Nasopharyngeal swab specimen (NPS) molecular testing is considered the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection. However, saliva is an attractive, noninvasive specimen alternative. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Advanta Dx SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR saliva-based assay against paired NPS tested with either NeumoDx^TM SARS-CoV-2 assay or Abbott Real Time SARS-CoV-2 assay as the reference method. We prospectively evaluated the method in two settings: a diagnostic outpatient and a healthcare worker screening convenience sample, collected in November–December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 27.7% (61/220) of diagnostic samples and in 5% (10/200) of screening samples. Overall, saliva test in diagnostic samples had a sensitivity of 88.5% (77.8–95.3%) and specificity of 98.1% (94.6–99.6%); in screening samples, the sensitivity was 90% (55.5–99.7%) and specificity 100% (98.1–100%). Our data suggests that the Fluidigm Advanta Dx RT-PCR saliva-based assay may be a reliable diagnostic tool for COVID-19 diagnosis in symptomatic individuals and screening asymptomatic healthcare workers.

Health care workers are at increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection due to different exposures in the community and in hospital settings. Interventions implemented to avoid nosocomial outbreaks include preventive testing strategies. In this report, we present results from the mass screening program applied in our hospital to all professionals, irrespective of symptoms or risk of exposure. We processed saliva specimens with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The total number of samples received was 43,726. Positive results were 672 and average positivity rate was 1.21%. The average positivity rate was similar to the positivity rate in the community in Greece and EU. More specifically, 80.5% of the positive participants care for patients in their daily activities, 31% experienced no symptoms before receiving the positive result, 46.1% reported a close contact with a patient or infected coworkers and 32.8% reported a close contact with infected family members. We believe that the identification of asymptomatic carriers has proved the effectiveness of the screening program by preventing the putative nosocomial spread of the virus and the depletion of workforce. In conclusion, in times of high incidence in the community, the periodic testing of health care personnel is wise and relevant for implementation costs.

Background and Objectives: Thrombophilia is a prothrombotic disorder that increases the risk of blood clotting and can pose serious health problems. It is considered a condition of gene–gene or gene–environment interactions. Variation in the prevalence of thrombophilia mutations and their interaction among populations necessitates localized genetic assessments. However, population-based genetic data remains limited for developing effective preventive strategies. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted over five years (2020–2024) at a tertiary university hospital in Northern Greece. A total of 2961 individuals aged 18–85 years (mean: 50.5) were registered based on family or medical history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or clinical symptoms of VTE. The final analysis included 2078 participants comprising 1143 males (55%) and 935 females (45%), who met all the inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were absence of acute illness or malignancy, informed consent, and an adequate DNA quantity for genotyping, whereas excluded criteria included incomplete laboratory data, active inflammatory or malignant disease, and cognitive or psychiatric conditions. Peripheral blood samples were collected in 2 mL K₃-EDTA tubes, and genomic DNA was analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with melting curve analysis and hybridization probes (LightMix^® in vitro diagnostics, TIB MolBiol, Berlin, Germany). Five thrombophilia-related polymorphisms, Factor V Leiden (F5 G1691A), prothrombin (F2 G20210A), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR C677T and MTHFR A1298C), and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G, were examined for allele and genotype frequencies, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium testing, pairwise linkage disequilibrium (D′ and r²), and power analysis. For subjects tested for Factor V Leiden (n = 1476), the activated protein C resistance (APC) ratio was additionally evaluated using the ACL TOP 750 analyzer. Results: Allele frequencies were 7.3% for FV Leiden and 3.7% for FII. The PAI-1 allele was distributed at 44%, while the MTHFR (C677T and A1298C) alleles were each present at 33%. Significant linkage disequilibrium was identified between MTHFR (C677T and A1298C) and between MTHFR A1298C and PAI-1. No evolutionary pressure or demographic bias was found in the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The APC ratio demonstrated a high sensitivity (99.2%) and specificity (96.6%), indicating that it may serve as a reliable screening method. Conclusions: Our findings highlight informative patterns in the genetic predisposition to thrombophilia, which may help develop rule-based strategies for implementing thromboprophylaxis guidelines and personalized medical interventions.