Background: Psychological distress is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, data quantifying this burden in Eastern European populations remains limited. Objectives: This study aimed to assess psychological distress—defined as anxiety, depressive symptoms, or perceived stress—and HRQoL among Romanian adults with DM compared with healthy controls, and to explore potential differences between diabetes subtypes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, including 400 adults (201 with DM and 199 healthy controls). Psychological distress was evaluated using the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y1, STAI-Y2), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Holmes–Rahe Stress Scale, while HRQoL was assessed using the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale. Group comparisons were performed using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests, with additional multivariable analyses adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. Results: Adults with diabetes exhibited significantly higher levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and perceived stress, and lower HRQoL, compared with controls (all p < 0.001). These differences remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index. Exploratory analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between diabetes subtypes, although subgroup comparisons were limited by sample size. Conclusions: Psychological distress is highly prevalent among Romanian adults with DM and is associated with poorer self-perceived health-related quality of life. The results support the relevance of incorporating systematic psychosocial assessment into routine diabetes care.

Background: Hypertension and psychological distress often coexist, though evidence from Eastern Europe is still limited. Stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy influence blood pressure control and treatment adherence. Their effect on hypertension prevention and treatment has not been systematically evaluated in Romania. Aim: This study evaluated the associations between stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy in Romanian adults with and without hypertension to identify modifiable psychological factors relevant for integrated cardiovascular management. Methods: A retrospective case–control study was conducted among 215 adults, including individuals with hypertension and normotensive controls. Participants completed validated questionnaires assessing stress vulnerability, perceived stress, state and trait anxiety, self-efficacy, and Type A behavior, together with demographic and occupational data. Results: Hypertensive participants reported higher stress vulnerability, perceived stress, and anxiety, as well as lower self-efficacy, compared with controls. Type A behavior showed no association with hypertension. These differences remained consistent after accounting for demographic characteristics. Conclusions: Hypertension in Romanian adults is associated with a distinct psycho-emotional profile characterized by elevated stress and anxiety and reduced self-efficacy. Type A personality showed no association. The results emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing modifiable psychological determinants in hypertension care. Integrating psychosocial assessment with personalized interventions, including mindfulness-based approaches, digital health support, and nurse-led telemonitoring, could improve treatment adherence, reduce emotional burden, and contribute to overall cardiovascular health. This region-specific evidence supports expanding hypertension management to include psychological care alongside standard medical approaches.

Background: Psychological distress has been frequently reported in individual autoimmune diseases, but evidence regarding shared psychological characteristics across heterogeneous autoimmune conditions remains limited. Objective: This study compared stress vulnerability, exposure to major life events, state and trait anxiety, and Type A behavioral characteristics between adults with autoimmune diseases and controls. Methods: This cross-sectional case–control study included 389 adults: 204 patients with autoimmune diseases and 185 controls. Participants completed the Stress Vulnerability Scale, Holmes–Rahe Life Stress Inventory, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Jenkins Activity Survey. Between-group differences, effect sizes, and correlations among psychometric variables were examined. Results: Patients with autoimmune diseases had significantly higher stress vulnerability scores (Cohen’s d = 0.39) and Holmes–Rahe life-event burden (d = 0.54) than controls. State anxiety (d = 0.52) and trait anxiety (d = 0.68) were also higher (all p < 0.001). Type A behavioral characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. State and trait anxiety showed the strongest correlation (r = 0.755, p < 0.001). Disease duration was positively associated with Holmes–Rahe scores but not with stress vulnerability or anxiety. Conclusions: Adults with autoimmune diseases showed a higher psychological burden across several complementary psychometric dimensions. These findings support consideration of psychological screening within multidisciplinary autoimmune disease care. Longitudinal and disease-specific studies integrating biological, psychological, and social factors are required to clarify temporal and potentially bidirectional relationships.