Penelope Jayne Allen

Prof. Dr. Penelope Jayne Allen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 August 2021 in Translational Vision Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMatthew A. Petoe
Matthew A. Petoe
STSamuel A. Titchener
Samuel A. Titchener
MKMaria Kolic
Maria Kolic
WKWilliam G. Kentler
William G. Kentler
CACarla J. Abbott
Carla J. Abbott
PAPenelope Jayne Allen
Penelope Jayne Allen
Purpose: To report the initial safety and efficacy results of a second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis at 56 weeks after device activation. Methods: Four subjects, with advanced retinitis pigmentosa and bare-light perception only, enrolled in a phase II trial (NCT03406416). A 44-channel electrode array was implanted in a suprachoroidal pocket. Device stability, efficacy, and adverse events were investigated at 12-week intervals. Results: All four subjects were implanted successfully and there were no device-related serious adverse events. Color fundus photography indicated a mild postoperative subretinal hemorrhage in two recipients, which cleared spontaneously within 2 weeks. Optical coherence tomography confirmed device stability and position under the macula. Screen-based localization accuracy was significantly better for all subjects with device on versus device off. Two subjects were significantly better with the device on in a motion discrimination task at 7, 15, and 30°/s and in a spatial discrimination task at 0.033 cycles per degree. All subjects were more accurate with the device on than device off at walking toward a target on a modified door task, localizing and touching tabletop objects, and detecting obstacles in an obstacle avoidance task. A positive effect of the implant on subjects’ daily lives was confirmed by an orientation and mobility assessor and subject self-report. Conclusions: These interim study data demonstrate that the suprachoroidal prosthesis is safe and provides significant improvements in functional vision, activities of daily living, and observer-rated quality of life. Translational Relevance: A suprachoroidal prosthesis can provide clinically useful artificial vision while maintaining a safe surgical profile.

19 June 2015 in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GKGeorge Yx Kong
George Yx Kong
RHRobert H Henderson
Robert H Henderson
SSSukhpal S Sandhu
Sukhpal S Sandhu
RERohan W Essex
Rohan W Essex
PAPenelope Jayne Allen
Penelope Jayne Allen
WCWilliam G Campbell
William G Campbell

1 October 2020 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJohn R. Rocke
John R. Rocke
MMMyra McGuinness
Myra McGuinness
WAWilliam K. Atkins
William K. Atkins
LFLewis Fry
Lewis Fry
JKJack X. Kane
Jack X. Kane
TEThomas L. Edwards
Thomas L. Edwards

2 November 2017 in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKEmil D Kurniawan
Emil D Kurniawan
JRJohn R Rocke
John R Rocke
SSSukhpal S Sandhu
Sukhpal S Sandhu
PAPenelope Jayne Allen
Penelope Jayne Allen

28 May 2024 in Ophthalmology Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMatthew A. Petoe
Matthew A. Petoe
CACarla J Abbott
Carla J Abbott
STSamuel A. Titchener
Samuel A. Titchener
MKMaria Kolic
Maria Kolic
WKWilliam G. Kentler
William G. Kentler
KYKiera A. Young
Kiera A. Young
To assess the feasibility of a second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis for provision of functional vision in recipients with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP) over 2.7 years. Prospective, single-arm, unmasked interventional clinical trial. Four participants, with advanced RP and bare-light perception vision. The 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis was implanted in the worse-seeing eye. Device stability, functionality, and adverse events were investigated at approximately 12-week intervals up to 140 weeks (2.7 years) postdevice activation. Serious adverse event (SAE) reporting, visual response outcomes, functional vision outcomes, and quality-of-life outcomes. All 4 participants (aged 39-66 years, 3 males) were successfully implanted in 2018, and there were no device-related SAEs over the duration of the study. A mild postoperative subretinal hemorrhage was detected in 2 recipients, which cleared spontaneously within 2 weeks. OCT confirmed device stability and position under the macula. Improvements in localization abilities were demonstrated for all 4 participants in screen-based, tabletop, and orientation and mobility tasks. In addition, 3 of 4 participants recorded improvements in motion discrimination and 2 of 4 participants recorded substantial improvements in spatial discrimination and identification of tabletop objects. Participants reported their unsupervised use of the device included exploring new environments, detecting people, and safely navigating around obstacles. A positive effect of the implant on participants' daily lives in their local environments was confirmed by an orientation and mobility assessor and participant self-report. Emotional well-being was not impacted by device implantation or usage. The completed clinical study demonstrates that the suprachoroidal prosthesis raises no safety concerns and provides improvements in functional vision, activities of daily living, and observer-rated quality of life. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

29 April 2020 in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLouis J. Stevenson
Louis J. Stevenson
RDRosie C. H. Dawkins
Rosie C. H. Dawkins
HSHarsha Sheorey
Harsha Sheorey
MMMyra McGuinness
Myra McGuinness
AHAndrew H. Hurley
Andrew H. Hurley
PAPenelope Jayne Allen
Penelope Jayne Allen