Advances in cancer detection and treatment have substantially improved survival across many malignancies, increasing attention to long-term health outcomes and quality of life (QOL) (1,2). Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), often referred to colloquially as "chemobrain," may occur before, during, or after anticancer therapy and can affect multiple cognitive domains, including learning and memory, attention, processing speed, and executive function (3)(4)(5)(6). The severity, affected domains, and temporal trajectories vary considerably among individuals, indicating that CRCI is a heterogeneous rather than uniform or sequential process (3,4,6).Current CRCI assessment relies primarily on patient-reported symptoms and standardized neuropsychological testing, which provide complementary but not necessarily concordant information (4,5,7). Although essential for characterizing cognitive symptoms and performance, these approaches provide limited information about the underlying biological processes occurring within the brain. The biological basis of CRCI is multifactorial and may involve interacting inflammatory, metabolic, neurovascular, synaptic, and glial alterations resulting from cancer, host responses, individual susceptibility, and anticancer therapies (4,(8)(9)(10). These processes are difficult to assess directly and longitudinally in the living human brain, creating a need for minimally invasive approaches that can provide complementary molecular information.Circulating extracellular vesicle (EV) populations enriched for brain-associated cell markers represent one potential source of such information. Brain cells release EVs that can reach the peripheral circulation, and circulating EV populations associated with specific neural cell types are increasingly being investigated as blood-based sources of brain-related molecular information (11)(12)(13)(14). EV populations enriched using neuron-associated markers, commonly referred to as neuron-derived EVs (NDEs) (11)(12)(13), and those enriched using oligodendrocyteassociated markers, commonly referred to as oligodendrocyte-derived EVs (ODEs) (14), have been investigated as candidate sources of neuronal and oligodendroglial information, respectively. ODE measurements may provide information related to oligodendrocyte and myelin biology, whereas NDE measurements may provide complementary information regarding neuronal and synaptic processes. These approaches remain investigational, however, and require rigorous analytical and clinical validation, including evaluation of marker specificity, preanalytical variability, and potential systemic effects of cancer and its treatment on circulating EV profiles.In this Perspective, we discuss the clinical and biological complexity of CRCI and propose a conceptual framework for integrating brain-associated EV measurements with neuroimaging and cognitive assessments. Rather than proposing EVs as stand-alone diagnostic biomarkers, we consider their potential role as a complementary molecular component of longitudinal brain health monitoring in oncology.CRCI can substantially affect daily functioning, employment, medication management, independence, and QOL (2,3,7). Its clinical expression is heterogeneous, with variation in affected domains, onset, severity, and persistence across individuals (3,4,6), complicating identification of patients at increased risk and longitudinal assessment of cognitive trajectories.A major unmet need is the absence of an established framework for objective longitudinal assessment of the biological changes associated with CRCI. Unlike other treatmentrelated toxicities, such as cardiotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and myelosuppression, which can be monitored using established clinical, laboratory, and imaging-based measures, CRCI lacks comparable tools for routinely assessing underlying brain-related biological changes.Neuropsychological testing and patient-reported outcomes remain essential for characterizing cognitive performance and symptoms but may be constrained by time, expertise, repeated-testing effects, and limited scalability in routine oncology practice (5,7,15). Moreover, these approaches do not directly assess the molecular and cellular processes underlying CRCI. This gap highlights the need for minimally invasive molecular measures that can be obtained repeatedly across the cancer care continuum. Such measures could help define when brain-related biological changes emerge, how they relate to cognitive trajectories, and whether they persist or resolve after therapy. Ultimately, scalable biological measures integrated with cognitive assessment and other complementary approaches could facilitate investigation of individual risk, longitudinal recovery, and potential neuroprotective or rehabilitative interventions (2,7).The biological basis of CRCI is multifactorial, reflecting interacting effects of cancer, systemic host responses, individual susceptibility, and anticancer therapies rather than a single neurotoxic pathway. Proposed mechanisms include neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, blood-brain barrier and neurovascular dysfunction, impaired neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity, and oligodendrocyte and white matter injury (8)(9)(10)16) (Fig. 1). These processes may involve multiple cellular components of the brain, including neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, microglia, and cells of the neurovascular unit, and may disrupt cellular homeostasis, synaptic connectivity, myelination, and neural networks supporting memory, attention, processing speed, and executive function (8)(9)(10)16). Importantly, such alterations are not restricted to chemotherapy; cancer itself and other therapeutic modalities may contribute through overlapping biological pathways (9,10). Thus, CRCI may reflect heterogeneous and dynamic changes across multiple brain cellular compartments, providing a rationale for minimally invasive...