Rationale: Subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) appears to be effective in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), primarily by reducing early-onset pneumonia; but it may not prevent late-onset pneumonia. We tested the hypothesis using an endotracheal tube incorporating an ultrathin polyurethane cuff (which reduces channel formation and fluid leakage from the subglottic area), in addition to an SSD lumen, which would reduce the incidence of late-onset VAP. Objectives: To compare the incidence of VAP, using an endotracheal tube with polyurethane cuff and subglottic secretion drainage (ETT-PUC-SSD) versus a conventional endotracheal tube (ETT-C) with polyvinyl cuff, without subglottic secretion drainage. Methods: Clinical randomized trial in a 24-bed medical–surgical intensive care unit. Patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one was ventilated with ETT-PUC-SSD and the other with ETT-C. Measurements and Main Results: Tracheal aspirate samples were obtained during endotracheal intubation, then twice per week and finally on extubation. VAP was found in 31 of 140 (22.1%) patients in the ETT-C group and in 11 of 140 (7.9%) in the ETT-PUC-SSD group (P = 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed ETT-C as a risk factor for global VAP (hazard ratio [HR], 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66–6.67; P = 0.001), early-onset VAP (HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.19–9.09; P = 0.02), and late-onset VAP (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.34–9.01; P = 0.01). Conclusions: The use of an endotracheal tube with polyurethane cuff and subglottic secretion drainage helps prevent early- and late-onset VAP. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00475579).

The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) using a closed-tracheal suction system vs. an open system. Prospective and randomized study, from October 1, 2002, to December 31, 2003. A 24-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit in a 650-bed tertiary hospital. Patients requiring mechanical ventilation for >24 hrs. Patients were randomized into two groups; one group was suctioned with the closed-tracheal suctioning system and another group with the open system. Throat swabs were taken at admission and twice a week until discharge to classify pneumonia in endogenous and exogenous. A total of 443 patients (210 with closed-tracheal suction system and 233 with the open system) were included. There were no significant differences between groups of patients in age, sex, diagnosis groups, mortality, number of aspirations per day, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. No significant differences were found in either the percentage of patients who developed VAP (20.47% vs. 18.02%) or in the number of VAP cases per 1000 mechanical ventilation-days (17.59 vs. 15.84). There were also no differences in the VAP incidence by mechanical ventilation duration. At the same time, we did not find any differences in the incidence of exogenous VAP. Likewise, there were also no differences in the microorganisms responsible for pneumonia. Patient cost per day for the closed suction was more expensive than the open suction system (11.11 US dollars +/- 2.25 US dollars vs. 2.50 US dollars +/- 1.12 US dollars, p < .001). We conclude that in our study, the closed-tracheal suction system did not reduce VAP incidence, even for exogenous pneumonia.

Introduction: The use of a system for continuous control of endotracheal tube cuff pressure reduced the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in one randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 112 patients but not in another RCT with 142 patients. In several guidelines on the prevention of VAP, the use of a system for continuous or intermittent control of endotracheal cuff pressure is not reviewed. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of VAP in a large sample of patients (n = 284) treated with either continuous or intermittent control of endotracheal tube cuff pressure. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation during more than 48 hours in an intensive care unit (ICU) using either continuous or intermittent endotracheal tube cuff pressure control. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLRA) and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were used to predict VAP. The magnitude of the effect was expressed as odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR), respectively, and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: We found a lower incidence of VAP with the continuous (n = 150) than with the intermittent (n = 134) pressure control system (22.0% versus 11.2%; p = 0.02). MLRA showed that the continuous pressure control system (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.22-0.89; p = 0.02) and the use of an endotracheal tube incorporating a lumen for subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.19-0.84; p = 0.02) were protective factors against VAP. Cox regression analysis showed that the continuous pressure control system (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.24-0.84; p = 0.01) and the use of an endotracheal tube incorporating a lumen for SSD (HR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.15-0.56; p < 0.001) were protective factors against VAP. However, the interaction between type of endotracheal cuff pressure control system (continuous or intermittent) and endotracheal tube (with or without SSD) was not statistically significant in MLRA (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.07-2.37; p = 0.32) or in Cox analysis (HR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.06-1.84; p = 0.21). Conclusions: The use of a continuous endotracheal cuff pressure control system and/or an endotracheal tube with a lumen for SSD could help to prevent VAP in patients requiring more than 48 hours of mechanical ventilation.

Introduction: Some guidelines to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) do not establish a recommendation for the preferential use of either heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) or heated humidifiers (HHs), while other guidelines clearly advocate the use of HMEs. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of VAP associated with HHs or HMEs. Methods: A randomized study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a university hospital involving patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for >5 days. Patients were assigned to two groups; one group received HH and the other group received HME. Tracheal aspirate samples were obtained on endotracheal intubation, then twice a week, and finally on extubation, in order to diagnose VAP. Throat swabs were taken on admission to the intensive care unit, then twice a week, and finally at discharge from the intensive care unit in order to classify VAP as primary endogenous, secondary endogenous, or exogenous. Results: A total of 120 patients were assigned to HMEs (60 patients) and HHs (60 patients); 16 patients received mechanical ventilation for less than five days and were excluded from the analysis. Data analysis of the remaining 104 patients (53 HMEs and 51 HHs) showed no significant differences between groups regarding sex, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, pre-VAP use of antibiotics, days on mechanical ventilation, and diagnosis group. VAP was found in eight of 51 (15.69%) patients in the HH group and in 21 of 53 (39.62%) patients in the HME group (P = 0.006). The median time free of VAP was 20 days (95% confidence interval, 13.34–26.66) for the HH group and was 42 days (95% confidence interval, 35.62–48.37) for the HME group (P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed the HME as a risk factor for VAP (hazard rate, 16.2; 95% confidence interval, 4.54–58.04; P < 0.001). Conclusion: The patients mechanically ventilated for more than five days developed a lower incidence of VAP with a HH than with a HME.