Background: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women, responsible for the highest number of cancer-related deaths worldwide. There is limited data available related to serum tumor markers in breast cancer and other blood parameters or other glandular laboratory parameters. This study aims to evaluate the correlation of tumor-specific markers for breast cancer with other blood parameters and how these correlations could impact clinical management. Material and Method: This retrospective study represents a data analysis from 1 January 2020 to 31 May 2023, in the County Hospital of Timisoara, Romania. We reviewed all the cases where, in the laboratory analyses, the serum tumor specific biomarkers for breast cancer were analyzed. Results: A statistical analysis was performed in order to identify a possible relationship between CA 15-3 and the various biomarkers and blood parameters included in the present study. Values were classified according to reference ranges. The tests revealed no statistically significant associations between CA 15-3 values and the levels of CA125 (χ²(1) = 1.852, p = 0.174), CEA (χ²(1) = 1.139, p = 0.286), AFP (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.341), fT4 (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.310), TSH (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.177), or PTH (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.650). Conclusion: The findings indicate a lack of strong correlation between CA 15-3 and CA125, CEA, AFP, thyroid function markers, or PTH within this cohort.

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers and the leading cause of cancer death in women. Less than 1% of breast cancer cases are male breast cancers. Although there has been significant progress made in the management of breast cancer, due to its rarity among men, the question of whether men and women with breast cancer have the same treatment response and survival rate still needs to be answered. The primary goal of this study is to compare survival outcomes between male and female breast cancer patients. Material and Method: This cohort study represents a retrospective and anonymized data analysis of 2162 breast cancer cases (19 males and 2143 females), registered over a period of 12 years, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021, in the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diakoneo Diak Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall, Germany. Results: According to the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, the estimated overall 3-year survival rate was 91.1% for women and 88.9% for men. The log-rank test of equality of survival distributions indicated a statistically significant difference in survival times between the two groups (p = 0.009). In the subsequent age-matched Kaplan–Meier analysis, the p-value was below the significance threshold (p = 0.068). Conclusions: Male breast cancer is a rare disease that may show some particularities in terms of survival compared to female breast cancer.

Background/Objectives: This study evaluates the impact of clinical, pathological, and treatment-related factors on breast cancer recurrence and overall survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Patients and Method: A total of 298 patients treated at Diakoneo Diak Klinikum, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany (2010–2021) were analyzed. Key variables included hormone receptor status, molecular subtypes, tumor grade, treatment protocols, and metastatic disease at diagnosis. Results: Recurrence was strongly associated with metastatic disease (p < 0.001) but not with hormone receptor status or molecular subtypes. Platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy was linked to a lower recurrence risk (p = 0.05) compared to anthracycline-based regimens. Patients with recurrence had significantly lower overall survival (27.91% vs. 8.24%, p < 0.001). Logistic regression suggested a trend toward increased recurrence in ER-positive and PR-negative patients, though not statistically significant. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment strategies and highlight the need for future studies incorporating genomic data and residual disease analysis to refine recurrence risk prediction and therapy selection.

Background/Objectives: Accurate assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is critical for optimizing treatment strategies. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography are commonly used for response evaluation, they have inherent limitations. Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a promising, cost-effective, and real-time alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of US in tracking tumor regression during NAC and its correlation with pathologic tumor regression grade (TRG). Methods: This study included 282 breast cancer patients undergoing NAC. Tumor size was measured using ultrasound at three key time points: pre-chemotherapy, after four cycles, and post-chemotherapy. Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the relationship between US-measured tumor changes and TRG. Multinomial logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine the predictive accuracy of the measurements from our US in identifying pathologic complete response (pCR). Conclusions: Ultrasound is a reliable, real-time imaging tool for monitoring NAC response in breast cancer patients. Its ability to predict pCR and track tumor shrinkage highlights its potential for treatment adaptation. Standardization of US protocols and integration with AI-based analysis may further improve its clinical utility, making it a valuable adjunct in breast cancer treatment monitoring.

Background and Objectives: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women and the most common cause of cancer death. Hormone receptors, specifically the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her2), are tumor-specific markers used to guide breast cancer therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of tumor biology, including ER, PR, and Her2 expression, on survival in female breast cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study represents an analysis of 2016 female breast cancer cases using anonymized data. We reviewed cases of female breast cancer diagnosed from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021, in the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diakoneo Diak Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall, Germany. Data on clinical, pathology, immunohistochemistry, and follow-up characteristics were retrieved from the clinic’s database. To interpret the data, we used the software IBM SPSS Statistics 20, and, to account for multiple comparisons, we used a Bonferroni-adjusted significance level of 0.004. In the survival analysis, the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test of equality of survival distributions were applied. Results: Among 2016 female breast cancer cases, 84.5% (1703/2016) were hormone receptor (HR)-positive. The 5-year overall survival was 0.873 (95% CI (0.851, 0.895); 99.6% CI (0.841, 0.905)) for HR-positive patients and 0.760 (95% CI (0.713, 0.807); 99.6% CI (0.691, 0.829)) for HR-negative patients (p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed among HR+/HER2+, HR+/HER2−, HR−/HER2+, and triple-negative subtypes (p = 0.003). When comparing survival distributions based solely on HER2 expression (positive vs. negative), no statistically significant difference was observed (p = 0.29). Conclusions: Statistically significant differences in unadjusted overall survival distributions were observed among breast cancer molecular subtypes. HR-positive breast cancers demonstrated better overall survival than HR-negative cancers, while no statistically significant difference in unadjusted survival was observed between HER2-positive and HER2-negative groups.