In response to the imperative to mitigate methane—one of the most potent greenhouse gases—this study proposes and tests an integrated workflow for designing methane drainage boreholes targeting post-mining areas in an active underground coal mine (Pniówek, Poland). The workflow combines the following: (1) forecasting methane emissions from goafs and active longwalls for 2024–2040; (2) 3D geological characterization (structural and lithofacies models); (3) selection and sealing of goaf zones; and (4) optimization of well placement, drilling, and performance evaluation of drainage boreholes, including an assessment of energy use from the recovered gas. Applying the method delineated priority capture zones and estimated recoverable rates under multiple scenarios. Preliminary field data from a borehole near seam 362/1 indicate stable methane inflow to the drainage system and a concomitant reduction in methane load within the ventilation network. The integrated design improves targeting efficiency and provides a quantitative basis for scheduling, risk management, and sizing of surface-to-underground infrastructure. The results suggest that systematic drainage of post-mining voids can enhance safety, limit fugitive emissions, and create opportunities for on-site power generation. The approach is transferable to other active mines with legacy workings, provided site-specific calibration and monitoring are implemented.
Methane emissions from underground coal mines are a significant source of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and a major safety concern. In highly methane-prone operations, a large proportion of emissions comes from low-content abandoned mine methane (LCAMM) accumulated in post-mining goafs, where concentrations usually stay below 30% CH4. Building on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (RFCS) REM project, this paper presents a cost–benefit analysis of a comprehensive scheme for capturing, transporting, and utilising LCAMM from post-mining goafs for electricity generation. The concept involves long-reach directional boreholes drilled behind isolation dams, a dedicated methane-reduced drainage system connected to a surface methane drainage station, and four 2 MWe gas engines designed to run on a 20–40% CH4 mixture. Greenhouse gas performance is evaluated by comparing a “business-as-usual” scenario in which post-mining methane is combusted in gas engines to produce electricity without further GHG cost–benefit consideration. The results indicate that the project can achieve a positive net present value, highlighting the role of LCAMM utilisation for methane-intensive coal mines. The paper also explores the monetisation of non-emitted methane using the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), as well as social cost benchmarks and penalty levels consistent with the emerging EU Methane Emissions Regulation (EU MER).