Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare histiocytosis that was recently recognized as a neoplastic disorder owing to the discovery of recurrent activating MAPK (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK) pathway mutations. Typical findings of ECD include central diabetes insipidus, restrictive pericarditis, perinephric fibrosis, and sclerotic bone lesions. The histopathologic diagnosis of ECD is often challenging due to nonspecific inflammatory and fibrotic findings on histopathologic review of tissue specimens. Additionally, the association of ECD with unusual tissue tropism and an insidious onset often results in diagnostic errors and delays. Most patients with ECD require treatment, except for a minority of patients with minimally symptomatic single-organ disease. The first ECD consensus guidelines were published in 2014 on behalf of the physicians and researchers within the Erdheim-Chester Disease Global Alliance. With the recent molecular discoveries and the approval of the first targeted therapy (vemurafenib) for BRAF-V600–mutant ECD, there is a need for updated clinical practice guidelines to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. This document presents consensus recommendations that resulted from the International Medical Symposia on ECD in 2017 and 2019. Herein, we include the guidelines for the clinical, laboratory, histologic, and radiographic evaluation of ECD patients along with treatment recommendations based on our clinical experience and review of literature in the molecular era.

Key Points: ECD varies in terms of age of onset, clinical presentation, manifestations, organ involvement, disease severity, and survival. ECD is a neoplasm and should be adopted by the field of hematology-oncology following the World Health Organization reclassification.

Limited information is available regarding interstitial lung disease (ILD) in Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD), a rare multisystemic non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Sixty-two biopsy-confirmed ECD patients were divided into those with no ILD (19.5%), minimal ILD (32%), mild ILD (29%), and moderate/severe ILD (19.5%), based on computed tomography (CT) findings. Dyspnea affected at least half of the patients with mild or moderate/severe ILD. Diffusion capacity was significantly reduced in ECD patients with minimal ILD. Disease severity was inversely correlated with pulmonary function measurements; no correlation with BRAF V600E mutation status was seen. Reticulations and ground-glass opacities were the predominant findings on CT images. Automated CT scores were significantly higher in patients with moderate/severe ILD, compared to those in other groups. Immunostaining of lung biopsies was consistent with ECD. Histopathology findings included subpleural and septal fibrosis, with areas of interspersed normal lung, diffuse interstitial fibrosis, histiocytes with foamy cytoplasm embedded in fibrosis, lymphoid aggregates, and focal type II alveolar cell hyperplasia. In conclusion, ILD of varying severity may affect a high proportion of ECD patients. Histopathology features of ILD in ECD can mimic interstitial fibrosis patterns observed in idiopathic ILD.

Medical genetics and genomic medicine in the Dominican Republic: challenges and opportunities.

Purpose: We examined abnormal pituitary imaging (API) and associated endocrine dysfunction in subjects with ECD. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive examination of a natural history cohort study diagnosed with ECD was conducted at a clinical research center. Subjects underwent baseline endocrine tests of anterior and posterior pituitary function and dedicated pituitary gland MRI scans. We determined the frequency of various pituitary imaging abnormalities in ECD and assessed its relationships with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), BRAF V600E status, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), pituitary hormone deficits and number, diabetes insipidus (DI), and panhypopituitarism. Results: Our cohort included 61 subjects with ECD [age (SD): 54.3 (10.9) y, 46 males/15 females]. API was present in 47.5% (29/61) of ECD subjects. Loss of the posterior pituitary bright spot (36.1%) followed by thickened pituitary stalk (24.6%), abnormal enhancement (18.0%), and pituitary atrophy (14.8%) were the most common abnormalities. DI and panhypopituitarism were more frequent in subjects with API without differences in age, sex distribution, hsCRP, ESR, and BRAF V600E status compared to normal pituitary imaging. Conclusions: We noted a high burden of API and endocrinopathies in ECD. API was highly associated with the presence of panhypopituitarism and DI. Therefore, a thorough assessment of hypothalamic–pituitary integrity should be considered in subjects with ECD.