Cem Emir Guldogan

Prof. Dr. Cem Emir Guldogan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMurat Özgür Kılıç
Murat Özgür Kılıç
CGCem Emir Guldogan
Cem Emir Guldogan
IBİlHan Balamir
İlHan Balamir
MTMesut Tez
Mesut Tez

1 September 2019
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGCem Emir Guldogan
Cem Emir Guldogan
MKMurat Kendirci
Murat Kendirci
EGEmre Gundogdu
Emre Gundogdu
AYAhmet Cinar Yasti
Ahmet Cinar Yasti
Objective: Major burn injury is a type of trauma with high morbidity and mortality rates at all age groups. There is no consensus on the provided guidelines regarding the prediction of severity of the victims. Not being accessible to sophisticated clinical and blood monitoring in developing countries, it remains a challenge for them. The aim of the present study was to analyze the factors that have an effect on mortality and serve as a guide for burn treatment. Factors affecting mortality in major burn patients treated in a burn treatment center of a third step hospital with over 30% of burns of the total body surface area were evaluated, and parameters indicating severity were specifically determined. Material and Methods: Medical records and follow-up notes of patients hospitalized in Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital Burn Center between 2008 and 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Data on age, gender, comorbidities, burn percentage, locality, type of burn, process of the burn (suicide or accident), presence of inhalation injury, results of blood hemogram and biochemical tests, length of hospitalization, type of surgical procedures performed, presence of multitrauma, and ventilatory support requirement were analyzed to determine the factors affecting mortality. White blood cell count, hemoglobin count, platelet count, and lactate dehydrogenase level were examined at admission, at the middle of the clinical course, and at the end of treatment (at both exitus date or discharge date). Results: A total of 224 patients were hospitalized with burns >= 30% total body surface area. Of the 224 patients, 81.7% were males, and 18.4% were females. In the mortality group, 41.3% were males, and 58.5% were females. Gender (female, p<0.041), age (p60 years, p<0.001), total body surface area (p<0.001), type of burn (flame, p<0.002), presence of inhalation injury (p<0.001), process of the burn (p<0.002), time spent between the event and admission to the hospital (p<0.001), length of hospitalization (p<0.001), presence of comorbidity (p<0.038), diabetes mellitus (p<0.05), ventilation support (p<0.001), lactate dehydrogenase values (lactate dehydrogenaseadmission, p<0.001; lactate dehydrogenasemiddle, p<0.015; lactate dehydrogenaselast, p<0.001), white blood cell count (p<0.001), and platelet count (p<0.043) were found to be significant for univariate analyses. These parameters were further evaluated using multivariate analyses. Lactate dehydrogenaselast level (p<0.001), age (p<0.001), length of hospitalization (negative odds ratio), p<0.001), presence of inhalation injury (p<0.029), total body surface area burned (p<0.029), and leukocytosis (p<0.006) were found to be significantly associated with mortality; however, leukocytosis and length of hospitalization did not pose risk for mortality with regard to odds ratios. Conclusion: Early recognition of the factors affecting morbidity and mortality in patients and taking preventive measures, in addition to earlier detection and prevention of complications in long-time intensive care unit patients, could reduce complication and mortality rates in major burn trauma patients. Parameters for the indication of severity and mortality are important; however, lactate dehydrogenase is an easily studied parameter and is found to have a predictive value on prognosis.

28 July 2016 in Turkish Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ISIsa Sozen
Isa Sozen
CGCem Emir Guldogan
Cem Emir Guldogan
AYAhmet Cinar Yasti
Ahmet Cinar Yasti
Burns continue to be a devastating trauma worldwide. Most of the childhood burns are due to preventable injuries. Burns occurring as a result of negligence of the parents'/carers' may cause mortality or life-long morbidities. Identification of the etiologies will direct the precautions that should be undertaken. One hundred consequent burn patients admitted to our clinics were included to the study. A questionnaire was filled in with the information gathered from the parents/carers. The mean age of the patients was 3.74±3.07 years, and 52% was male. Most of the injuries occurred in the noon (median 12:45). Seventy-eight percent of the burns occurred at children's own home. Parents/carers were close enough to prevent the child from injury in 66% of the cases. While there was no first intervention in 21% of burns, 14% applied ice and 1% yoghurt. Taxi was the means to reaching the hospital in 45%. Hot liquids were the leading etiology (p<0.003). Sixty-two percent of the patients were dining at the living room and on the floor. The occurrence of the majority of injuries near parents/carers can be related to inadvertence or lack of awareness. To decrease burns incidence among children in our country, dining at the floor and stove heating should be avoided as much as possible. Not cooling the burn with running tap water at the time of injury leads to deepening of the burn, which consequently makes management more complex. Based on our study, there is an apparent need for determination of preventive measurements and to raise public awareness.

24 August 2013 in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSB. Saylam
B. Saylam
CGCem Emir Guldogan
Cem Emir Guldogan
FCF. Coşkun
F. Coşkun
VVVeli Vural
Veli Vural
BÇB. Çomçalı
B. Çomçalı
MTMesut Tez
Mesut Tez

1 January 2015 in Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ISİsA Sözen
İsA Sözen
CGCem Emir Guldogan
Cem Emir Guldogan
KKKemal Kismet
Kemal Kismet
MSMehmet Zafer Sabuncuoğlu
Mehmet Zafer Sabuncuoğlu
AYAhmet Çınar Yasti
Ahmet Çınar Yasti
This study aimed to determine the profile of burn patients presented in our polyclinic and evaluate the current status in comparison to the treatment methods of past series. Burn patients presented in the polyclinic in a one-year period were included into this prospective study. The records of all patients were examined in respect of gender, age, burn percentage, burn location, cause of burn, degree of burn, dressing material, number of dressings, type of treatment, place of trauma, and month of trauma. From a total of one thousand seven hundred and ninety-five patients presented, management was completed in the polyclinic for one thousand five hundred and eleven cases with a mean age of 27.9 years, with a female: male ratio of 0.88. While most patients were in the 18-64 age group, hot liquid burn was the leading cause in all age groups (p<0.05, p<0.001). Of the total patients, 89.6% were injured at home (p<0.001). The extremities were determined as the body area most often burned (p<0.001). While a single dressing was applied to 446 patients (29.5%), in 64.9% of cases polyclinic follow-up was terminated after the first 3 dressings. The mean number of dressings was greater in patients with deep dermal burns (mean 14.5, median 14, p<0.001). A higher incidence of burns was found due to increasing urban populations compared to previous years. Currently, the majority of patients are referred to a healthcare facilty near their residences for follow-up after a few dressings. Unneccessary presentation at specialist centres increases the workload of these centres and creates a burden of wasted time and transport expense for the patients. The application of current burn treatment principles in primary and secondary health facilities will reduce the workload of reference centres.

1 July 2020 in Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CGCem Emir Guldogan
Cem Emir Guldogan
OOOmer Vefik Ozozan
Omer Vefik Ozozan
MOMehmet Mahir Ozmen
Mehmet Mahir Ozmen
Initially sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was performed as an open procedure in 1988, known as Hess and Marceau’s technique, which is actually the first stage of the bilio-pancreatic diversion-duodenal switch (BPD-DS). It was proposed in 1993 as a single weight-loss procedure defined by Johnston, later known as operation Magenstrasse and Mill. In 1999 Gagner was the first to describe laparoscopic SG technique. Therefore SG became popular and one of the most common bariatric surgery procedure in the world. The method has many technical differences. Unfortunately, there is still no strict standardization of the method. With the development of technology, robotic surgery has taken its place in bariatric surgery field. A lot of new studies on robotic SG (RSG) have recently been published. Also there are several technical conflict, such as distance from the pylorus, resection of greater curvature, size of the antrum, use of bougie, fundus resection, whether or not reinforce the staple line, identification and repair of the hiatus. There are also some contraindications for SG. Barrett’s esophagus is a one of them. These variations in the technique affect the complications and effectiveness of surgery. In this study, we aimed to discuss the development and modifications of SG steps of with the current literature review.