George Guice

Mr. George Guice

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 September 2018 in Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGeorge Guice
George Guice
IMIain McDonald
Iain McDonald
HHHannah Hughes
Hannah Hughes
DSDenis M. Schlatter
Denis M. Schlatter
KGKathryn Goodenough
Kathryn Goodenough
JFJohn Faithfull
John Faithfull
The relative depletion of high field strength elements (HFSE), such as Nb, Ta and Ti, on normalised trace-element plots is a geochemical proxy routinely used to fingerprint magmatic processes linked to Phanerozoic subduction. This proxy has increasingly been applied to ultramafic-mafic units in Archaean cratons, but as these assemblages have commonly been affected by high-grade metamorphism and hydrothermal alteration/metasomatism, the likelihood of element mobility is high relative to Phanerozoic examples. To assess the validity of HFSE anomalies as a reliable proxy for Archaean subduction, we here investigate their origin in ultramafic rocks from the Ben Strome Complex, which is a 7 km2 ultramafic-mafic complex in the Lewisian Gneiss Complex of NW Scotland. Recently interpreted as a deformed layered intrusion, the Ben Strome Complex has been subject to multiple phases of high-grade metamorphism, including separate granulite- and amphibolite-facies deformation events. Additional to bulk-rock geochemistry, we present detailed petrography, and major- and trace-element mineral chemistry for 35 ultramafic samples, of which 15 display negative HFSE anomalies. Our data indicate that the magnitude of HFSE anomalies in the Ben Strome Complex are correlated with light rare earth-element (LREE) enrichment likely generated during interaction with H2O and CO2-rich hydrothermal fluids associated with amphibolitisation, rather than primary magmatic (subduction-related) processes. Consequently, we consider bulk-rock HFSE anomalies alone to be an unreliable proxy for Archaean subduction in Archaean terranes that have experienced multiple phases of high-grade metamorphism, with a comprehensive assessment of element mobility and petrography a minimum requirement prior to assigning geodynamic interpretations to bulk-rock geochemical data.

1 July 2018 in Precambrian Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GGGeorge Guice
George Guice
IMIain McDonald
Iain McDonald
HHHannah S.R. Hughes
Hannah S.R. Hughes
JMJohn MacDonald
John MacDonald
TBThomas G. Blenkinsop
Thomas G. Blenkinsop
RGRobert J. Gooday
Robert J. Gooday

1 May 2019 in Lithos
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GGGeorge Guice
George Guice
IMIain McDonald
Iain McDonald
HHHannah S.R. Hughes
Hannah S.R. Hughes
CACarl R. Anhaeusser
Carl R. Anhaeusser

1 September 2022 in Geoscience Frontiers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMarco Aurélio Piacentini Pinheiro
Marco Aurélio Piacentini Pinheiro
GGGeorge Guice
George Guice
JMJoana Reis Magalhães
Joana Reis Magalhães

5 February 2021 in Geosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGeorge Guice
George Guice
MAMichael R. Ackerson
Michael R. Ackerson
RHRobert M. Holder
Robert M. Holder
FGFreya R. George
Freya R. George
JBJoseph F. Browning-Hanson
Joseph F. Browning-Hanson
DVDaniel R. Viete
Daniel R. Viete
Suprasubduction zone (SSZ) ophiolites of the northern Appalachians (eastern North America) have provided key constraints on the fundamental tectonic processes responsible for the evolution of the Appalachian orogen. The central and southern Appalachians, which extend from southern New York to Alabama (USA), also contain numerous ultramafic-mafic bodies that have been interpreted as ophiolite fragments; however, this interpretation is a matter of debate, with the origin(s) of such occurrences also attributed to layered intrusions. These disparate proposed origins, alongside the range of possible magmatic affinities, have varied potential implications for the magmatic and tectonic evolution of the central and southern Appalachian orogen and its relationship with the northern Appalachian orogen. We present the results of field observations, petrography, bulk-rock geochemistry, and spinel mineral chemistry for ultramafic portions of the Baltimore Mafic Complex, which refers to a series of ultramafic-mafic bodies that are discontinuously exposed in Maryland and southern Pennsylvania (USA). Our data indicate that the Baltimore Mafic Complex comprises SSZ ophiolite fragments. The Soldiers Delight Ultramafite displays geochemical characteristics—including highly depleted bulk-rock trace element patterns and high Cr# of spinel—characteristic of subduction-related mantle peridotites and serpentinites. The Hollofield Ultramafite likely represents the “layered ultramafics” that form the Moho. Interpretation of the Baltimore Mafic Complex as an Iapetus Ocean–derived SSZ ophiolite in the central Appalachian orogen raises the possibility that a broadly coeval suite of ophiolites is preserved along thousands of kilometers of orogenic strike.

3 April 2020 in Journal of the Geological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGeorge Guice
George Guice
IMIain McDonald
Iain McDonald
HHHannah Hughes
Hannah Hughes
JMJohn MacDonald
John MacDonald
JFJohn Faithfull
John Faithfull
The geodynamic regime(s) that predominated during the Archean remains controversial, with the plethora of competing models largely informed by the felsic lithologies. Ultramafic–mafic rocks displaying distinctive geochemical signatures are formed in a range of Phanerozoic geotectonic environments. These rocks have high melting points, making them potentially useful tools for investigating Archean geodynamic processes in highly metamorphosed regions. We present the results of field mapping, petrography, traditional bulk-rock geochemistry and platinum group element geochemistry for 12 ultramafic–mafic bodies in the Lewisian Gneiss Complex, which is a highly metamorphosed fragment of the North Atlantic Craton in NW Scotland. Our data indicate that most of these occurrences are layered intrusions emplaced into the tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite-dominated crust prior to polyphase metamorphism, representing a significant re-evaluation of the magmatic evolution of the Lewisian Gneiss Complex. Of the other occurrences, two remain ambiguous, but one (Loch an Daimh Mor) has some geochemical affinity with abyssal/orogenic peridotites and may represent a fragment of Archean mantle, although further investigation is required. The ultramafic–mafic bodies in the Lewisian Gneiss Complex thus represent more than one type of event/process. Compared with the tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite host rocks, these lithologies may preserve evidence of protolith origin(s), with potential to illuminate the tectonic setting(s) and geodynamic regimes of the early Earth. Supplementary material: Bulk rock geochemical data is available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4878588