The question of professional trust urgently needs closer attention in relation to teacher recruitment and retention, as this research shows it has significant bearing on the symbolic capital that may help to attract, motivate, and sustain high quality teachers. In Australian schools, teachers are frequently subject to initiatives to improve their practice, address their perceived limitations, and hold them accountable for failing students, schools, or systems. We argue that teachers, in the advent of these reforms intended to improve them, come to believe they are distrusted in their professional roles. Denying teachers the sense of themselves as capable professionals risks contributing to the problems of retention that are becoming ever more urgent in the Australian context and elsewhere in the world. This article explores the impacts of discourses and policy directions on teachers’ perceptions of professional trust. Drawing on case study data from two schools in the state of Victoria, Australia, we highlight the ways discourses of professional distrust emerge through policy directives that position teachers as ‘the problem’ in education.

Differentiated instruction has been shown to meet the needs of diverse learners, and can meaningfully improve individual student learning, however many teachers find it challenging to implement. This paper reports on a targeted professional development programme which was undertaken as a collaborative action research project. Results show many participants adapted their classroom pedagogy to provide further supports for students through differentiated instruction. We argue that this study’s use of a collaborative action research approach to provide teacher professional development, along with a focus on evidence using a differentiation observation instrument, were important stimuli for reflection and pedagogical experimentation. This targeted approach to professional reflection and exposure to research-based and other colleagues’ teaching practices led to enhanced differentiated instruction among participants. These findings contribute to understanding the processes that lead to teacher development.

The Immigration Museum in Melbourne, Australia illustrates the increasing attention to working for social change and cultural recognition in museums throughout the world; its exhibitions are structured to move visitors towards understanding of and positive regard for cultural difference. There are, however, two distinct ‘phases’ or approaches to working towards what Fraser describes as recognitive justice in the Museum. Early exhibitions emphasised narratives of individual experience, humanising migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers through a sense of ‘connection’, while the most recent permanent exhibition, Identity: Yours, Mine, Ours, confronts visitors with a much more openly anti-racist stance. This paper argues that this recent exhibition represents a shift to a more unapologetically ‘activist’ role for the Immigration Museum, which has implications for the kind of cultural recognition sought.

This chapter examines two recently developed Australian museum exhibitions and their role in inducting visitors into affective practices of war commemoration and remembering; it draws on analysis of each of the exhibitions examined as well as interviews with key curatorial and education staff at the two institutions. To develop this argument, it discusses the museum through the theoretical lens of the heterotopia. The chapter argues that representations of war history offer valuable insights into the ways exhibitions work with emotion and affect to teach visitors particular ways of engaging with and understanding the past, and that different approaches speak to the political and social purposes for museum learning. Museum Victoria is an institution viewed within and without as having a 'social conscience'; interviews with curators and educators reflected their keen awareness of the potential of their museums to contribute to social justice and inclusion in the state of Victoria.

Purpose: The archives gathered in this collection engage in the current COVID-19 moment. They do so in order to attempt to understand it, to think and feel with others and to create a collectivity that, beyond the slogan “we are in this together”, seriously contemplates the implications of what it means to be given an opportunity to alter the course of history, to begin to learn to live and educate otherwise.Design/methodology/approach: This paper is collectively written by twelve academics in March 2020, a few weeks into the first closing down of common spaces in 2020, Victoria, Australia. Writing through and against “social isolation”, the twelve quarantine archives in this paper are all at once questions, methods, data, analysis, implications and limitations of these pandemic times and their afterlives.Findings: These quarantine archives reveal a profound sense of dislocation, relatability and concern. Several of the findings in this piece succeed at failing to explain in generalising terms these un-new upending times and, in the process, raise more questions and propose un-named methodologies.Originality/value: If there is anything this paper could claim as original, it would be its present ability to respond to the current times as a historical moment of intensity. At times when “isolation”, “self” and “contained” are the common terms of reference, the “collective”, “connected” and “socially engaged” nature of this paper defies those very terms. Finally, the socially transformative desire archived in each of the pieces is a form of future history-making that resists the straight order with which history is often written and made.

Clinical models inform initial teacher education programs at several sites globally. Such models, and the term ‘clinical,’ along with related but not synonymous evidence-based forms of teaching, are advocated by some and criticised by others. Advocates emphasise an integration of evidence, theory, and research with contextualised clinical judgement that centres on students and teachers. Critics raise concerns over the privileging of ‘scientific’ or ‘medicalised’ ways of knowing that undermine teachers’ professional and moral judgement. This paper draws on focus group data exploring understandings of clinical judgement among 20 teacher educators in a well-established clinical teacher education course. Findings reveal that while there were tensions in the use of ‘clinical’, participants saw value in the language of clinical judgement in teaching. Clinical judgement positioned teaching as a profoundly intellectual activity in which the synthesis and evaluation of observations, research, context, and student learning evidence informed teacher decision making. Findings suggest that, when framed in this way, clinical judgement and clinical teaching models can enhance teachers’ professionalism and confidence in professional decisions. The perspectives of participants reveal an often-overlooked aspect of the clinical teaching debate—the experiences of teacher educators working within such a model.