Background/Objectives: Patient care in Cardiac Intensive Care Units (CICU) has evolved but data on patient characteristics and outcomes are sparse. This retrospective observational study aimed to define clinical characteristics and risk factors of CICU patients, their in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and compare it with established risk scores. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 294, mean age 70 years, 74% males) hospitalized within 15 months were studied; APACHE II, EHMRG, GWTG-HF, and GRACE II were calculated on admission. Results: Most patients were admitted for ACS (48.3%) and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) (31.3%). Median duration of hospitalization was 2 days (IQR = 1, 4). In-hospital infection occurred in 20%, 18% needed mechanical ventilation, 10% renal replacement therapy and 4% percutaneous ventricular assist devices (33%, 29%, 20% and 4%, respectively, for ADHF). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 18% and 11% for all patients (29% and 23%, respectively, for ADHF). Established scores (especially APACHE II) had a good diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve-AUC). In univariate and multivariate analyses in-hospital intubation and infection, history of coronary artery disease, hypotension, uremia and hypoxemia on admission were the most important risk factors. Based on these, a proposed new score showed a diagnostic accuracy of 0.954 (AUC) for in-hospital mortality, outperforming previous scores. Conclusions: Patients are admitted mainly with ACS or ADHF, the latter with worse prognosis. Several patients need advanced support; intubation and infections adversely affect prognosis. Established scores predict mortality satisfactorily, but larger studies are needed to develop CICU-directed scores to identify risk factors, improve prediction, guide treatment and staff training.

Background/Objectives: Advanced heart failure (AdvHF) characterizes patients with impaired functional capacity, severe systolic or diastolic cardiac function, unplanned visits or hospitalizations, raised natriuretic peptides, and increased mortality. Methods: Ninety-five consecutive AdvHF patients followed in a tertiary academic center in Northwestern Greece (2nd Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Ioannina) were enrolled over a 30-month period. Three distinctive patterns of management were recognized and assessed: intermittent levosimendan administration to 33 patients, intermittent intravenous furosemide administration to 17 patients, and 45 patients were followed up exclusively on an outpatient basis with frequent visits. MAGGIC, SHFM, and BCN-Bio scores were assessed in all patients and mortality was also assessed. Results: Mean age was 73 (±10) years, and 38% were females, 41% had diabetes mellitus, 41% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 59% had coronary artery disease (CAD), 73% had a history of atrial fibrillation, and 82.1% had a cardiac device implanted. The median duration of follow-up was 24 months (IQ range 14, 30). The 12-month and 30-month mortality rates were 19% and 49%, respectively. Higher rates of 1-year mortality were observed in the levosimendan group (30%). The median 12-month mortality of the three scores was comparable to the actual mortality, but their prognostic value was not satisfactory (AUC < 0.540 and p > 0.05 for all), while they performed better for 30-month mortality (AUC < 0.756 and p > 0.05 for all). In the current study, mortality at 12 months was associated with decreasing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and sodium levels; the presence of CAD (p < 0.05 for all) and mortality at 30 months was associated with decreasing systolic blood pressure, as well as DBP and left ventricle ejection fraction, but also with the presence of CAD and the use of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system blockers. Logistic regression-based models incorporating these factors have a greater diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.824 and 0.817 for 12 and 30 months, respectively; p < 0.001 for both). Conclusions: AdvHF patients represent a complex population requiring close follow-up and novel strategies to improve survival. Larger studies are needed to refine and update predictive scores in this population.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous pathophysiological state with high mortality, despite the development of cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) and the advanced treatments applied. The cornerstones of therapy that have been proposed in many algorithms are intravenous (i.v.) pressors and devices for mechanical circulatory support (MCS), depending on the CS profile (left, right, or biventricular involvement), etiology (acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or other) and SCAI stage (A to E, with MCS generally recommended for Stages C–E). There are many gaps in the evidence regarding i.v. medications and devices, with the existing data being controversial. Moreover, there are differences in the devices’ availability and, as a result, a lack of experience in many centers. In this review article, an algorithm for the management of CS is proposed, and the gaps in every step are presented. Early clinical suspicion that leads to prompt diagnosis, health system organization, large-scale trials, and the configuration of national or regional shock centers could bridge the current therapeutic gaps and balance disparities in the management of CS in order to improve outcomes.