Surgical treatments for heart failure patients are being increasingly performed every year. While experiences in this field are increasing, transition to alternative surgical approaches to minimize incisions is gaining popularity. However, there are clinics that still avoid performing these techniques. In the current study, we aim to present our experiences in transitioning to a minimally invasive technique by comparing two groups. One group was operated with a minimally invasive technique that has been performed in the learning curve period, while the second was operated with a familiar and standard technique. One hundred twenty patients who were implanted with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) from April 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The first 30 LVAD-implanted patients via less invasive approach (since April 2017) were included in group 1, and the last 30 isolated LVAD implanted patients via standard full sternotomy were included in group 2. Early clinical outcomes were compared between these two groups. There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of demographic features and preoperative statuses. Group 1 had significantly lesser mortality rates, cardiopulmonary bypass times, drainages, and blood products. Hospital stays had no significant difference between the groups, while extubation times and ICU stays were significantly lesser in group 1. Left ventricular assist device implantation through thoracotomy and ministernotomy is as feasible as that done through the conventional full sternotomy technique. In this group of patients with a high risk of bleeding, besides providing less hemorrhage, we believe that the surgical procedure was not more difficult than the conventional method.
Background: The emergence of COVID-19 has amplified the importance of efficient patient transfer, leading to the idea of inter-hospital ECMO transport programs. However, there are limited studies on ECMO transfer protocols and experiences during COVID pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness our transport program and provide insights into establishing and maintaining ECMO programs. Methods: Over the period from April 2020 to December 2021, 76 patients with severe hypoxic COVID-19 ARDS were transferred to our center under a veno-venous ECMO support. The transfers were performed by the experienced transport ECMO-team, covering both intracity and intercity transports from various hospitals in Istanbul and the Marmara Region. Results: Mean age was 44 (34–54) years. Time until ECMO initiation was 6 (3–11.2) days. The average transport distance was 36.6 ± 58.7 km. Average intracity and intercity transport distance were 17.5 ± 15.7 and 121 ± 96.6 km, respectively. ECMO wean rate was 40.7% and survival to discharge (home) was 38.1%. No major adverse events occurred during the transfer process. In one transport, the oxygen tank was instantly replenished on the road due to the decrease in the oxygen level in the tank. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study contributed to the knowledge surrounding ECMO transport programs during pandemics, emphasized the importance of expert coordination and careful patient management with demonstrating feasibility of mobile ECMO program .
1 January 2024 in Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Background: In this study, we present our experience in treating patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome using a combined anticoagulant and antiaggregant treatment with intravenous infusion of bivalirudin and aspirin. Methods: Between April 1 st , 2020 and January 31 st , 2022, a total of 52 adult patients (32 males, 20 females; mean age: 44.5±11.5 years; range, 21 to 71 years) who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation due to COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome and whose anticoagulant treatment consisted of bivalirudin plus aspirin were retrospectively analyzed. During the first 10 days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, bivalirudin dosing, activated partial thromboplastin time, and activated clotting time, as well as major bleeding events and patient and/or ECMO-circuit thromboses were recorded. Results: The mean bivalirudin dose per day ranged from 0.03 to 0.04 mg/kg/h, with a mean overall dose of 0.036 mg/kg/h. The mean activated partial thromboplastin time was 49.1±6.9 sec throughout 10 days of the application. The percentage of time in the target range for activated partial thromboplastin time was 58.9±20.1% within 10 days of application, compared to 33.1±31.1% for the first 24 h. The mean daily activated clotting time was below the target range within the first three days, but it was consistently within the target range after Day 3. During the first 10 days of the application, no mortality occurred. Major bleeding occurred in 11 patients (21.1%) and circuit thrombosis occurred in three patients (5.8%). Conclusion: In patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, an hourly bivalirudin dose of 0.03 to 0.04 mg/kg/h throughout the first 10 days of application was associated with the targeted anticoagulation profile of 45 to 60 sec. The combination was associated with a comparable rate of major bleeding, but a lower rate of circuit-thrombosis compared to the literature reports.
Background Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, causes endothelial dysfunction which is an important risk factor for mortality in adult cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to investigate whether there was a relationship between the aortic cross‐clamping (ACC) time and serum ADMA level in aortic coarctation surgery and importance of the serum ADMA level as a marker of mortality and morbidity. Method Twenty‐two patients undergoing surgery for aortic coarctation in the neonatal and early infant period were included in the study, and the patients were divided into two groups according to the aortic cross‐clamping time (Group I: 20‐min). Results In Group I, preoperative and postoperative mean ADMA values of the patients were 0.57 ± 0.78 and 0.54 ± 0.83 µmol/L, respectively. In Group II, preoperative and postoperative mean ADMA values of the patients were 0.69 ± 0.93 and 1.10 ± 0.30 µmol/L, respectively. Preoperative‐postoperative change of ADMA correlates with ACC time (r = .802, p < .005) and duration of postoperative inotropic support (r = .719, p < .05). Also a high correlation has been found between the ACC time and duration of inotropic support in both groups (r = .689, p < .05). Conclusion Perioperative serum ADMA levels could be used as a prognostic bio‐marker in the patients undergoing aortic coarctation repair. Treatments to reduce serum ADMA levels can be valuable for preventing mortality and morbidity which develop after surgeries in a transient ischemia setting by clamping the aorta.
30 December 2022 in Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi
This study aimed to search risk factors for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following mitral valve and aortic valve replacements with/without tricuspid annuloplasty (TAP). This study retrospectively analysed patients undergoing aortic valve and mitral valve replacements with/without concomitant TAP from January 2014 to December 2017. A total 179 consecutive patients were included into the study, 165 (92.17%) patients comprised no-PPI group and 14 (7.82%) comprised PPI group. A total 179 consecutive patients were 48.0% men; with the mean age 51.7±13.7 years. The two groups did not differ with respect to age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), ejection fraction % (EF %) and the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (p>0.05). The PPI group had smaller sizes of mechanical or biological aortic valves (p˂0.05), with a significantly higher rate of baseline atrial fibrillation (AF) (p˂0.05). The late mortality rates were 10.9%, 35.7% in the no-PPI and the PPI groups, respectively (p 2+ postoperative TR (p2+ postoperative TR among patients receiving PPIs can be deemed merely a result, but not a risk factor.