, benefit predominantly from coal mining methane related interventions (VAM oxidation and pre-mining drainage), whereas landfill gas management and waste recycling are pivotal are pivotal for economically developed and densely populated regions like Beijing and Shandong. By identifying province-tailored mitigation portfolios, our findings provide high-resolution guidance for optimizing methane governance in China and offer a replicable evaluation framework for other nations striving to achieve ambitious climate targets.