The history of protein kinase CK2 is crowded with paradoxes and unanticipated findings. Named after a protein (casein) that is not among its physiological substrates, CK2 remained in search of its targets for more than two decades after its discovery in 1954, but it later came to be one of the most pleiotropic protein kinases. Being active in the absence of phosphorylation and/or specific stimuli, it looks unsuitable to participate in signaling cascades, but its “lateral” implication in a variety of signaling pathways is now soundly documented. At variance with many “onco-kinases”, CK2 is constitutively active, and no oncogenic CK2 mutant is known; still high CK2 activity correlates to neoplasia. Its pleiotropy and essential role may cast doubts on the actual “druggability” of CK2; however, a CK2 inhibitor is now in Phase II clinical trials for the treatment of cancer, and cell clones viable in the absence of CK2 are providing information about the mechanism by which cancer becomes addicted to high CK2 levels. A phosphoproteomics analysis of these CK2 null cells suggests that CK2 pleiotropy may be less pronounced than expected and supports the idea that the phosphoproteome generated by this kinase is flexible and not rigidly pre-determined.

CK2 is a constitutively active protein kinase that assuring a constant level of phosphorylation to its numerous substrates supports many of the most important biological functions. Nevertheless, its activity has to be controlled and adjusted in order to cope with the varying needs of a cell, and several examples of a fine-tune regulation of its activity have been described. More importantly, aberrant regulation of this enzyme may have pathological consequences, e.g. in cancer, chronic inflammation, neurodegeneration, and viral infection. Our review aims at summarizing our current knowledge about CK2 regulation. In the first part, we have considered the most important stimuli shown to affect protein kinase CK2 activity/expression. In the second part, we focus on the molecular mechanisms by which CK2 can be regulated, discussing controversial aspects and future perspectives.

Protein kinase CK1 denotes a family of pleiotropic serine/threonine protein kinases implicated in a variety of cellular functions. Typically, CK1 acts as a ‘phosphate-directed’ kinase whose targeting is primed by a single phosphorylated side chain at position n−3 or n−4 relative to serine/threonine, but increasing evidence is accumulating that CK1 can also engage some of its substrates at sites that do not conform to this canonical consensus. In the present paper, we show that CK1α phosphorylates with the same efficiency phosphopeptides primed by a phosphoserine residue at either n−3 [pS(−3)] or n−4 [pS(−4)] positions. The phosphorylation efficiency of the pS(−4) peptide, and to a lesser extent that of the pS(−3) peptide, is impaired by the triple mutation of the lysine residues in the K²²⁹KQK²³² stretch to alanine residues, promoting 40-fold and 6-fold increases of K_m respectively. In both cases, the individual mutation of Lys²³² is as detrimental as the triple mutation. A kinetic alanine-scan analysis with a series of substituted peptide substrates in which the priming phosphoserine residue was effectively replaced by a cluster of four aspartate residues was also consistent with a crucial role of Lys²³² in the recognition of the acidic determinant at position n−4. In sharp contrast, the phosphorylation of β-catenin and of a peptide including the non-canonical β-catenin site (Ser⁴⁵) lacking acidic/phosphorylated determinants upstream is not significantly affected by mutations in the KKQK stretch. These data provide a molecular insight into the structural features that underlie the site specificity of CK1α and disclose the possibility of developing strategies for the preferential targeting of subsets of CK1 substrates.

Protein kinase CK2 (formerly known as casein kinase 2 or II), a ubiquitous and constitutively active enzyme, is widely recognized as one of the most pleiotropic serine/threonine kinases. It plays a critical role in numerous signaling pathways, with hundreds of bona fide substrates. However, despite considerable research efforts, our understanding of the entire CK2 substratome and its functional associations with the majority of these substrates is far from being completely deciphered. In this context, we aim to provide an overview of how CK2 recognizes its substrates. We will discuss the pros and cons of the existing methods to manipulate CK2 activity in cells, as well as exploring the dynamic response of substrate phosphorylation to CK2 modulation.