Krzysztof Dominik Słowiński

Dr. Krzysztof Dominik Słowiński


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 October 2025 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKTomasz Klimczak
Tomasz Klimczak
KSKrzysztof Dominik Słowiński
Krzysztof Dominik Słowiński
AMAlicja Majos
Alicja Majos
JŚJacek Śmigielski
Jacek Śmigielski
WCWojciech Jakub Ciesielski
Wojciech Jakub Ciesielski
Background: Bridge therapy before surgery is one of indications for intragastric balloon (IGB) implantation. We aim to compare the outcomes of Medsil (non-adjustable), Orbera365 (non-adjustable), and Spatz3 (adjustable) IGBs used as a bridge therapy before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods: The data of 148 patients with super-obesity (BMI > 50 kg/m2) who underwent IGB implantation as bridge treatment prior to LSG between July 2018 and December 2022 were analyzed. Patients were allocated according to device availability in consecutive procurement periods: Orbera365 (47 patients), Medsil (53 patients), and Spatz3 (48 patients). Weight loss (kg), BMI reduction, and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) were measured at 6 months. Results: Weight loss after 6 months was greatest in the Spatz3 group (mean 25 kg; median 24.64 kg; 19.46–33.04 kg) compared to the Medsil (mean 16 kg; median 16 kg; 11.7–33 kg) and Orbera365 (mean 14 kg; median 14.53 kg; 11.54–18.26 kg) groups. %EWL and %TWL were also greatest in the Spatz3 group (%EWL: 22.98%; %TWL: 14.0%) compared to the Medsil (%EWL: 15.06%; %TWL: 9.4%) and Orbera365 (%EWL: 13.71%; %TWL: 8.3%) groups. Conclusions: In super-obese patients undergoing a 6-month bridging therapy before LSG, an adjustable IGB with mid-term volume increase achieved greater short-term weight loss than non-adjustable devices. Implications for peri-operative outcomes require confirmation in prospective studies.

17 September 2025 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
TKTomasz Klimczak
Tomasz Klimczak
KSKrzysztof Dominik Słowiński
Krzysztof Dominik Słowiński
AMAlicja Majos
Alicja Majos
JŚJacek Śmigielski
Jacek Śmigielski
WCWojciech Jakub Ciesielski
Wojciech Jakub Ciesielski
Background Bridge therapy before surgery is one of indications for intragastric balloon (IGB) implantation. We aim to compare the outcomes of Medsil (non-adjustable), Orbera 365 (non-adjustable) and SPATZ3 (adjustable) IGB used as a bridge therapy before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods The data of 148 patients with severe obesity (BMI >=50 kg/m2) who underwent IGB implantation as bridge treatment prior to LSG between July 2018 and December 2022 was analysed. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 different IGBs: ORBERA 365 (47 patients), MEDSIL (53 patients), and SPATZ3 (48 patients). Weight loss (kg), BMI reduction and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) were measured at 6 months. Results Weight loss after 6 months was the best in the SPATZ3 group (mean 25 kg; median 24,64 kg; 19,46 – 33,04 kg) compared to Medsil (mean 16 kg; median 16 kg; 11,7 – 33 kg) and ORBERA365 (mean 14 kg; median 14,53 kg; 11,54 – 18,26). Weight loss after 6 months was highest in the SPATZ3 group (mean 25 kg) compared to Medsil (16 kg) and ORBERA365 (14 kg). %EWL and %TWL were also greatest in the SPATZ3 group (%EWL: 22.98%; %TWL: 14.0%) compared to Medsil (%EWL: 15.06%; %TWL: 9.4%) and ORBERA365 (%EWL: 13.71%; %TWL: 8.3%). Conclusion The bridge therapy before LSG with adjustable IGB after 6 months seems to be superior to non-adjustable devices.