UNGGI LEE

Dr. UNGGI LEE

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 October 2023 in Education and Information Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ULUNGGI LEE
UNGGI LEE
HJHaewon Jung
Haewon Jung
YJYounghoon Jeon
Younghoon Jeon
YSYounghoon Sohn
Younghoon Sohn
WHWonhee Hwang
Wonhee Hwang
HKHyeoncheol Kim
Hyeoncheol Kim

18 September 2023 in Education and Information Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ULUNGGI LEE
UNGGI LEE
AHAriel Han
Ariel Han
JLJeongjin Lee
Jeongjin Lee
ELEunseo Lee
Eunseo Lee
JKJiwon Kim
Jiwon Kim
CLCheolil Lim
Cheolil Lim

26 March 2025 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJieun Lim
Jieun Lim
ULUNGGI LEE
UNGGI LEE
JKJunbo Koh
Junbo Koh
YJYeil Jeong
Yeil Jeong
YLYunseo Lee
Yunseo Lee
JMJewoong Moon
Jewoong Moon

13 September 2024 in Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ULUNGGI LEE
UNGGI LEE
MJMinji Jeon
Minji Jeon
YLYunseo Lee
Yunseo Lee
GBGyuri Byun
Gyuri Byun
YSYoorim Son
Yoorim Son
HKHyeoncheol Kim
Hyeoncheol Kim

19 December 2024 in International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ULUNGGI LEE
UNGGI LEE
YKYoungin Kim
Youngin Kim
SLSangyun Lee
Sangyun Lee
JPJaehyeon Park
Jaehyeon Park
JMJin Mun
Jin Mun
YYYun Joo Yoo
Yun Joo Yoo
This paper explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, to enhance the precision and effectiveness of Automated Assessment Systems (AAS) for open-ended mathematics problems. While LLMs have demonstrated transformative capabilities across various disciplines, their application in AAS, particularly for mathematical logic and open-ended problem-solving, still needs to be explored. Our research addresses this gap by developing and critically evaluating a GPT-4-based AAS. We analyzed 4,180 responses to open-ended mathematics questions from 380 6th-grade primary school students. Three human experts and the GPT-4 model independently assessed these responses using a pre-established rubric. Our findings reveal high consistency between human and GPT-4 assessments in most instances, highlighting the potential of integrating GPT-4 into AAS. We categorized scoring discrepancies from GPT-4 and human raters by error type and identified specific mathematical content areas where automated assessment faced limitations. We evaluated two strategies to enhance GPT-4’s assessment capabilities: (1) using elaborate prompts and (2) implementing advanced prompt engineering techniques such as Chain-of-thought, Self-consistency, and Tree-of-thought. While comprehensive prompts significantly improved assessment quality, applying advanced prompt engineering techniques directly produced suboptimal results, indicating a need for further refinement. This study contributes to the emerging body of research evaluating GPT-4 in the context of AAS for open-ended mathematics problems, shedding light on both the strengths and limitations of this approach. Our findings provide valuable insights and a foundation for future research to refine the integration of LLMs in AAS, particularly in mathematics education.

16 October 2024 in Smart Learning Environments
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ULUNGGI LEE
UNGGI LEE
YJYeil Jeong
Yeil Jeong
JKJunbo Koh
Junbo Koh
GBGyuri Byun
Gyuri Byun
YLYunseo Lee
Yunseo Lee
HKHyeoncheol Kim
Hyeoncheol Kim
This preliminary study explores how GPT-4 Vision (GPT-4V) technology can be integrated into teacher analytics through observational assessment, aiming to improve reflective teaching practice. Our study develops a Video-based Automatic Assessment System (VidAAS) powered by GPT-4V. This approach uses Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) to provide detailed insights into classroom dynamics. Our study encompasses various methods with multiple steps: a comprehensive literature review, prototype development of the VidAAS, and usability testing with in-service teachers. The study findings reveal that VidAAS demonstrates high accuracy in evaluating skills in the behavioral (psychomotor) domain and offers comprehensive explanations for each assessment. While showing promise in these areas, the system also indicates potential for further enhancement in processing speed and refinement in assessing cognitive and affective domains. We discuss how VidAAS supports teachers’ reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action, emphasizing the need to balance AI-driven insights and human judgment. Our study findings also guide future research avenues for VidAAS design, implementation, and integration in teacher analytics, underscoring GPT-4V’s potential for real-time, scalable feedback and a deeper classroom understanding.