Objective: To examine the clinimetric properties and clinical applicability of published tools for `quantifying' the degree of lateropulsion or pusher syndrome following stroke. Data sources: Search through electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index) with the terms lateropulsion, pushing, pusher syndrome, validity, reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness, sensitivity, specificity, posture and stroke. Databases were searched from their inception to October 2008. Review methods: Abstracts were selected by one author. A panel of experts then determined which should be included in this review. Five abstracts were reviewed and the panel agreed to omit one abstract because those authors did not write a full manuscript. The panel critiqued manuscripts according to predetermined criteria about clinical and clinimetric properties. Results: Four manuscripts referencing three tools for examining lateropulsion were found. Validity and reliability data support the clinical use of the Scale for Contraversive Pushing, the Modified Scale for Contraversive Pushing and the Burke Lateropulsion Scale. The Scale for Contraversive Pushing has the most extensive testing of clinimetric properties. The other tools show promising preliminary evidence of clinical and research utility. More testing is needed with larger, more diverse samples. Reviewers' conclusions: The Scale for Contraversive Pushing, the Modified Scale for Contraversive Pushing and the Burke Lateropulsion Scale are reliable and valid measures with good clinical applicability. Larger, more varied samples should be used to better delineate responsiveness and other clinimetric properties of these examination tools.

Background and Objective . Lateropulsion after stroke has not been tracked using a case-matched controlled study and a standardized lateropulsion scale. Matched pairs of patients with stroke, with and without lateropulsion, were compared for functional outcomes and discharge destination following inpatient rehabilitation. Methods. A retrospective chart review of patients with ischemic stroke at an inpatient rehabilitation hospital matched 36 pairs of patients with versus without lateropulsion. Scores of 2 or greater on the Burke Lateropulsion Scale identified lateropulsion. Matching criteria were side of stroke, sex, age, admission motor Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and interval poststroke. FIM efficiency (change in total FIM/length of stay) and discharge destination were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests. Results. FIM efficiency and discharge FIM scores were lower in the lateropulsion group. Groups had similar mean lengths of stay. Post-hoc analyses showed that only patients with lateropulsion and right brain damage had significantly different FIM efficiency and discharge FIM scores. Lower extremity weakness was greater in the lateropulsion group at discharge; patients with right brain damage accounted for this difference. Patients with lateropulsion required more dependent living situations at discharge, especially if they had right brain damage. Conclusions. Patients with lateropulsion following stroke have a lower FIM efficiency and more dependency at discharge when compared with matched controls with equal functional limitations. Secondary analyses show worse outcomes for the subgroup of patients with right hemisphere stroke; lateropulsion and greater leg weakness may account for differences. Patients with lateropulsion may require longer rehabilitation to reach outcome goals.

Background. Lateropulsion, a postural control disorder, delays recovery following hemispheric stroke. The number of stroke impairments may lead to differential recovery rates, depending on the intact systems available for recovery from lateropulsion. Objective. To study the impact of key postural control deficits on lateropulsion rate of recovery following stroke. Methods. Through retrospective analysis: 169 patients with hemispheric stroke in an in-patient rehabilitation facility were divided into 3 groups: (1) motor deficits only; (2) motor and hemianopic or visual–spatial deficits or motor and proprioceptive deficits; and (3) motor, proprioceptive, and hemianopic or visual–spatial deficits. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis determined if time to recovery from lateropulsion (achieving a score of 0 or 1 on the Burke Lateropulsion Scale) differed by group. Results. Log rank tests showed that time to recovery from lateropulsion differed based on the number of deficits (group, P = .012). Post hoc analyses by lesion side showed that group differences only occurred in right brain lesion (P < .05) as compared with left brain lesions (P = .34). Patients recovered from lateropulsion during in-patient rehabilitation if they had only motor deficits; those with all 3 postural control deficits showed the most protracted recovery. Conclusions. Rate of recovery from lateropulsion after stroke is dependent on the side of lesion, and number of key motor, proprioceptive, and/or hemianopic or visual–spatial deficits. The more postural control systems affected, the slower the recovery. Our data identify patients likely to need protracted rehabilitation targeting key postural control deficits.

Background and Purpose—: Hemispheric stroke studies associating lateropulsion (pusher syndrome) with the location of brain lesions have had mixed results from small, unmatched samples. This study was designed to determine whether lateropulsion localizes to specific brain regions across patients with stroke using a case-control design. Methods—: Fifty patients with lateropulsion after stroke were matched with 50 stroke patients without lateropulsion using age, time since onset of stroke, admission motor Functional Independence Measure score, lesion side, and gender. The primary analysis included multivariate lesion symptom mapping using sparse canonical correlations to identify regions most associated with lateropulsion as assessed with the Burke Lateropulsion Scale. Secondary analyses included evaluating paired comparisons for lesion volume, degree of motor impairment, motor and cognitive Functional Independence Measure scores. Results—: The lesion symptom mapping analysis of all lesions mapped onto a common hemisphere produced an overall significant model ( P <5×10 ^–5 ) with a regional peak at the inferior parietal lobe at the junction of the post-central gyrus (Brodmann Area 2) and Brodmann Area 40 as the lesion location most associated with lateropulsion. Lesion volume was larger for patients with lateropulsion. Despite adequate matching, motor performance and total Functional Independence Measure scores differed at a group level between patients with and without lateropulsion. Conclusions—: This analysis implicated lesion involvement of the inferior parietal lobe as a key neuroanatomical determinant of developing lateropulsion. A better understanding of the anatomic underpinnings of lateropulsion may improve rehabilitation efforts, including the potential for informing noninvasive neuromodulation approaches.