MicroRNAs are noncoding RNAs that inhibit the expression of their targets in a sequence-specific manner and play crucial roles during oncogenesis. Here we show that microRNA-7 (miR-7) inhibits p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) expression, a widely up-regulated signaling kinase in multiple human cancers, by targeting the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of Pak1 mRNA. We noticed an inverse correlation between the levels of endogenous miR-7 and Pak1 expression in human cancer cells. We discovered that endogenous miR-7 expression is positively regulated by a homeodomain transcription factor, HoxD10, the loss of which leads to an increased invasiveness. HoxD10 directly interacts with the miR-7 chromatin. Accordingly, the levels of Pak1 protein are progressively up-regulated whereas those of miR-7 and its upstream activator HoxD10 are progressively down-regulated in a cellular model of breast cancer progression from low to highly invasive phenotypes. Furthermore, HoxD10 expression in highly invasive breast cancer cells resulted in an increased miR-7 expression but reduced Pak1 3′-UTR-luciferase activity and reduced Pak1 protein. Finally, we show that miR-7 introduction inhibits the motility, invasiveness, anchorage-independent growth, and tumorigenic potential of highly invasive breast cancer cells. Collectively, these findings establish for the first time that Pak1 is a target of miR-7 and that HoxD10 plays a regulatory role in modifying the expression of miR-7 and, consequently, the functions of the miR-7-Pak1 pathway in human cancer cells. [Cancer Res 2008;68(20):8195–200]

The p21-activated kinase (PAK) family of serine/threonine kinases is important in physiological processes including motility, survival, mitosis, transcription and translation. PAKs are evolutionally conserved and widely expressed in a variety of tissues and are often overexpressed in multiple cancer types. Depending on structural and functional similarities, the six members of PAK family are divided into two groups with three members in each group. Group I PAKs are activated by extracellular signals through GTPase-dependent and GTPase-independent mechanisms. In contrast, group II PAKs are constitutively active. Over the years, accumulating data from tissue culture models and human tumors has increased our understanding about the biology of PAK family members. In this review, we have summarized the complex regulation of PAK and its downstream diverse myriads of effectors, which in turn are responsible for the biological effects of PAK family of kinases in cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial–mesenchymal transformations (EMT) are critical for the invasion, progression, and metastasis of epithelial carcinogenesis. The role of EMT in head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSC) tumorigenesis remains unexplored. In the current study, the expressions of several factors associated with the induction of EMT in HNSC cell lines and tumor specimens were investigated to define their functional and pathologic role in HNSC.METHODS: Eleven HNSC cell lines and 50 primary tumor tissue specimens formed the materials of this study. Western blot analysis as well as immunohistochemical, and functional techniques were used to assess the status of activated Src (p‐Src), E‐cadherin, and vimentin in both cell lines and tumor tissues and the results were correlated with patients' clinicopathologic parameters.RESULTS: The results demonstrated the inverse expression of p‐Src and E‐cadherin in the majority of cell lines and in primary tumor tissues compared with normal squamous mucosa. Elevated levels of p‐Src were accompanied by down‐regulation of E‐cadherin and the expression of vimentin in epithelial tumor cells. In vitro inhibition of Src led to E‐cadherin reexpression and increased cell contact in squamous carcinoma cell lines. Immunophenotypic analysis of these markers in primary tumor tissues demonstrated a significant correlation between increased p‐Src, decreased E‐cadherin, and vimentin expression and aggressive tumor features including penetrating invasive fronts, high‐grade sarcomatoid transformation, and lymph node metastasis.CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study indicate that Src and E‐cadherin may play an important role in EMT, invasion, and aggressive clinicopathologic features of HNSC. These proteins may be targeted for the therapeutic intervention of patients with HNSC. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

Background: p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) phosphorylates many proteins in both normal and transformed cells. Its ability to phosphorylate and thereby activate the estrogen receptor α (ERα) potentially limits the effectiveness of antiestrogen treatment in breast cancer. Here we studied associations between Pak1 expression and subcellular localization in tumor cells and tamoxifen resistance. Methods: Pak1 protein expression was evaluated in 403 primary breast tumors from premenopausal patients who had been randomly assigned to 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen or no treatment. Tamoxifen response was evaluated by comparing recurrence-free survival in relation to Pak1 and ERα expression in untreated versus tamoxifen-treated patients. Tamoxifen responsiveness of human MCF-7 breast cancer cells that inducibly expressed constitutively active Pak1 or that transiently overexpressed wild-type Pak1 (Wt-Pak1) or Pak1 that lacked functional nuclear localization signals (Pak1ΔNLS) was evaluated by analyzing cyclin D1 promoter activation and protein levels as markers for ERα activation. The response to tamoxifen in relation to Pak1 expression was analyzed in naturally tamoxifen-resistant Ishikawa human endometrial cancer cells. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Among patients who had ERα–positive tumors with low Pak1 expression, those treated with tamoxifen had better recurrence-free survival than those who received no treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.502, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.331 to 0.762; P = .001) whereas there was no difference in recurrence-free survival between treatment groups for patients whose tumors had high cytoplasmic (HR = 0.893, 95% CI = 0.420 to 1.901; P = .769) or any nuclear Pak1 expression (HR = 0.955, 95% CI = 0.405 to 2.250; P = .916). In MCF-7 cells, overexpression of Wt-Pak1, but not of Pak1ΔNLS, compromised tamoxifen response by stimulating cyclin D1 expression. Treatment of Ishikawa cells with tamoxifen led to an increase in the amount of nuclear Pak1 and Pak1 kinase activity, suggesting that tamoxifen, to some extent, regulates Pak1 expression. Conclusions: Our data support a role for Pak1, particular Pak1 localized to the nucleus, in ERα signaling and in tamoxifen resistance.

Here we define a function of metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1), a presumed corepressor of estrogen receptor α (ERα), as a transcriptional activator of Breast Cancer Amplified Sequence 3 (BCAS3), a gene amplified and overexpressed in breast cancers. We identified BCAS3 as a MTA1 chromatin target in a functional genomic screen. MTA1 stimulation of BCAS3 transcription required ERα and involved a functional ERE half-site in BCAS3 . Furthermore, we discovered that MTA1 is acetylated on lysine 626, and that this acetylation is necessary for a productive transcriptional recruitment of RNA polymerase II complex to the BCAS3 enhancer sequence. BCAS3 expression was elevated in mammary tumors from MTA1 transgenic mice and 60% of the human breast tumors, and correlated with the coexpression of MTA1 as well as with tumor grade and proliferation of primary breast tumor samples. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized function of MTA1 in stimulating BCAS3 expression and suggest an important role for MTA1-BCAS3 pathway in promoting cancerous phenotypes in breast tumor cells.

Here, we investigated the role of P21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) signaling in the function of estrogen receptor-α (ER-α) as assessed by serine 305 (S305) activation and transactivation activity of ER. We found that Pak1 overexpression interfered with the antiestrogenic action of tamoxifen upon the ER transactivation function in hormone-sensitive cells. In addition, tamoxifen stimulation led to up-regulation of ER target genes in breast cancer cells with increased Pak1 expression. Tamoxifen also increased Pak1-ER interaction in tamoxifen-resistant but not in tamoxifen-sensitive cells. Results from the mutational studies discovered a role of ER-S305 phosphorylation in triggering a subsequent phosphorylation of serine 118 (S118), and these effects were further potentiated by tamoxifen treatment. We found that S305 activation-linked ER transactivation function requires a functional S118, and active Pak1 signaling is required for a sustaining S118 phosphorylation of the endogenous ER. All of these events were positively influenced by tamoxifen and thus may contribute toward the loss of antiestrogenic effect of tamoxifen. These findings suggest that Pak1 signaling-dependent activation of ER-S305 leads to an enhanced S118 phosphorylation presumably due to a conformational change, and such structural modifications may participate in the development of tamoxifen resistance. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(3): 1694-701)