Stefania  Lo Cicero Lo Cicero

Dr. Stefania Lo Cicero Lo Cicero


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 September 2023 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSabina Maria Bruno
Sabina Maria Bruno
GBGiovanna Blaconà
Giovanna Blaconà
SCStefania Lo Cicero Lo Cicero
Stefania Lo Cicero Lo Cicero
GCGermana Castelli
Germana Castelli
MVMariarita Virgulti
Mariarita Virgulti
Marco LucarelliMarco Lucarelli
Marco Lucarelli
In the precision medicine era of cystic fibrosis (CF), therapeutic interventions, by the so-called modulators, target the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The levels of targetable CFTR proteins are a main variable in the success of patient-specific therapy. In turn, the CFTR protein level depends, at least in part, on the level of CFTR mRNA. Many mechanisms can modulate the CFTR mRNA level, for example, transcriptional rate, stability of the mRNA, epigenetics, and pathogenic variants that can affect mRNA production and degradation. Independently from the causes of variable CFTR mRNA levels, their exact quantitative assessment is of great importance in CF. Methods with high analytical sensitivity, precision, and accuracy are mandatory for the quantitative evaluation aimed at the amelioration of the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic aspects. This paper compares, for the first time, two CFTR gene expression quantification methods: a well-established method for the relative quantification of CFTR mRNA using a real-time PCR and an innovative method for its absolute quantification using a droplet digital PCR. No comprehensive methods for absolute CFTR quantification via droplet digital PCR have been published so far. The accurate quantification of CFTR expression at the mRNA level is a critical step for the personalized therapeutic approaches of CF.

2 December 2025 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCStefania Lo Cicero Lo Cicero
Stefania Lo Cicero Lo Cicero
GCGermana Castelli
Germana Castelli
ACAurora Ceci
Aurora Ceci
ACAnna Maria Cerio
Anna Maria Cerio
GBGiovanna Blaconà
Giovanna Blaconà
AEAdriana Eramo
Adriana Eramo
Despite the progressive extension of CFTR variant eligibility to the triple combination of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), most rare CFTR pathogenic variants remain ineligible for CFTR modulators. It is crucial to determine whether unexplored variants are rescuable by clinical modulators and to identify innovative therapeutic strategies for rescuing non-responder variants. The approach known as “theratyping” (in vitro testing of genotypes) has been accepted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the extension of clinical modulators’ approval for in vitro responding genotypes. We used one of the most advanced models for theratyping: organoids derived from nasal epithelia of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). We optimized the forskolin-induced swelling (FIS) of organoids to assess CFTR basal or modulator-restored function. Nasal organoids mimicked the original epithelial tissue, CFTR residual activity, and modulator response. We set up the FIS assay using nasal organoids with reference genotypes and theratyped 38 rare (non-F508del) CFTR genotypes, either eligible or non-eligible for FDA approval, for treatment with ETI or ivacaftor. We found strong correspondence between the in vitro response of CFTR variants to modulators and their FDA approval status. Additionally, some previously uncharacterized CFTR variants have proven responsive to clinical modulators, with significant therapeutic implications. These results suggest that the nasal organoid FIS assay, pending confirmation of the prediction in the corresponding pwCF, might be considered as a powerful in vitro tool to predict modulator efficacy in each pwCF, guiding out-of-label prescription in CF, and to identify uncharacterized variants responsive to modulators. This approach may allow comparison of the efficacy of different therapeutics or the identification of innovative strategies for non-responding genotypes, improving personalized therapy and quality of life for pwCF.