Treatment of congenital femoral deficiency is a complex, multistage protocol and a variety of strategies have been devised to address joint instability, limb length inequality, and deformities. Despite being an important part of the algorithmic approach to the overall treatment of patients with congenital femoral deficiency, a reproducible, safe, and functional treatment for femoral length discrepancy in patients with mild and moderate congenital femoral deficiency has not been reported.
Background The primary goal of this study was to identify nitric oxide (NO)-induced apoptosis in traumatized chondrocytes in intra-articular lower extremity fractures and the secondary goal was to identify the timeline of NO-induced apoptosis after injury. Materials and methods This is a prospective collection of samples of human cartilage harvested at the time of surgery to measure apoptotic cell death and the presence of NO by immunohistochemistry. Three patients met the criteria for control subjects and eight patients sustained high-energy intra-articular fractures and were included in the study. Subjects who sustained intra-articular acetabular, tibial, calcaneal and talus fracture had articular cartilage harvested at the time of surgical intervention. All 8 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the displaced intra-articular fractures. The main outcome measures were rate of apoptosis, degree of NO-induced apoptosis in chondrocytes, and the timeline of NO-induced apoptosis after high-energy trauma. Results The percentage of apoptotic chondrocytes was higher in impacted samples than in normal cartilage (56 vs 4 %), confirming the presence of apoptosis after intra-articular fracture. The percentage of cells with NO was greater in apoptotic cells than in normal cells (59 vs 20 %), implicating NO-induction of apoptosis. The correlation between chondrocyte apoptosis and increasing time from injury was found to be −0.615, indicating a decreasing rate of apoptosis post injury. Conclusions The data showed the involvement of NO-induced apoptosis of chondrocytes after high-energy trauma, which decreased with time from injury.
Background: While sustainable long-term function has been established for biological reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis (DO) following osseous resections, there is a paucity of published data informing surgeons and patients on important milestones in the reconstructive process. The objectives of this study were to determine when to expect complete bone healing and full weight-bearing as well as to quantify the influence of chemotherapy on the osseous regeneration process. Methods: Prospectively, pathological and clinical data were collected for 30 consecutive patients who underwent primary or secondary DO-based reconstruction following osseous resection from 2018 to 2021. Serial radiographs indicated the times to cortex formation and full union. An unpaired t test was used to compare the time required for full bone remodeling of segments transported with and without concurrent chemotherapy. Results: The average resection length was 13.6 cm (range, 4 to 22 cm). Patients underwent an average of 6.1 procedures (range, 1 to 14 procedures). Half (50%) of all procedures were planned, while half were unplanned procedures. All patients achieved full, independent weight-bearing at a median of 12 months (interquartile range [IQR], 9 to 16 months). For the 34 segments transported concurrently with chemotherapy, the mean bone healing index (BHI) was 2.3 ± 0.7, and the mean BHI was 1.2 ± 0.4 for the 25 segments without chemotherapy at any point during their transport (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: All 30 patients achieved full bone healing and independent weight-bearing at a median of 1 year postoperatively and continued to show functional improvement afterward. Surgeons and patients can expect bone healing to be nearly twice as fast for segments transported after completion of systemic chemotherapy compared with segments transported concurrently with adjuvant chemotherapy. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.