Objectives: To analyse the effectiveness of dalbavancin (DBV) in clinical practice as consolidation therapy in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) and/or infective endocarditis (IE) produced by gram-positive cocci (GPC), as well as its safety and pharmacoeconomic impact.Methods: A multicentre, observational and retrospective study was conducted of hospitalised patients with IE and/or BSI produced by GPC who received at least one dose of DBV. Clinical response was assessed during hospitalization, at 3 months and at 1 year.Results: Eighty-three patients with median age of 73 years were enrolled; 73.5% were male; 59.04% had BSI and 49.04% IE (44.04% prosthetic valve IE, 32.4% native IE, 23.5% pacemaker lead). The most frequently isolated microorganism wasStaphylococcus aureusin BSI (49%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci in IE (44.1%). All patients with IE were clinically cured in hospital; at 12 months, there was 2.9% loss to follow-up, 8.8% mortality unrelated to IE, and 2.9% therapeutic failure rate. The percentage effectiveness of DBV to treat IE was 96.7%. The clinical cure rate for BSI was 100% during hospital stay and at 3 months; there were no recurrences or deaths during the follow-up. No patient discontinued treatment for adverse events. The saving in hospital stay was 636 days for BSI (315,424.20€) and 557 days for IE (283,187.45€).Conclusions: DBV is an effective consolidation antibiotic therapy in clinically stabilized patients with IE and/or BSI. It proved to be a cost-effective treatment, reducing the hospital stay, thanks to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of this drug.

Despite medical advances, mortality in infective endocarditis (IE) is still very high. Previous studies on prognosis in IE have observed conflicting results. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality in a large multicenter cohort of left-sided IE.

Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (AC) is a well-recognized inpatient regimen for Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (IE). In this regimen, ceftriaxone is usually administered 2 g every 2 h (AC12). The administration of AC in outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) programs is challenging because multiple daily doses are required. AC regimens useful for OPAT programs include once-daily high-dose administration of ceftriaxone (AC24) or AC co-diluted and jointly administered in bolus every 4 h (ACjoined). In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected cases, we aimed to assess the clinical effectivity and safety of three AC regimens for the treatment of E. faecalis IE. Fifty-nine patients were treated with AC combinations (AC12 n = 32, AC24 n = 17, and ACjoined n = 10). Six relapses occurred in the whole cohort: five (29.4%) treated with AC24 regimen and one (10.0%) with ACjoined. Patients were cured in 30 (93.3%), 16 (94.1%), and eight (80.0%) cases in the AC12, AC24 and ACjoined groups, respectively. Unplanned readmission occurred in eight (25.0%), six (35.3%), and two (20.0%) patients in the AC12, AC24 and ACjoined groups, respectively. The outcome of patients with E. faecalis IE treated with AC in OPAT programs relies on an optimization of the delivery of the combination. AC24 exhibit an unexpected rate of failures, however, ACjoined might be an effective alternative which clinical results should corroborate in further studies.

Introduction: Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) is a therapeutic alternative for complex infections where a cure is considered unlikely or impossible. SAT involves the prolonged, often indefinite, administration of antibiotics, typically given orally, to control symptoms. However, the increasing incidence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms limits the availability of oral options. Dalbavancin is a parenteral antibiotic with broad coverage against Gram-positive bacteria that offers the advantage of an extended dosing interval. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with implant-associated osteoarticular infections receiving dalbavancin as SAT. A secondary objective was to identify factors associated with SAT failure with dalbavancin. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicentre, observational study with retrospective recruitment of patients treated with dalbavancin as (SAT) for complex implant-associated osteoarticular infections, in which curative surgery was either not feasible or insufficient. Cohort characteristics were described, and variables associated with SAT failure under dalbavancin treatment were analysed. Results: A total of 43 patients received dalbavancin as SAT. The most frequent indication was prosthetic joint infection (38 [88.4%]). A total of 28 patients (65.1%) had chronic infections; the remaining cases were acute infections that had failed conservative management. Nine different dosing regimens of dalbavancin were used. Dalbavancin provided adequate symptomatic control in 32 patients (74.4%) over a follow-up period of 836.5 days (IQR 402–1288.5). The antibiotic was well tolerated; only one adverse effect was reported in a patient. Three patients developed resistance during treatment, which accounted for SAT failure. Conclusions: Dalbavancin is shown to be a safe and convenient alternative for SAT for orthopaedic implant infection. Although the development of resistance was infrequent, it can occur and should be monitored.