Atypical chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is most frequently confused with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Several markers may contribute to the diagnosis of CLL. However, there is no consensus on which markers are needed to be used in flow cytometry for the diagnosis of CLL. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of CD43 and CD200 markers in the differential diagnosis between CLL and MCL. To address this issue, 339 consecutive patients with CLL and MCL were included in the flow cytometry lymphoproliferative disease panel for evaluation of CD43 and CD200 expressions, but not in the Matutes scoring system. CD200 was expressed in 97.3% of atypical CLL cases, whereas it was dimly expressed in only 6.1% of MCL cases. CD43 expression was 95.7% in atypical CLL cases. In the MCL cases, its expression rate was 39.4%. CD43 and CD200 were found to be more valuable markers than CD22, CD79b, and FMC7. CD43 and CD200 could also be considered as definitive markers in atypical CLL patients, for whom the Matutes scoring system remains ineffective.

The scoring system used for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cannot make an accurate diagnosis in some cases. Novel markers are available for the differential diagnosis of CLL, especially from MCL. However, these markers are still not incorporated into diagnostic algorithms. We investigated the role of CD43, CD81, CD200, and ROR1 in the differential diagnosis of CLL and their expression in non-CLL cases. We investigated the role of CD43, CD81, CD20, and ROR1 in the differential diagnosis of CLL by incorporating them into the diagnostic panel after studying peripheral blood or bone marrow samples of 165 patients with 8-color flow cytometry. CD43 positivity was a sensitive marker but had a lower specificity for CLL. CD43 had high diagnostic value for CLL (sensitivity 100%, specificity 88.5%, AUC 98.0%). CD200 was a specific marker for CLL (sensitivity 98%, specificity 90%, AUC: 96%). CD81 expression was highest in the MCL cases, with a median expression rate of 68.5% (range: 54 - 82.5%). It was negative in all the CLL cases. For CLL, CD81 negativity had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 82% and an AUC of 92%. ROR1 was positive in all CLL and MCL cases. CD79b, on the other hand, was a fairly sensitive and specific marker for MCL. CD43, CD81, CD200, and ROR1 should be incorporated into diagnostic algorithms for the differential diagnosis of CLL, especially from MCL.

The prognosis is poor for relapsed or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) patients. The brentuximab vedotin (Bv) and bendamustine (B) combination has been used as a preferable salvage regimen in R/R cHL patient trials. We retrospectively evaluated response rates, toxicities, and the survival in R/R cHL patients treated with the BvB combination. In a multi-centre real-life study, 61 R/R HL patients received intravenous doses of 1.8 mg/kg Bv on the first day plus 90 mg/m² B on the first and second days of a 21-day cycle as a second-line or beyond-salvage regimen. Patients’ median age at BvB initiation was 33 (range: 18–76 years). BvB was given as median third-line treatment for a median of four cycles (range: 2–11). The overall and complete response rates were 82% and 68.9%, respectively. After BvB initiation, the median follow-up was 14 months, and one- and two-year overall survival rates were 85% and 72%, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (24.6%), lymphopenia (40%), thrombocytopenia (13%), anaemia (13%), infusion reactions (8.2%), neuropathy (6.5%), and others. The BvB combination could be given as salvage regimen aiming a bridge to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), in patients relapse after ASCT or to transplant-ineligible patients with manageable toxicity profiles.

The research reported in this paper was designed to study the role of plateled-derived growth factor (PDGF) in Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). The PDGF levels in 9 patients with HD and 12 NHL and in a control group consisting of 20 people, was measured by ELISA method. The PDGF values in the disease group of 19 patients were raised. The values of PDGF in the control group were 28.977+/-9 pg/ml, but were measured at 147.083+/-54 pg/ml in HD group and 131.487+/-56 pg/ml in NHL group (p < 0.01). The observation of a 5-fold increase in PDGF values in the disease group when compared to the control group suggests that PDGF could itself be considered as a possible factor in the pathogenesis of HD and NHL. In order to support this, there is a need to design additional studies monitoring PDGF in larger number of patients at various stages of the disease.