Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been utilized for critically ill patients, such as those with life-threatening respiratory failure or post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock. This study compares the predictive value of Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Organ System Failure (OSF) obtained on the first day of ECMO removal, and the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) stages obtained at 48 hours post-ECMO removal (AKIN_48-hour) in terms of hospital mortality for critically ill patients. This study reviewed the medical records of 119 critically ill patients successfully weaned from ECMO at the specialized intensive care unit of a tertiary-care university hospital between July 2006 and October 2010. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected retrospectively as survival predictors. Overall mortality rate was 26%. The most common condition requiring ECMO support was cardiogenic shock. By using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score displayed good discriminative power (AUROC 0.805±0.055, p<0.001). Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that daily urine output on the second day of ECMO removal (UO_{24–48 hour}), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and SOFA score on the day of ECMO removal were independent predictors of hospital mortality. Finally, cumulative survival rates at 6-month follow-up differed significantly (p13. Following successful ECMO weaning, the SOFA score proved a reproducible evaluation tool with good prognostic abilities.

It remains unclear whether infection events before entering end stage renal disease (ESRD) have a long-term negative impact on patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) who survive to permanent dialysis. We enrolled 62,872 patients with advanced CKD who transitioned to maintenance dialysis between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013. We used multivariable Cox as well as Fine and Gray models to determine the association of pre-dialysis infection exposure with all-cause mortality after starting dialysis. Compared with no infection during advanced CKD, the presence of infection exposure during that period was independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in the first year of dialysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–1.42) and also during the entire follow-up period (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.16–1.22). The increased risks of all-cause mortality increased incrementally with higher annual number of infections during advanced CKD. Similar results were found for all other adverse outcomes, e.g. post-ESRD infection-related hospitalization and major cardiac and cerebrovascular events. In conclusion, infection events during advanced CKD was associated with increased risks of adverse outcomes after dialysis has been started. Timely interventions in such a vulnerable group may help attenuate these risks.

Background Cirrhotic patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) have high mortality rates. The Chronic Liver Failure–Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF‐SOFA) score, a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, is a newly developed scoring system exclusively for patients with end‐stage liver disease. Aim To externally validate the efficacy of the CLIF‐SOFA score and evaluate other scoring systems for 6‐month mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients. Methods This study prospectively recorded and analysed the data for 30 demographical parameters and some clinical characteristic variables on day 1 of 250 cirrhotic patients admitted to a 10‐bed specialised hepatogastroenterology ICU in a 2000‐bed tertiary care referral hospital during the period from September 2010 to August 2013. Results The overall in‐hospital and 6‐month mortality rate were 58.8% (147/250) and 78.0% (195/250), respectively. Liver diseases were mostly attributed to hepatitis B virus infection (32%). Multiple Cox logistic regression hazard analysis revealed that Glasgow coma scale, both the CLIF‐SOFA and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III (ACPACHE III) scores determined on the first day of ICU admission were independent predictors of 6‐month mortality. Analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the CLIF‐SOFA score had the best discriminatory power (0.900 ± 0.020). Moreover, the cumulative 6‐month survival rates differed significantly for patients with a CLIF‐SOFA score ≤11 and those with a CLIF‐SOFA score >11 on the ICU admission day. Conclusion Both CLIF‐SOFA and APACHE III scores are excellent prognosis evaluation tools for critically ill cirrhotic patients.

Adults receiving dialysis have a higher mortality risk when infected with SARS-CoV-2 than do adults not receiving dialysis.^1,2 Because most clinical trials have not included people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD),^3,4 immunogenicity rates are instead assessed to determine the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this population. Several studies have reported that antibody response rates vary depending on vaccination protocols, vaccine types, and populations. Old age or use of immunosuppression medication have been identified as risk factors for vaccine nonresponse.^5-8 However, the immunogenicity rates of patients receiving dialysis have not yet been systematically reviewed, to our knowledge.