Accurate estimation of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) is essential for optimizing photovoltaic (PV) systems, particularly in regions with distinct climatic characteristics. Geostationary satellites, such as GK2A and COMS, provide consistent and spatially extensive data, offering a practical alternative to ground-based measurements. However, the performance of semi-empirical GHI models has been sparsely evaluated across diverse geographic zones. This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of four semi-empirical models—Beyer, Rigollier, Hammer, and Perez—applied to two contrasting locations: Seoul, South Korea (temperate) and Jakarta, Indonesia (tropical). Using satellite-derived cloud indices and ground-based pyranometer data, model performance was evaluated via RMSE, MBE, and their relative metrics. Results indicate that the Hammer model achieves the best performance in Seoul (RMSE: 103.92 W/m²; MBE: 0.09 W/m²), while the Perez model outperforms others in Jakarta with the lowest relative RMSE of 58.69%. The analysis outlines the limitations of transferring models calibrated in temperate climates to tropical settings without regional adaptation. This study provides critical insights for improving satellite-based GHI estimation and supports the development of region-specific forecasting tools essential for expanding solar infrastructure in Southeast Asia.

Accurate estimation of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) is essential for optimizing photovoltaic (PV) systems, particularly in regions with distinct climatic characteristics. Geostationary satellites, such as GK2A and COMS, provide consistent and spatially extensive data, offering a practical alternative to ground-based measurements. However, the performance of semi-empirical GHI models has been sparsely evaluated across diverse geographic zones. This study conducts a comparative analysis of four semi-empirical models—Beyer, Rigollier, Hammer, and Perez—applied to two contrasting locations: Seoul, South Korea (temperate) and Jakarta, Indonesia (tropical). Using satellite-derived cloud indices and ground-based pyranometer data, model performance was evaluated via RMSE, MBE, and their relative metrics. Results indicate that the Hammer model achieves the best performance in Seoul (RMSE: 103.92 W/m²; MBE: 0.09 W/m²), while the Perez model outperforms others in Jakarta with the lowest relative RMSE of 58.69%. The analysis highlights the limitations of transferring models calibrated in temperate climates to tropical settings without regional adaptation. This study provides critical insights for improving satellite-based GHI estimation and supports the development of region-specific forecasting tools essential for expanding solar infrastructure in Southeast Asia.

Accurate and spatially representative estimation of Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) is critical for solar energy planning in tropical regions characterized by strong atmospheric variability and complex topography. This study aims to evaluate the performance and robustness of four semi-empirical satellite-derived GHI models, Beyer, Perez, Hammer, and Rigollier, under heterogeneous tropical conditions in West Java, Indonesia. Hourly GHI data for 2022 were derived from GK2A satellite observations and validated against ground measurements from eight stations representing coastal, lowland, and mountainous areas. Model performance was assessed at annual and seasonal scales using relative Root Mean Square Error (rRMSE) and relative Mean Bias Error (rMBE). The results show significant variability in model performance across locations, with the average annual rRMSE computed per model and averaged over the eight stations being similar among models: 41.10% (Perez), 41.18% (Beyer), 42.44% (Hammer), and 42.49% (Rigollier). Perez showed the most consistent performance, with station-level rRMSE values ranging from 35.36% to 43.32% and rMBE ranging from −18.20% to 22.09%. Seasonal analysis indicates higher errors during the rainy season, 41.16% (Perez), 45.23% (Beyer), 42.74% (Hammer), and 46.34% (Rigollier), while lower errors were observed during the dry season, particularly for Beyer (36.16%) and Rigollier (36.29%). Spatial analysis indicates higher irradiance in coastal and lowland areas compared to mountainous regions. These findings emphasize the importance of climate- and topography-aware model selection for reliable solar resource assessment in tropical environments.