Prostate cancer is the most common malignant disease in men. Several therapeutic agents have been approved during the last 10 years. Among them, radium-223 dichloride (Xofigo^®) is a radioactive isotope that induces irreversible DNA double-strand breaks and consequently tumor cell death. Radium-223 dichloride is a calcium-mimetic agent that specifically targets bone lesions. Radium-223 dichloride has been approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases, without known visceral metastases. In this review, first we summarize the interplay between prostate tumor cells and bone microenvironment; then, we discuss radium-223 dichloride mechanism of action and present the results of the available clinical trials and future developments for this new drug.

Purpose: This study examines the use of [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the evaluation of the therapeutic response for patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) focusing on prognostic stratification. Patients and Methods: Forty-seven patients with MBC were treated with a maximum of three cycles of HDC. Therapeutic response was assessed with conventional imaging (CImg; including a computed tomography in all cases and ultrasound, mammography, and bone scanning as clinically indicated) and by FDG-PET study performed after the last cycle of HDC. Parameters analyzed for predicting survival were FDG-PET and CImg results, pattern of disease, prior treatment, and HDC regimen. Results: Complete responses were observed in 16 patients (37%) with CImg and 34 patients (72%) with FDG-PET. The FDG-PET result was the most powerful and independent predictor of survival; patients with a negative post-treatment FDG-PET had a longer median survival than patients with a positive FDG-PET (24 months v 10 months; P < .001). By multivariate analysis the relative risk (RR) of death was higher in patients with FDG-PET-positive disease (RR, 5.3), prior anthracycline treatment (RR, 3.3), or with visceral metastasis (RR, 2.4). Conclusion: A single FDG-PET study performed after completion of HDC for MBC can powerfully stratify for survival. This may have implications for how we should assess outcome after conventional-dose therapy for MBC and warrants additional study.

Our group has developed a new radiopharmaceutical, (123)I - N-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-2-iodobenzamide ((123)I-BZA2), a benzamide derivative able to bind to melanin pigment in melanoma cells. In a prospective and multicentric phase III clinical study, the value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (123)I-BZA2 scintigraphy was compared for melanoma staging. Patients with a past history of cutaneous or ocular melanoma were included from 8 hospitals. (18)F-FDG imaging was performed according to a standard PET protocol. Whole-body, static planar, and SPECT/CT (if available) images were acquired 4 h after injection of a 2 MBq/kg dose of (123)I-BZA2. (18)F-FDG and (123)I-BZA2 sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of melanoma metastasis were calculated and compared on both a lesion basis and a patient basis. True-positive and true-negative lesion status was determined after 6 mo of clinical follow-up or according to lesion biopsies (if available). Melanin content in biopsies was evaluated with the standard Fontana-Masson silver method and was correlated with (123)I-BZA2 uptake. Based on statistical analysis, the number of inclusions was estimated at 186. In all, 87 patients were enrolled from 2008 to 2010. Of these, 45 (52%) had metastases. A total of 338 imaging abnormalities were analyzed; 86 lesions were considered metastases, and 20 of 25 lesion biopsies found melanoma metastases. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG for diagnosis of melanoma metastases was higher than that of (123)I-BZA2, at 87% and 39%, respectively (P < 0.05). For specificity, (18)F-FDG and (123)I-BZA2 were not statistically different, at 78% and 94%, respectively. In a lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG was statistically higher than that of (123)I-BZA2 (80% vs. 23%, P < 0.05). The specificity of (18)F-FDG was lower than that of (123)I-BZA2 (54% vs. 86%, P < 0.05). According to biopsy analysis, only 9 of 20 metastatic lesions (45%) were pigmented with high melanin content. (123)I-BZA2 imaging was positive for 6 of 8 melanin-positive lesions, fairly positive for 3 of 10 melanin-negative lesions, and negative for 7 of 10 melanin-negative lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of (123)I-BZA2 for the diagnosis of melanin-positive lesions were 75% and 70%, respectively. Because of a low (123)I-BZA2 sensitivity, this clinical trial was prematurely closed after 87 patients had been included. This study confirms the value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for melanoma staging and strengthens the high accuracy of (123)I-BZA2 for diagnosis of melanin-positive metastatic melanoma. Moreover, benzamide derivatives radiolabeled with therapeutic radionuclide may offer a new strategy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma patients harboring melanin-positive metastases.

As the preparation phase of a multicenter clinical trial using (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG), (18)F-fluoromisonidazole ((18)F-FMISO), and 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we investigated whether 18 nuclear medicine centers would score tracer uptake intensity similarly and define hypoxic and proliferative volumes for 1 patient and we compared different segmentation methods. Ten (18)F-FDG, ten (18)F-FMISO, and ten (18)F-FLT PET/CT examinations were performed before and during curative-intent radiotherapy in 5 patients with NSCLC. The gold standards for uptake intensity and volume delineation were defined by experts. The between-center agreement (18 nuclear medicine departments connected with a dedicated network, SFMN-net [French Society of Nuclear Medicine]) in the scoring of uptake intensity (5-level scale, then divided into 2 levels: 0, normal; 1, abnormal) was quantified by κ-coefficients (κ). The volumes defined by different physicians were compared by overlap and κ. The uptake areas were delineated with 22 different methods of segmentation, based on fixed or adaptive thresholds of standardized uptake value (SUV). For uptake intensity, the κ values between centers were, respectively, 0.59 for (18)F-FDG, 0.43 for (18)F-FMISO, and 0.44 for (18)F-FLT using the 5-level scale; the values were 0.81 for (18)F-FDG and 0.77 for both (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT using the 2-level scale. The mean overlap and mean κ between observers were 0.13 and 0.19, respectively, for (18)F-FMISO and 0.2 and 0.3, respectively, for (18)F-FLT. The segmentation methods yielded significantly different volumes for (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT (P < 0.001). In comparison with physicians, the best method found was 1.5 × maximum SUV (SUVmax) of the aorta for (18)F-FMISO and 1.3 × SUVmax of the muscle for (18)F-FLT. The methods using the SUV of 1.4 and the method using 1.5 × the SUVmax of the aorta could be used for (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT. Moreover, for (18)F-FLT, 2 other methods (adaptive threshold based on 1.5 or 1.6 × muscle SUVmax) could be used. The reproducibility of the visual analyses of (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT PET/CT images was demonstrated using a 2-level scale across 18 centers, but the interobserver agreement was low for the (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FLT volume measurements. Our data support the use of a fixed threshold (1.4) or an adaptive threshold using the aorta background to delineate the volume of increased (18)F-FMISO or (18)F-FLT uptake. With respect to the low tumor-on-background ratio of these tracers, we suggest the use of a fixed threshold (1.4).