Background/Objectives: Primary spinal sarcomas, encompassing both bone and soft tissue histotypes, demand individualized reconstruction due to heterogeneous tumor biology, anatomic complexity, and host environments compromised by radiation, systemic therapy, or prior surgery. This narrative review reframes post-resection spinal reconstruction through a precision-medicine lens. Methods: A structured literature review was performed using PubMed and Scopus, targeting articles published between 2000 and 2026. Searches encompassed spinal sarcoma reconstruction, radiation and fusion, biologic reconstruction, and emerging technologies. Results: Tumor grade, radiation exposure, and systemic therapy timing emerge as multiplicative determinants of reconstructive environment quality, with drug-class-specific perioperative effects warranting stratified management. Vascularized bone grafts achieve reliable fusion in compromised hosts where avascular constructs fail. A precision-oriented reconstructive ladder is proposed as a conceptual, hypothesis-generating framework to guide strategy selection. Hybrid PSI-VBG constructs may further expand reconstructive possibilities. The evidence base remains largely composed of small, retrospective series. Conclusions: Individualized strategies anchored in tumor biology and host environment are the cornerstone of durable spinal sarcoma reconstructions. The proposed framework requires prospective, multi-institutional validation. Standardized outcome definitions, prospective registries, and histotype-stratified analyses are needed to advance the field.

Spinal sarcomas are rare, aggressive tumors requiring wide resection that creates large, challenging defects. Conventional reconstruction using allografts or metallic implants is prone to failure in compromised settings like irradiated or infected tissue. This narrative review synthesizes the literature on biologic reconstruction strategies, focusing on vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) and the ‘spinoplastic’ reconstruction approach, to provide a clinical framework for their application. We performed a narrative literature review using PubMed and Scopus to synthesize clinical studies describing biologic spinal reconstruction in compromised host beds. The main findings show that pedicled VBGs (e.g., rib, iliac crest) and free VBGs (e.g., fibula) function as living structural components. ‘Spinoplastic’ reconstruction leverages these grafts to promote biologic fusion, with clinical series reporting high union rates, even in irradiated or revision settings, offering a durable alternative to avascular constructs. Biologic reconstruction using VBGs is a critical strategy for achieving durable spinal stability in these challenging scenarios, and future directions point toward hybrid strategies combining 3D-printed implants with the biologic power of VBGs.