The combination of 3D printing and navigation promises improvements in surgical procedures and outcomes for complex bone tumor resection of the trunk, but its features have rarely been described in the literature. Five patients with trunk tumors were surgically treated in our institution using a combination of 3D printing and navigation. The main process includes segmentation, virtual modeling and build preparation, as well as quality assessment. Tumor resection was performed with navigated instruments. Preoperative planning supported clear margin multiplanar resections with intraoperatively adaptable real-time visualization of navigated instruments. The follow-up ranged from 2–15 months with a good functional result. The present results and the review of the current literature reflect the trend and the diverse applications of 3D printing in the medical field. 3D printing at hospital sites is often not standardized, but regulatory aspects may serve as disincentives. However, 3D printing has an increasing impact on precision medicine, and we are convinced that our process represents a valuable contribution in the context of patient-centered individual care.

Background/Objectives: In reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), precise K-wire positioning of the glenoid component is critical to prevent complications such as glenoid loosening or instability as well as premature implant failure. Optimal component placement must adhere to individualized preoperative plans to account for patient-specific anatomical conditions. Conventional methods often fail to achieve this level of accuracy, undermining the need for personalized medicine. Intraoperative navigation systems are growing in use to improve accuracy in orthopedic surgery. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of K-wire positioning in a 3D-printed model of the scapula using conventional versus navigated methods. Methods: We recruited 20 participants: 10 experienced surgeons and 10 inexperienced medical students. Each participant performed four K-wire drillings—two with conventional instruments and two with an intraoperative navigation system. A novel target system, BoneTrack3D, was used to measure accuracy. We assessed the absolute deviation of the entry and exit points as well as the three-dimensional drilling angle. Results: The navigated method was significantly more accurate for all measured parameters at a family-wise significance level of α = 0.05. The median absolute deviation for the entry point was 1.6 mm with navigation versus 3.0 mm with the conventional method (p < 0.001). Similarly, the exit point deviation was 1.8 mm with navigation versus 6.7 mm conventionally (p < 0.001). The drilling angle deviation also showed significant improvement with navigation, at 2.6° compared to 8.9° conventionally (p < 0.001). However, the navigated method took longer, with a median drilling time of 100.0 s compared to 55.0 s for the conventional method (p < 0.001). The navigated method provided consistent and superior results regardless of a participant’s surgical experience. Conclusions: Navigated techniques for K-wire positioning in RSA demonstrate enhanced accuracy in a 3D-printed model, effectively executing a precise, patient-specific preoperative plan. This could be a direct contribution to personalized medicine, ensuring the final implant alignment is tailored to the individual’s anatomy. Furthermore, intraoperative navigation may contribute to a flatter learning curve, thereby increasing accessibility for surgeons with varying levels of experience. Although navigation introduces additional costs and longer initial procedure times, these drawbacks could be offset by improved technical outcomes and a reduced risk of complications. Future studies, including randomized clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses, should seek to validate these results in clinical settings with longer follow-up periods and larger patient cohorts to define long-term value and utility of navigation systems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.