Janine Clayton

Janine Clayton


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 November 2016 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJanine Clayton
Janine Clayton
CTCara Tannenbaum
Cara Tannenbaum
This Viewpoint offers guidance for how to report sex and gender characteristics of study participants in medical research articles.

1 July 2017 in The Ocular Surface
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDavid A. Sullivan
David A. Sullivan
Eduardo RochaEduardo Rocha
Eduardo Rocha
PAPasquale Aragona
Pasquale Aragona
JCJanine Clayton
Janine Clayton
JDJuan Ding
Juan Ding
Mark WillcoxMark Willcox
Mark Willcox

7 June 2018 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJanine Clayton
Janine Clayton
Dry eye is a common, painful ocular disturbance that can result from systemic inflammatory diseases, localized eye problems, or commonly used medications. Current treatments address symptoms, but advances in understanding tear-film function may lead to new approaches.

10 June 2020 in Journal of Women's Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMatthew E. Arnegard
Matthew E. Arnegard
LWLori A. Whitten
Lori A. Whitten
CHChyren Hunter
Chyren Hunter
JCJanine Clayton
Janine Clayton
A little over 5 years ago, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced the intention to develop policies to require applicants to report plans to balance male and female cells and animals in preclinical investigations. Soon thereafter, the NIH issued a request for information from the scientific community and consulted with various stakeholders. The feedback received was considered during development of policy requiring the consideration of sex as a biological variable (SABV) in NIH-funded research on vertebrate animals and humans, which went into effect for applications due on or after January 25, 2016. We identified NIH programs related to SABV and reviewed SABV-relevant scientific literature. We find that the application of SABV throughout the research process can serve as a guiding principle to improve the value of biomedical science. The NIH is engaged in ongoing efforts to develop resources to help investigators consider SABV in their research. We also provide an update on lessons learned, highlight ways that different disciplines consider SABV, and describe the opportunities for scientific discovery that applying SABV offers. We call on NIH's various stakeholders to redouble their efforts to integrate SABV throughout the biomedical research enterprise. Sex- and gender-aware investigations are critical to the conduct of rigorous and transparent science and the advancement of personalized medicine. This kind of research achieves its greatest potential when sex and gender considerations are integrated into the biomedical research enterprise in an end-to-end manner, from basic and preclinical investigations, through translational and clinical research, to improved health care delivery.

29 October 2015 in The FASEB Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJanine Clayton
Janine Clayton
In May 2014, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced that it will ensure that investigators account for sex as a biological variable (SABV) in NIH‐funded preclinical research as part of the agency's rigor and transparency initiative. Herein, I describe in more detail the rationale behind the SABV policy component and provide additional detail about policy goals. In short, studying both sexes is a guiding principle in biomedical research that will expand knowledge toward turning discovery into health. NIH expects that considering SABV in preclinical research will help to build a knowledge base that better informs the design of clinical research and trials in humans. Integrating the practice of studying both sexes in preclinical research will, over time, expand our currently incomplete knowledge base that plays a critical role in informing the development of sex‐and gender‐appropriate medical care for women and men.—Clayton, J. A. Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine. FASEB J. 30, 519‐524 (2016). www.fasebj.org

1 April 2018 in Physiology & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJanine Clayton
Janine Clayton
Sex as a biological variable (SABV) is a key part of the new National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiative to enhance reproducibility through rigor and transparency. The SABV policy requires researchers to factor sex into the design, analysis, and reporting of vertebrate animal and human studies. The policy was implemented as it has become increasingly clear that male/female differences extend well beyond reproductive and hormonal issues. Implementation of the policy is also meant to address inattention to sex influences in biomedical research. Sex affects: cell physiology, metabolism, and many other biological functions; symptoms and manifestations of disease; and responses to treatment. For example, sex has profound influences in neuroscience, from circuitry to physiology to pain perception. Extending beyond the robust efforts of NIH to ensure that women are included in clinical trials, the SABV policy also includes rigorous preclinical experimental designs that inform clinical research. Additionally, the NIH has engaged journal editors and publishers to facilitate reproducibility by addressing rigor and promoting transparency through scientifically appropriate sex-specific study results reporting. The Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines were developed to assist researchers and journal editors in reporting sex and gender information in publications [1].