Several studies in recent years have demonstrated that gut microbiota–host interactions play an important role in human health and disease, including inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases. Dysbiosis has been linked to not only well-known inflammatory diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematous, but also to cardiovascular risk factors, such as atherosclerosis, hypertension, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The ways the microbiota is involved in modulating cardiovascular risk are multiple and not only related to inflammatory mechanisms. Indeed, human and the gut microbiome cooperate as a metabolically active superorganism, and this affects host physiology through metabolic pathways. In turn, congestion of the splanchnic circulation associated with heart failure, edema of the intestinal wall, and altered function and permeability of the intestinal barrier result in the translocation of bacteria and their products into the systemic circulation, further enhancing the pro-inflammatory conditions underlying cardiovascular disorders. The aim of the present review is to describe the complex interplay between gut microbiota, its metabolites, and the development and evolution of cardiovascular diseases. We also discuss the possible interventions intended to modulate the gut microbiota to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Long COVID, a condition characterized by symptom and/or sign persistence following an acute COVID-19 episode, is associated with reduced physical performance and endothelial dysfunction. Supplementation of l-arginine may improve endothelial and muscle function by stimulating nitric oxide synthesis. A single-blind randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in adults aged between 20 and 60 years with persistent fatigue attending a post-acute COVID-19 outpatient clinic. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive twice-daily orally either a combination of 1.66 g l-arginine plus 500 mg liposomal vitamin C or a placebo for 28 days. The primary outcome was the distance walked on the 6 min walk test. Secondary outcomes were handgrip strength, flow-mediated dilation, and fatigue persistence. Fifty participants were randomized to receive either l-arginine plus vitamin C or a placebo. Forty-six participants (median (interquartile range) age 51 (14), 30 [65%] women), 23 per group, received the intervention to which they were allocated and completed the study. At 28 days, l-arginine plus vitamin C increased the 6 min walk distance (+30 (40.5) m; placebo: +0 (75) m, p = 0.001) and induced a greater improvement in handgrip strength (+3.4 (7.5) kg) compared with the placebo (+1 (6.6) kg, p = 0.03). The flow-mediated dilation was greater in the active group than in the placebo (14.3% (7.3) vs. 9.4% (5.8), p = 0.03). At 28 days, fatigue was reported by two participants in the active group (8.7%) and 21 in the placebo group (80.1%; p < 0.0001). l-arginine plus vitamin C supplementation improved walking performance, muscle strength, endothelial function, and fatigue in adults with long COVID. This supplement may, therefore, be considered to restore physical performance and relieve persistent symptoms in this patient population.

The global action against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, shed light on endothelial dysfunction. Although SARS-CoV-2 primarily affects the pulmonary system, multiple studies have documented pan-vascular involvement in COVID-19. The virus is able to penetrate the endothelial barrier, damaging it directly or indirectly and causing endotheliitis and multi-organ injury. Several mechanisms cooperate to development of endothelial dysfunction, including endothelial cell injury and pyroptosis, hyperinflammation and cytokine storm syndrome, oxidative stress and reduced nitric oxide bioavailability, glycocalyx disruption, hypercoagulability, and thrombosis. After acute-phase infection, some patients reported signs and symptoms of a systemic disorder known as long COVID, in which a broad range of cardiovascular (CV) disorders emerged. To date, the exact pathophysiology of long COVID remains unclear: in addition to the persistence of acute-phase infection mechanisms, specific pathways of CV damage have been postulated, such as persistent viral reservoirs in the heart or an autoimmune response to cardiac antigens through molecular mimicry. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the main molecular patterns of enduring endothelial activation following SARS-CoV-2 infection and to offer the latest summary of CV complications in long COVID.

Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is the in the background of multiple metabolic diseases and a key process in liver disease progression and cirrhosis decompensation. ED affects liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) in response to different damaging agents, causing their progressive dedifferentiation, unavoidably associated with an increase in intrahepatic resistance that leads to portal hypertension and hyperdynamic circulation with increased cardiac output and low peripheral artery resistance. These changes are driven by a continuous interplay between different hepatic cell types, invariably leading to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, increased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, with a subsequent loss of proper vascular tone regulation and fibrosis development. ED evaluation is often accomplished by serum markers and the flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurement of the brachial artery to assess its NO-dependent response to shear stress, which usually decreases in ED. In the context of liver cirrhosis, the ED assessment could help understand the complex hemodynamic changes occurring in the early and late stages of the disease. However, the instauration of a hyperdynamic state and the different NO bioavailability in intrahepatic and systemic circulation—often defined as the NO paradox—must be considered confounding factors during FMD analysis. The primary purpose of this review is to describe the main features of ED and highlight the key findings of the dynamic and intriguing relationship between ED and liver disease. We will also focus on the significance of FMD evaluation in this setting, pointing out its key role as a therapeutic target in the never-ending battle against liver cirrhosis progression.

Chronic venous disease (CVD) involves complex pathophysiological mechanisms, particularly an imbalance between matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs), contributing to venous remodeling and varicosities. Elevated MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels are commonly found in tissues affected by venous ulcers. Inflammation plays a central role in CVD, with higher levels of pro-inflammatory markers present in varicose veins compared to healthy ones. Syndecans, key components of the endothelial glycocalyx, are involved in inflammatory responses. Alterations in the glycocalyx structure are associated with vascular damage in both venous and arterial diseases. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory changes in CVD patients, focusing on glycocalyx damage and the therapeutic role of mesoglycan, a glycosaminoglycan-based drug. A prospective, monocentric study included 23 patients with C2 clinical–etiological–anatomical–pathological (CEAP) CVD. Serum samples were collected before and after mesoglycan treatment. Results showed significantly elevated levels of VCAM-1, MMP-2, MMP-9, SDC-1, IL-6, and IL-8 in blood from varicose veins versus the systemic circulation. Patients received 50 mg of mesoglycan orally every 12 h for 90 days. After treatment, a notable reduction in inflammatory markers was observed. These results support the hypothesis that mesoglycan may alleviate both local and systemic inflammation, providing insights into new therapeutic strategies for CVD management.

Background: Patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) need anticoagulation (AC) therapy for at least 3/6 months (primary treatment); after that period, they should receive a decision on the duration of therapy. Methods: This study examined the complications occurring during two years of follow-up (FU) in patients with a first VTE who were recruited in 20 clinical centers and had discontinued or prolonged AC. They were included in the START2-POST-VTE prospective observational study. Results: A total of 720 patients (53.5% males) who, after the completion of primary treatment, had received the decision to continue (n = 281, 39%; 76.1% with a DOAC) or discontinue (n = 439, 61%) AC were followed up for 2 years (total FU = 1318 years). The decision to prolong or suspend AC was made in similar proportions in patients with unprovoked or provoked index events. Courses of sulodexide treatment or Aspirin (100 mg daily) were prescribed to 20.3% and 4.5%, respectively, of the patients who discontinued AC. The bleeding rate was significantly higher in patients who extended AC (1.6% pt/y) than in those who stopped AC (0.1% pt/y; p = 0.001) and was higher in patients using standard-dose DOACs (3.1% pt/y) than in those using reduced-dose DOACs (0.4% pt/y). The recurrent VTE rates were similar between the two groups (2.2% pt/y during AC vs. 3% pt/y off AC). Conclusion: Physicians’ decisions about AC duration were independent of the unprovoked/provoked nature of the index event. The bleeding rate was higher in patients who continued AC using standard-dose DOACs. Surprisingly, the rate of thrombotic recurrence was not different between those who continued or discontinued AC. Randomized studies comparing different procedures to decide on the duration of AC after a first VTE are needed.