Passive acoustic localization in complex shallow waters requires algorithms tailored to specific operational constraints. This paper investigates the adaptability, computational efficiency, and statistical performance boundaries of five matched-field processing (MFP) methods—Bartlett, Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR), Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC), Reduced Covariance Matrix (RCM), and Rank and Trace Minimization (RTM)—using the Elba-93 sea trial dataset. Error metrics and processing complexities are systematically evaluated across stationary and maneuvering target scenarios. Rigorous non-parametric statistical tests reveal distinct operational boundaries: under stationary conditions dominated by systemic environmental mismatch, energy-based processors guarantee reliable baseline stability. Conversely, under snapshot-deficient dynamic conditions tracking a receding target, standard high-resolution subspace methods become highly vulnerable to trajectory jumps. In such highly dynamic scenarios, adaptive energy-based processors (specifically MVDR) exhibit the most stable tracking continuity and lowest numerical peak errors. Simultaneously, the operational adaptability of subspace methods is improved via covariance matrix reconstruction (CMR). Specifically, the RCM technique effectively decouples unstructured sensor noise, mitigating maximum trajectory deviations and providing a balanced trade-off between computational efficiency and robustness. Statistical evaluations confirm the fundamental performance boundaries in static environments, while highlighting sample-size limitations in highly dynamic scenarios, thereby establishing a realistic, evidence-based benchmark for marine engineering applications.

Direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation is fundamental in array signal processing, yet classical algorithms suffer from significant performance degradation under low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions and require computationally intensive eigenvalue decomposition. This study presents a systematic comparative analysis of two backbone networks, a convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) for DOA estimation, addressing two critical research gaps: the lack of a mechanistic understanding of architecture-dependent performance under varying conditions and insufficient validation using real measured data. Both networks are trained using cross-spectral density matrices (CSDMs) from simulated uniform linear array (ULA) signals. Under baseline conditions (1° classification interval), both CNN and LSTM methods reach an accuracy (ACC) above 98%, in which the error is ±1° for CNN and ±2° for LSTM, only existing in the end-fire direction. Key findings reveal that LSTM maintains above 90% accuracy down to −20 dB SNR, demonstrating superior noise robustness, whereas CNN exhibits better angular resolution. Four performance boundaries are identified: optimal performance is achieved at half-wavelength element spacing; SNR crossover occurs at −20 dB below which accuracy drops sharply; the snapshot threshold of 32 marks the transition from snapshot-deficient to snapshot-sufficient conditions; the array size of 8 is the turning point for the performance variation rate. Comparative analysis against traditional methods demonstrates that deep learning approaches achieve superior resolution ability, batch processing efficiency, and noise robustness. Critically, models trained exclusively on single-target simulated data successfully generalize to multi-target experimental data from the Shallow Water Array Performance (SWAP) program, recovering primary target trajectories without domain adaptation. These results provide concrete engineering guidelines for architecture selection and validate the sim-to-real generalization capability of CSDM-based deep learning approaches in underwater acoustic environments.