Background: The omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial for patients with residual axillary disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), regardless of the residual burden. This study evaluated the oncologic safety and factors associated with outcomes in patients with residual axillary disease. These patients were treated solely with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection (TAD), without ALND, after NAC.Methods: A joint analysis of two different multicenter cohorts—the retrospective cohort registry MF18‐02 and the prospective observational cohort registry MF18‐03 (NCT04250129)—was conducted between January 2004 and August 2022. All patients received regional nodal irradiation.Results: Five hundred and one patients with cT1‐4, N1‐3M0 disease who achieved a complete clinical response to NAC underwent either SLNB alone (n = 353) or TAD alone (n = 148). At a median follow‐up of 42 months, axillary and locoregional recurrence rates were 0.4% (n = 2) and 0.8% (n = 4). No significant difference was found in disease‐free survival (DFS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) rates between patients undergoing TAD alone versus SLNB alone, those with breast positive versus negative pathologic complete response, SLN methodology, total metastatic LN of one versus ≥2, or metastasis types as isolated tumor cells with micrometastases versus macrometastases. In the multivariate analysis, patients with nonluminal pathology were more likely to have a worse DFS and DSS, respectively, without an increased axillary recurrence.Conclusions: The omission of ALND can be safely considered for patients who achieve a complete clinical response after NAC, even if residual disease is detected by pathologic examination. Provided that adjuvant radiotherapy is administered, neither the SLNB method nor the number of excised LNs significantly affects oncologic outcomes.

Background: Thyroidectomy constitutes an important portion of endocrine surgery procedures and is associated with various complications such as bleeding, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and postoperative hypoparathyroidsm. Effective parathyroid preservation during thyroid surgery is crucial for patient well-being, with current strategies heavily reliant on surgeon experience. Among various methods, Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICGA) offers a promising method for intraoperative assessment of parathyroid gland perfusion. Methods: In a retrospective study, patients undergoing bilateral thyroidectomy from January 2021 to January 2023 were analyzed, excluding those with previous thyroidectomy, parathyroid disease, or chronic kidney disease. The study compared a control group (n = 175) with an ICGA group (n = 120), using propensity score matching for statistical analysis. Matched cohorts included 120 patients in each group. The primary outcome of this study was identified as temporary postoperative hypoparathyroidism, with secondary outcomes including the rate of parathyroid reimplantation and the incidence of permanent postoperative hypoparathyroidism. Results: The ICGA group showed significantly more parathyroid autotransplantations (p < 0.01). While not statistically significant, the control group had a higher incidence of temporary postoperative hypoparathyroidism (p < 0.09). Rates of hypocalcemia on postoperative day 1 and permanent hypocalcemia were similar. Subgroup analysis indicated more postoperative day 1 hypoparathyroidism in the control group during central neck dissections (p < 0.049). Conclusions: Intraoperative ICGA use correlated with higher parathyroid autotransplantation and suggested reduced postoperative hypoparathyroidism. Changes in fluorescence intensity following a second ICG injection may provide an objective method to assess parathyroid perfusion. Further large-scale studies are needed to fully understand ICGA’s impact on parathyroid preservation.

Objectives: This study was designed to investigate the possible relationship between the anatomical location of the PFF (head-neck fractures) and the demographic features, comorbidities, and risk factors of elderly patients. Methods: 233 patients aged 65 years and over, who were admitted to the emergency department with a diagnosis of proximal femur fracture were included in this study. Results: Most patients (59.6%) had a trochanteric fracture. The incidence of trochanteric fractures had a statistically significant positive correlation with age. Falls at ground level were found to be highly associated with trochanteric fractures (92,8%). At least one complication was observed in 57 (41,0%) cases and 31 (22,3%) died in one year, of the patients with trochanteric fractures. Comorbidity was not related to fracture location statistically. Fall ground level (p = 0.013), complication rate (73.7%; p <0.001), and Charlesen comorbidity index (p = 0.019) were statistically significantly associated with death. The logistic regression analysis of variables determined that only the quantity of comorbidities may be related to femoral neck fractures (p = 0.047). Conclusion: Female patients with trochanteric fractures were found to be older than male patients. Fall ground level, mortality, and complications were more frequently seen in patients with trochanteric fractures. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective study.

Trauma is the sixth leading cause of death globally and the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in young patients. Blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries are rare, occuring in only 1-5% of blunt abdominal traumas, and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. In this report, we present a case of a patient with sigmoid colon perforation due to ischemia caused by mesenteric injury, who was admitted to the hospital with abdominal pain two days after a car accident. A twenty-one-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain and vomiting, having been involved in a car accident as a driver two days prior. Computed tomogra-phy revealed free air in the abdomen, originating from the perforation of the sigmoid colon wall, and free fluid in the pelvic area. The patient underwent immediate laparotomy. Exploration revealed a rupture in the sigmoid mesocolon, causing ischemia and perforation. Additionally, there was a rupture in the mesentery of the terminal ileum close to the ileocecal valve, but without ischemia. Partial sig-moid colon and ileal resections were performed, followed by colocolic anastomosis and double-barrel ileostomy. He was discharged in good health after a 20-day hospital stay. Thorough clinical examination and radiological evaluation can aid in detecting visceral injuries in trauma patients. Early recognition and repair of intestinal damage can prevent severe complications.

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Despite the availability of screening services, participation remains suboptimal in Türkiye, and evidence on the determinants of screening behaviors and men’s supportive role is limited. This study aimed to assess BC awareness among women and men, identify factors associated with screening behaviors, and explore men’s attitudes toward supporting their partners’ participation in screening. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between June 2022 and December 2024 using a convenience sampling approach among 725 participants at Koç University Hospital and affiliated institutions. The questionnaire developed by the authors based on a literature review was administered either in person or via email. Sociodemographic characteristics, health literacy, knowledge of risk factors and symptoms, screening behaviors, and self-breast examination practices were assessed through structured questionnaires. Results: Knowledge of breast cancer screening was high, with 90.5% of women recognizing that mammography enables early detection. However, among women aged ≥40 years, only 69.6% had undergone at least one mammogram. Screening uptake was significantly higher among women with a family or social history of breast cancer than among those without (70.6% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.002). The most frequently reported barriers to screening were the absence of symptoms (56.0%), negligence (30.3%), and difficulties accessing healthcare services (17.1%). Although 81.0% of women reported performing breast self-examination, only 22.9% did so monthly, as recommended. Among men, awareness of breast cancer symptoms was moderate, while 87.8% reported supporting their partners’ participation in screening. Conclusion: Improving access to screening services and addressing barriers such as neglect and the absence of symptoms may increase breast cancer screening uptake in Türkiye. Engaging partners and families in awareness initiatives could further support participation and facilitate earlier detection.

Background/Objectives: Clinical scores are recommended for excluding acute appendicitis without imaging, but their rule-out thresholds were derived in patients selected on suspicion of appendicitis. This study tested whether these thresholds retain their reported sensitivity in patients selected by CT performance, estimated the incremental diagnostic value of successive layers of clinical information, and, as an exploratory aim, compared machine learning models with the scores. Methods: This single centre retrospective cohort comprised 761 emergency department patients undergoing abdominal CT for acute abdominal pain. The Alvarado score, the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score and the Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) were reconstructed from data documented before CT. The reference standard was histopathology in operated patients and the index CT report with the clinical course otherwise. Models were fitted to five cumulative information layers by cross-validation, with nested algorithm selection and a temporal split. Results: Appendicitis was confirmed in 178 patients (23.4%). Sensitivity at the recommended thresholds was 0.680 (95% CI 0.609 to 0.751), 0.848 (0.791 to 0.899) and 0.697 (0.628 to 0.764), against published values of 0.99, 0.95 and 0.959, leaving 57, 27 and 54 confirmed cases in the low probability strata, and the shortfall was present in both temporal periods. Discrimination was preserved, with areas under the curve of 0.848, 0.868 and 0.881. Model discrimination rose from 0.874 with symptoms to 0.918 with laboratory values, with each increment conditional on the preceding layers and the pattern similar with a single algorithm held fixed. With nested selection, the model was not distinguishable from the AAS, and in the later temporal period its deferral threshold attained a sensitivity of 0.925. Conclusions: In a population defined by imaging rather than by clinical suspicion, the recommended rule-out thresholds did not translate. Thresholds should be re-derived and verified in the population in which imaging is to be deferred. The model analysis was exploratory and was not externally validated.