Whether joint replacement surgery can be performed safely on HIV patients is still a matter of debate. This study aimed to report the surgical efficacy and complications of joint replacement surgery in HIV patients. A total of 21 HIV patients and 27 non-HIV patients who underwent arthroplasties in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The 21 HIV patients received 29 joint replacement surgeries including 27 cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 2 cases of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The non-HIV patients received 16 THA, 10 TKA, and 3 unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA). The length of hospital stay of HIV patients was significantly lower than that of non-HIV patients. At the last follow-up, there were no significant complications both in the HIV group and the non-HIV groups. No medical staff had any occupational exposure. We concluded that joint replacement surgery in HIV patients is safe and effective. Optimization of patients is key to treatment success. Strictly following the standardized protection protocol can prevent the risk of occupational exposure.

Large language models (LLMs) offer potential in primary dental care. We conducted an evaluation of LLMs’ diagnostic capabilities across various oral diseases and contexts. All LLMs showed diagnostic capabilities for temporomandibular joint disorders, periodontal disease, dental caries, and malocclusion. The prompts did not affect the performance of ChatGPT 3.5. When Chinese was used, the diagnostic ability of ChatGPT 3.5 for pulpitis improved (0% vs. 61.7%, p < 0.001), while the ability to diagnose pericoronitis decreased (8% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). For ChatGPT 4.0 in Chinese, they were both improved (0% vs. 92%, 8% vs. 72%, p < 0.001, respectively). Claude 2 exhibited the highest accuracy in diagnosing pulpitis (36%, p = 0.048), ChatGPT 4.0 showed complete diagnostic capability for pericoronitis. Llama 2 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet exhibited complete diagnostic capability for oral cancer. In conclusion, LLMs may be a potential tool for daily dental care but need further updates.

This study aims to explore the quality of life (QOL) and pain after revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on patients’ reported outcomes. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted and 137 valid responses were included (response rate 64.0%). A total of 42 patients underwent debridement with implant retention (DAIR), 31 underwent one-stage revision, and 64 underwent two-stage revision. The average overall SF-36 score was 70.3. The DAIR group had significantly higher SF-36 than the two-stage revision group (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the one-stage revision group and the other two groups. A total of 74.5% of patients reported pain with an average McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) score of 8.6. There was no significant difference in the MPQ scores among the three groups. Simple linear regression analyses demonstrated that higher preoperative PMN%, VAS, and shorter hospital stay were associated with pain (adjusted R² = 4%, p = 0.020; adjusted R² = 2.1%, p = 0.048; adjusted R² = 2.1%, p = 0.049; respectively). We concluded that the overall QOL of patients after revision surgery for PJI is generally satisfactory. Persistent pain is prevalent, but the severity was mostly mild. Preoperative PMN%, VAS, and hospital stay were associated with postoperative pain.

Objective: The management of the infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a novel IPFP preservation technique—“the medially pedicled IPFP flap”—for reducing postoperative pain, wound complications, and improving functional recovery after TKA.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on TKA cases at our institution from 2018 to 2021, including those with IPFP preservation (medially pedicled flap) versus IPFP complete resection. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters (blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, visual analogue scale [VAS] score, white cell count [WBC], C‐reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and wound oozing), and postoperative follow‐up data (VAS, Knee Society [KSS], or Knee Society functional assessment [KSFA] scores) were compared between groups. Independent sample t‐tests were used to compare continuous data and chi‐squared tests were used to compare categorical data between groups.Results: Six hundred thirty patients were included, with 278 in the medial pedicled IPFP flap group (preservation group) and 352 in the IPFP resection group (resection group). The operative time was significantly shorter in the preservation versus resection group (125.5 ± 23.2 vs 130.3 ± 28.7 mins, p = 0.03), as was the length of hospital stay (8.4 ± 2.7 vs 9.2 ± 2.3 days, p < 0.01). Regarding pain, the preservation group had significantly lower VAS scores on postoperative day 2 (2.0 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 1.2, p < 0.001) and day 3 (1.5 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). CRP and ESR levels on postoperative day 5 were also significantly lower in the preservation group. Wound oozing rates were significantly lower in the preservation versus resection group (0.7% vs 2.8%, p = 0.04). No significant differences existed in VAS, KSS, or KSFA scores at the last follow‐up.Conclusion: The novel IPFP preservation technique significantly improved surgical exposure, shortened operative time and length of hospital stay. It also reduced wound pain and oozing compared to IPFP resection.