Yi XIONG

Dr. Yi XIONG


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 August 2018 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YXYi XIONG
Yi XIONG
MMM.Z. Ma
M.Z. Ma
THTiantian He
Tiantian He
YLYan Lu
Yan Lu
FRFengzhang Ren
Fengzhang Ren
WCWei Cao
Wei Cao
The impacts of rolling temperature on phase transformations and mechanical properties were investigated for AISI 316LN austenitic stainless steel subjected to rolling at cryogenic and room temperatures. The microstructure evolution and the mechanical properties were investigated by means of optical, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy, an X-ray diffractometer, microhardness tester, and tensile testing system. Results showed that strain-induced martensitic transformation occurred at both deformation temperatures, and the martensite volume fraction increased with the deformation. Compared with room temperature rolling, cryorolling substantially enhanced the martensite transformation rate. At 50% deformation, it yielded the same fraction as the room temperature counterpart at 90% strain, while at 70%, it totally transformed the austenite to martensite. The strength and hardness of the stainless steel increased remarkably with the deformation, but the corresponding elongation decreased dramatically. Meanwhile, the tensile fracture morphology changed from a typical ductile rupture to a mixture of ductile and quasi-cleavage fracture. The phase transformation and deformation mechanisms differed at two temperatures, with the martensite deformation contributing to the former, and austenite deformation to the latter. Orientations between the transformed martensite and its parent phase followed the K–S (Kurdjumov–Sachs) relationship.

20 February 2018 in Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YXYi XIONG
Yi XIONG
THTiantian He
Tiantian He
YLYan Lu
Yan Lu
FRFengzhang Ren
Fengzhang Ren
Alex A. VolinskyAlex A. Volinsky
Alex A. Volinsky
WCWei Cao
Wei Cao

30 August 2018 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HYHuai Yao
Huai Yao
JWJiuba Wen
Jiuba Wen
YXYi XIONG
Yi XIONG
YLYa Liu
Ya Liu
YLYan Lu
Yan Lu
WCWei Cao
Wei Cao
The Mg–Zn–Zr–Gd alloys belong to a group of biometallic alloys suitable for bone substitution. While biocompatibility arises from the harmlessness of the metals, the biocorrosion behavior and its origins remain elusive. Here, aiming for the tailored biodegradability, we prepared the Mg–2.0Zn–0.5Zr–xGd (wt %) alloys with different Gd percentages (x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), and studied their microstructures and biocorrosion behavior. Results showed that adding a moderate amount of Gd into Mg–2.0Zn–0.5Zr alloys will refine and homogenize α-Mg grains, change the morphology and distribution of (Mg, Zn)3Gd, and lead to enhancement of mechanical properties and anticorrosive performance. At the optimized content of 3.0%, the fishbone-shaped network, ellipsoidal, and rod-like (Mg, Zn)3Gd phase turns up, along with the 14H-type long period stacking ordered (14H-LPSO) structures decorated with nanoscale rod-like (Mg, Zn)3Gd phases. The 14H-LPSO structure only exists when x ≥ 3.0, and its content increases with the Gd content. The Mg–2.0Zn–0.5Zr–3.0Gd alloy possesses a better ultimate tensile strength of 204 ± 3 MPa, yield strength of 155 ± 3 MPa, and elongation of 10.6 ± 0.6%. Corrosion tests verified that the Mg–2.0Zn–0.5Zr–3.0Gd alloy possesses the best corrosion resistance and uniform corrosion mode. The microstructure impacts on the corrosion resistance were also studied.

21 September 2021 in Steel Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YMYun-Fei Ma
Yun-Fei Ma
YXYi XIONG
Yi XIONG
ZCZheng-Ge Chen
Zheng-Ge Chen
XZXiao-Qin Zha
Xiao-Qin Zha
THTian-Tian He
Tian-Tian He
WCWei Cao
Wei Cao

1 July 2022 in npj Materials Degradation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSHarishchandra Singh
Harishchandra Singh
YXYi XIONG
Yi XIONG
EREkta Rani
Ekta Rani
SWShubo Wang
Shubo Wang
Mourad KharbachMourad Kharbach
Mourad Kharbach
WCWei Cao
Wei Cao
The widely used stainless steels and their deformed variants are anticorrosive in ambient conditions due to passivation layers composed of chromium oxides. Conventionally, corrosion and erosion of the steels are attributed to the breakdown of such layers but seldomly to the origin that depends on surface heterogeneity at the microscopic level. In this work, the nanometer-scaled chemical heterogeneity at the surface unveiled via spectro-microscopy and chemometric analysis unexpectedly dominates the breakdown and corrosion behavior of the cold-rolled Ce-modified 2507 super-duplex stainless steels (SDSS) over its hot-deformed counterpart. Though relatively uniformly covered by a native Cr2O3 layer revealed by X-ray photoemission electron microscopy, the cold-rolled SDSS behaved poorly in passivity because of locally distributed Fe3+ rich nano-islands over the Fe/Cr oxide layer. This atomic-level knowledge provides a deep understanding of corrosion of stainless steel and is expected to benefit corrosion controls of similar high-alloyed metals.

25 September 2020 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XZXiaoqin Zha
Xiaoqin Zha
YXYi XIONG
Yi XIONG
TZTian Zhou
Tian Zhou
YRYong-Feng Ren
Yong-Feng Ren
PHPeng-Hui Hei
Peng-Hui Hei
WCWei Cao
Wei Cao
Stress relief treatments were carried out separately with a pneumatic chipping hammer, ultrasonic peening treatment, and heat treatment for metal active-gas welding (MAG) welded joints of 2205 duplex stainless steel. The effects of these methods on the residual stress, microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of welded joints were studied. Results show the stress state of the weld and the surrounding area was effectively improved by the pneumatic chipping hammer and ultrasonic peening treatment, and the residual stress field of the surface layer changed from tensile stress to compressive stress. On the contrary, low-temperature stress relieving annealing had no obvious effect on stress distribution. After the pneumatic chipping hammer and ultrasonic peening treatment, the welded joints were machined and hardened. Correspondingly, strength and hardness were improved. However, the heat treatment only led to a slight decrease in strength and hardness due to the static recovery of the welded joint structure. All stress relief methods effectively improved the corrosion resistance of welded joints, with the ultrasonic peening treatment giving the best performance.