Gavin Wood

Dr. Gavin Wood

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2013 in Orthopedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAndrew Giles
Andrew Giles
NCN. Alex Corneman
N. Alex Corneman
SBSandeep Bhachu
Sandeep Bhachu
JRJohn F. Rudan
John F. Rudan
RERandy E. Ellis
Randy E. Ellis
GWGavin Wood
Gavin Wood
A subclinical form of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) can lead to subtle morphologic abnormalities, such as cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Femoroacetabular impingement is a mechanical hip abnormality that typically affects young populations and leads to hip pain and premature osteoarthritis. Imaging is critical to diagnosis, whether by radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, or computed tomography. The authors investigated the use of imaging to detect characteristics of subclinical SCFE and cam-type FAI in patients undergoing hip resurfacing. They retrospectively assessed computed tomography scans of 81 hips from 75 patients. Measurements were taken of the proximal femur and included the alpha angle, head-neck tilt, and anterior offset taken in both the conventional oblique axial plane and the radial plane. The cohort consisted of 68 men and 13 women with an average age of 52 years. Ninety percent of hips on the oblique axial view and 95% of hips on the radial view were found to have pathologically increased alpha angles. Negative correlations were found between the alpha angle and head-neck tilt and positive correlations between head-neck tilt and anterior offset ratio. Sixty percent and 68% of hips in the oblique axial and radial planes, respectively, were abnormal for the alpha angle, head-neck tilt, and anterior offset ratio, strongly suggesting SCFE morphology. This study’s results show similarity in morphology between cam-type FAI and SCFE, known precursors to osteoarthritis, in an early arthritic patient population.

11 January 2021 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAmit Atrey
Amit Atrey
AKAmir Khoshbin
Amir Khoshbin
MPMartin Paulsson
Martin Paulsson
DCDavid Campbell
David Campbell
GWGavin Wood
Gavin Wood
OGon behalf of the GAIA (Global Arthroplasty Infection Association) Registry Group
on behalf of the GAIA (Global Arthroplasty Infection Association) Registry Group

16 September 2016
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
GWGavin Wood
Gavin Wood
HAHamad Alshahrani
Hamad Alshahrani
MTMichel Taylor
Michel Taylor

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFernando Diaz Dilernia
Fernando Diaz Dilernia
MTMutaz Tageldein
Mutaz Tageldein
EAEmad Anam
Emad Anam
ACAaron Campbell
Aaron Campbell
GWGavin Wood
Gavin Wood
Background/Objectives: Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) replacement is a bone-preserving option for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis; however, reported survivorship and failure patterns remain variable. This study evaluated implant survivorship, functional outcomes, reoperations, and failure mechanisms following PFJ replacement using standard second-generation implant systems, with or without patellar resurfacing. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive cohort of 39 patients (48 knees) who underwent PFJ replacement for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis between 2011 and 2021. Median age at surgery was 59 years, and median body mass index (BMI) was 31 kg/m2. Median follow-up for clinical and revision surveillance was 9 years (IQR 8–10). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Scores (PCS and MCS). Implant survivorship was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methodology, with conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as the endpoint. Statistical analyses were primarily descriptive and exploratory because only five TKA revisions occurred. Results: Median OKS improved from 19 (IQR 16–24) preoperatively to 36 (IQR 24–42) at the latest follow-up, with a median paired improvement of 17 points. SF-12 PCS improved from 25 to 47, and SF-12 MCS from 36 to 55. Eight knees (16.7%) underwent non-revision reoperation, and five knees (10.4%) underwent conversion to TKA. All TKA revisions were performed for the progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Kaplan–Meier survivorship free from TKA revision was 89.6% at 9 years (95% CI 76.8–95.5). No clear difference in TKA-free survivorship was detected between resurfaced and non-resurfaced knees. Conclusions: PFJ replacement demonstrated substantial functional improvement and mid- to long-term survivorship comparable to published registry ranges in a selected cohort with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. TKA revision was uncommon and was attributable to the progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Because of the retrospective design, small cohort size, bilateral cases, and limited number of revision events, subgroup and risk-factor analyses should be interpreted as exploratory.

15 December 2025 in Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAayush R. Malhotra
Aayush R. Malhotra
GBGreg Borschneck
Greg Borschneck
GWGavin Wood
Gavin Wood
SMSteve Mann
Steve Mann