In the last years, operative laparoscopy became a standard approach in gynaecology and general surgery. Even in pregnancy its use is becoming more widely accepted. In fact, it offers advantages similar to those in no pregnant women, associated with good maternal and fetal outcomes. Around 0.2% of pregnant women require abdominal surgery. The most common indications of laparoscopy in pregnancy are cholelithiasis complications, appendicitis, persistent ovarian cyst and adnexal torsion. Authors describe a very rare case of acute abdomen due to isolated Fallopian tube torsion in a 24(th) weeks pregnant woman, managed by laparoscopic salpingectomy.

Background: Breast cancer remains the most diagnosed cancer in European countries, with diverse screening modalities requiring economic evaluation for optimal resource allocation. This systematic review evaluated the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening strategies across European healthcare contexts. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar following PRISMA guidelines (1990–2024). Studies were evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Economic standardization employed healthcare-specific inflation indices and purchasing power parity adjustments, with costs converted to 2020 EUR. Results: From 1449 studies, 23 met inclusion criteria, with significant geographic imbalance (74% from North-Western/Central Europe, 4% from South-Eastern Europe). Mammography screening for women aged 50–69 years demonstrated consistent cost-effectiveness (EUR 3000–8000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY)) with high confidence. For women under 50, screening showed substantially higher costs (EUR 105,000 per year of life saved). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening showed cost-effectiveness for high-risk populations (EUR 18,201–33,534 per QALY) with moderate confidence. Conclusions: Biennial mammography screening for women aged 50–69 demonstrates consistent cost-effectiveness across European contexts. Findings have highest applicability to North-Western and Central European healthcare systems, with limited generalizability to Southern and Eastern Europe due to evidence gaps.