Simon J. Cook

Simon J. Cook


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2015 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCChristopher J. Caunt
Christopher J. Caunt
MSMatthew J. Sale
Matthew J. Sale
PSPaul D. Smith
Paul D. Smith
SCSimon J. Cook
Simon J. Cook

10 October 2008 in Cell Death & Differentiation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBK Balmanno
K Balmanno
SCSimon J. Cook
Simon J. Cook

1 September 2013 in Cell Stem Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GFGabriella Ficz
Gabriella Ficz
THTimothy A. Hore
Timothy A. Hore
FSFátima Santos
Fátima Santos
HLHeather Lee
Heather Lee
WDWendy Dean
Wendy Dean
WRWolf Reik
Wolf Reik
Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation takes place in primordial germ cells (PGCs) and early embryos and is linked with pluripotency. Inhibition of Erk1/2 and Gsk3β signaling in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) by small-molecule inhibitors (called 2i) has recently been shown to induce hypomethylation. We show by whole-genome bisulphite sequencing that 2i induces rapid and genome-wide demethylation on a scale and pattern similar to that in migratory PGCs and early embryos. Major satellites, intracisternal A particles (IAPs), and imprinted genes remain relatively resistant to erasure. Demethylation involves oxidation of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), impaired maintenance of 5mC and 5hmC, and repression of the de novo methyltransferases (Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b) and Dnmt3L. We identify a Prdm14- and Nanog-binding cis-acting regulatory region in Dnmt3b that is highly responsive to signaling. These insights provide a framework for understanding how signaling pathways regulate reprogramming to an epigenetic ground state of pluripotency.

1 October 2014 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NDNicola J. Darling
Nicola J. Darling
SCSimon J. Cook
Simon J. Cook

10 June 2005 in Cell Death & Differentiation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RLR Ley
R Ley
KEK E Ewings
K E Ewings
KHK Hadfield
K Hadfield
SCSimon J. Cook
Simon J. Cook

29 March 2011 in Science Signaling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAnnette S. Little
Annette S. Little
KBKathryn Balmanno
Kathryn Balmanno
MSMatthew J. Sale
Matthew J. Sale
SNScott Newman
Scott Newman
JDJonathan R. Dry
Jonathan R. Dry
SCSimon J. Cook
Simon J. Cook
The acquisition of resistance to protein kinase inhibitors is a growing problem in cancer treatment. We modeled acquired resistance to the MEK1/2 (mitogen-activated or extracellular signal–regulated protein kinase kinases 1 and 2) inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) in colorectal cancer cell lines harboring mutations in BRAF (COLO205 and HT29 lines) or KRAS (HCT116 and LoVo lines). AZD6244-resistant derivatives were refractory to AZD6244-induced cell cycle arrest and death and exhibited a marked increase in ERK1/2 (extracellular signal–regulated kinases 1 and 2) pathway signaling and cyclin D1 abundance when assessed in the absence of inhibitor. Genomic sequencing revealed no acquired mutations in MEK1 or MEK2, the primary target of AZD6244. Rather, resistant lines showed a marked up-regulation of their respective driving oncogenes, BRAF600E or KRAS13D, due to intrachromosomal amplification. Inhibition of BRAF reversed resistance to AZD6244 in COLO205 cells, which suggested that combined inhibition of MEK1/2 and BRAF may reduce the likelihood of acquired resistance in tumors with BRAF600E. Knockdown of KRAS reversed AZD6244 resistance in HCT116 cells as well as reduced the activation of ERK1/2 and protein kinase B; however, the combined inhibition of ERK1/2 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling had little effect on AZD6244 resistance, suggesting that additional KRAS effector pathways contribute to this process. Microarray analysis identified increased expression of an 18-gene signature previously identified as reflecting MEK1/2 pathway output in resistant cells. Thus, amplification of the driving oncogene (BRAF600E or KRAS13D) can drive acquired resistance to MEK1/2 inhibitors by increasing signaling through the ERK1/2 pathway. However, up-regulation of KRAS13D leads to activation of multiple KRAS effector pathways, underlining the therapeutic challenge posed by KRAS mutations. These results may have implications for the use of combination therapies.