Microelectrode recording (MER) is commonly used to validate preoperative targeting during subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson’s Disease (PD). Although machine learning (ML) has been used to improve STN localization using MER data, the impact of preprocessing steps on the accuracy of classifiers has received little attention. We evaluated 24 distinct preprocessing pipelines combining four artifact removal strategies, three outlier handling methods, and optional feature normalization. The effect of each data processing procedure’s component of interest was evaluated in function of the performance obtained using three ML models. Artifact rejection methods (i.e., unsupervised variance-based algorithm (COV) and background noise estimation (BCK)), combined with optimized outlier management (i.e., statistical outlier identification per hemisphere (ORH)) consistently improved classification performance. In contrast, applying hemisphere-specific feature normalization prior to classification led to performance degradation across all metrics. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis, performed to determine feature importance across pipelines, revealed stable agreement with regard to influential features across diverse preprocessing configurations. In conclusion, optimal artifact rejection and outlier treatment are essential in preprocessing MER for STN identification in DBS, whereas preliminary feature normalization strategies may impair model performance. Overall, the best classification performance was obtained by applying the Random Forest model to the dataset treated using COV artifact rejection and ORH outlier management (accuracy = 0.945). SHAP-based interpretability offers valuable guidance for refining ML pipelines. These insights can inform robust protocol development for MER-guided DBS targeting.

Background/Objectives: Subcortical local field potentials (LFPs) provide a valuable in vivo window into the neurophysiology of the dystonia network. These signals can be recorded through Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) devices and combined with whole-head techniques such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) to study cortical–subcortical interactions. However, simultaneous LFP-MEG acquisition poses challenges, including interference from the DBS device and synchronization issues. We present preliminary data on the feasibility and signal quality of concurrent LFP and MEG recordings in dystonia patients. Methods: We assessed simultaneous MEG-LFP recordings in 11 patients with inherited or idiopathic dystonia who underwent bilateral DBS lead implantation in the Globus Pallidus Internus (GPi). Two synchronization strategies were tested: (1) the Tapping method, using an accelerometer placed on the DBS device, and (2) the Stimulation method, which generated detectable artifacts during sham stimulation. Results: Both methods successfully aligned MEG and LFP signals with a mean temporal delay of 91 ± 22 ms for the Tapping method and 288 ± 166 ms for the Stimulation method. Post-implantation signal-to-noise ratio analysis revealed slight degradation but no significant impact on MEG quality (gradiometers: −0.12 ± 1.85 dB; magnetometers: −0.47 ± 2.03 dB). Conclusions: Simultaneous MEG-LFP recordings in dystonic patients are feasible, yielding high-quality signals, and reliable synchronization. Temporal alignment improved with practice, suggesting a short learning curve. This method opens new opportunities to study cortical-subcortical dynamics and strengthens the potential of combining MEG-LFP approaches for investigating dystonia.