VENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA

Dr. VENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA

Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PYPooja Yadav
Pooja Yadav
DADimitris Athanassiadis
Dimitris Athanassiadis
DADalia Abdelfattah
Dalia Abdelfattah
MTMats Tysklind
Mats Tysklind
VUVENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA
VENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA
Increasing demand for biofuel production and global competition for the use of natural resources are key factors in finding new and environmentally safe routes for methanol production. In the present study, life cycle assessment was used to analyse the potential environmental impact and environmental cost of a novel methanol production process from wood compared to a conventional processes. Both the novel and the conventional process were divided into three stages: pre-treatment, gasification, and syngas cleaning and methanol synthesis. The environmental impacts were assessed and compared using Simapro 9 (ecoinvent 3.5 database) and the ReCiPe 2016 (World-H) midpoint method. The results, expressed per tonne methanol, showed that the impact categories of global warming potential (GWP) and marine ecotoxicity potential were lower in the novel process in comparison to the conventional process (48.2 kg CO2 eq. vs. 63.1 kg CO2 eq., and 4.55 kg 1,4-DCB vs. 6.35 kg 1,4-DCB respectively). However, the novel process had a higher environmental impact in the pre-treatment stage. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the GWP of the novel process increased from 48.2 kg CO2 eq. to 216 kg CO2 eq. due to the replacement of Na2CO3 by K2CO3. The human toxicity impact categories showed significant impact on environmental cost. These findings will help relevant industries to reduce their environmental impact and improve the production efficiency of methanol from wood.

4 January 2022 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VUVENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA
VENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA
VGVenkataramana Gadhamshetty
Venkataramana Gadhamshetty
DADimitris Athanassiadis
Dimitris Athanassiadis
MTMats Tysklind
Mats Tysklind
FMFanran Meng
Fanran Meng
DYDalia M.M. Yacout
Dalia M.M. Yacout

31 January 2019 in ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKavitha Shanmugam
Kavitha Shanmugam
VGVenkataramana Gadhamshetty
Venkataramana Gadhamshetty
PYPooja Yadav
Pooja Yadav
DADimitris Athanassiadis
Dimitris Athanassiadis
MTMats Tysklind
Mats Tysklind
VUVENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA
VENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA

7 February 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRicardo Luís Teles De Carvalho
Ricardo Luís Teles De Carvalho
PYPooja Yadav
Pooja Yadav
NGNatxo García-López
Natxo García-López
RLRobert Lindgren
Robert Lindgren
GNGert Nyberg
Gert Nyberg
DADimitris Athanassiadis
Dimitris Athanassiadis
Over 640 million people in Africa are expected to rely on solid-fuels for cooking by 2040. In Western Kenya, cooking inefficiently persists as a major cause of burden of disease due to household air pollution. Efficient biomass cooking is a local-based renewable energy solution to address this issue. The Life-Cycle Assessment tool Simapro 8.5 is applied for analyzing the environmental impact of four biomass cooking strategies for the Kisumu County, with analysis based on a previous energy modelling study, and literature and background data from the Ecoinvent and Agrifootprint databases applied to the region. A Business-As-Usual scenario (BAU) considers the trends in energy use until 2035. Transition scenarios to Improved Cookstoves (ICS), Pellet-fired Gasifier Stoves (PGS) and Biogas Stoves (BGS) consider the transition to wood-logs, biomass pellets and biogas, respectively. An Integrated (INT) scenario evaluates a mix of the ICS, PGS and BGS. In the BGS, the available biomass waste is sufficient to be upcycled and fulfill cooking demands by 2035. This scenario has the lowest impact on all impact categories analyzed followed by the PGS and INT. Further work should address a detailed socio-economic analysis of the analyzed scenarios.

2 August 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKavitha Shanmugam
Kavitha Shanmugam
ABAnju Baroth
Anju Baroth
SNSachin Nande
Sachin Nande
DYDalia M. M. Yacout
Dalia M. M. Yacout
MTMats Tysklind
Mats Tysklind
VUVENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA
VENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA
Cities in developing nations have to deal with two significant sustainability challenges amidst rampant urbanization. First, consumer-generated food waste is increasing monumentally since open dumping is still followed as a predominant practice, the negative environmental externalities associated with food waste disposal are growing beyond manageable proportions. Second, the dependency on conventional fuels like diesel to operate transit buses, which is one of the major causes for deteriorating urban air quality. A nexus established between food waste management and operation of transit buses can improve the sustainable performance of cities in developing nations. In this study, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) supported Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (SCBA) is performed by considering a hypothetical scenario of establishing a large food waste treating biomethanation plant in Mumbai, India. The food waste from the city is transported to a biomethanation plant where it is subjected to an anaerobic digestion (AD) process. The biogas produced as a byproduct is upgraded to compressed biomethane (CBM) and used as a vehicle fuel to operate transit buses within the city. The LCA results suggest that CBM buses can reduce greenhouse gas and particulate matter emissions by 60% compared to diesel or compressed natural gas (CNG) buses. Fossil depletion potential of CBM buses is 98% lower than diesel, suggesting CBM’s importance in decoupling developing nations dependency on imported crude oil. The SCBA considers: (a) costs to stakeholders, i.e., fees for open dumping of food waste and cost of fuel for operating transit buses; and (b) social costs incurred by negative environmental externalities (obtained by monetizing LCA results) resulting from both, open dumping as well as fuel combustion. SCBA results indicate that the food waste-based CBM model can save 6.86 billion Indian rupees (USD 99.4 million) annually for Mumbai. The savings are made due to a reduction in stakeholder’s costs (fuel) coupled with societal, i.e., environmental externality costs if entire transit bus fleet operates on CBM fuel instead of conventional fuel mix (33:67 diesel to CNG) currently used. Although the study is performed for Mumbai, the results will be replicable to any city of developing nations facing similar issues.

7 January 2014 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VUVENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA
VENKATA KRISHNA UPADHYAYULA
DMDavid E. Meyer
David E. Meyer
MCMary Curran
Mary Curran
MGMichael A. Gonzalez
Michael A. Gonzalez