Gholamreza Oskrochi

Prof. Dr. Gholamreza Oskrochi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in Preventive Medicine Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YDYetunde Marion Dairo
Yetunde Marion Dairo
JCJohnny Collett
Johnny Collett
HDHelen Dawes
Helen Dawes
GOGholamreza Oskrochi
Gholamreza Oskrochi
Despite evidence that inactivity is a major factor causing ill health in people with intellectual disabilities (pwID) there are gaps in our knowledge of their physical activity (PA). To date, there is no published systematic review of their PA levels. Therefore, we performed a systematic review from January-October 2015, comprising studies from across the globe to establish PA levels, determine how they were measured, and what factors influenced PA in adults with intellectual disabilities (awID). Five databases were searched. Studies were included if written in English, peer-reviewed, had primary research data, and measured PA levels of awID. Quality was assessed using a 19-item checklist. Meta-summary of the findings was performed and a meta-analysis of factors influencing PA using multiple regression. Fifteen studies were included consisting of 3159 awID, aged 16-81 years, 54% male and 46% female. Only 9% of participants achieved minimum PA guidelines. PA levels were measured using objective and subjective methods. ID severity, living in care, gender, and age were independently significantly correlated with the number of participants achieving PA guidelines with the strongest predictor being ID severity (Beta 0.631, p < 0.001). Findings should be in the context that most of the participants were in the mild/moderate range of ID severity and none of the studies objectively measured PA in people with profound ID. To inform measurement and intervention design for improved PA, we recommend that there is an urgent need for future PA studies in awID population to include all disability severity levels. PROSPERO registration number CRD42015016675.

13 June 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GOGholamreza Oskrochi
Gholamreza Oskrochi
Ahmed Bani MustafaAhmed Bani Mustafa
Ahmed Bani Mustafa
YOY Oskrochi
Y Oskrochi
Financial status is thought to be an important determinant of psychological well-being. We investigate this relationship, and the effect of other factors, using a parametric mixed modelling approach for panel data, controlling the problem of unobservable heterogeneity. Two nationally representative surveys, the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) and the Understanding Society Survey (USS), were used to construct a unified data set which measured psychological well-being and associated factors using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). The GHQ-12 score for the head of the household was used as the dependant variable and its relationship with multiple independent demographic and financial status variables was investigated. Following assessment of growth curve characteristics with linear, curvilinear and higher-order polynomial modelling; several variance-covariance structures were tested to assess the error covariance structure of the longitudinal data. The random intercept and random slope were allowed to vary across participants, and methods such as natural splines and B-splines were used to improve the fit of some variables. Our final model demonstrated the most important variables affecting self-reported psychological well-being, as determined by GHQ-12, were perception and expectation of future financial situation and problems meeting household expenditure. Gender, age, marital status, number of children at home, highest qualification and job status were also significantly implicated. Unlike previous studies however we did not find that size of income was significant. These results provide further strong evidence of the impact that financial concerns have on self-reported measures of psychological well-being.

23 February 2026 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GOGholamreza Oskrochi
Gholamreza Oskrochi
YOYoussof Oskrochi
Youssof Oskrochi
RERogheyeh Eskrootchi
Rogheyeh Eskrootchi
Many factors, such as health, marital status, social relationships, and job status, influence psychological wellbeing. Previous research has suggested that educational attainment is also a key contributor to a happier life. Utilising data from the Understanding Society survey (2010 -2018), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the direct and indirect effects of education on psychological wellbeing of 68,283 individuals in the UK. After controlling for relevant variables, we identified a direct association between educational attainment and psychological wellbeing. This aligns with earlier studies examining the link between education and happiness. While some of these studies report significant positive relationships, our results underscore the complexity of factors influencing psychological wellbeing, extending beyond education alone.

27 July 2023 in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Hassan AshktorabHassan Ashktorab
Hassan Ashktorab
GOGholamreza Oskrochi
Gholamreza Oskrochi
SCSuryanarayana Reddy Challa
Suryanarayana Reddy Challa
LCLakshmi G. Chirumamilla
Lakshmi G. Chirumamilla
FAFaezeh Ahangarzadeh
Faezeh Ahangarzadeh
Hassan BrimHassan Brim
Hassan Brim

8 August 2023 in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Hassan AshktorabHassan Ashktorab
Hassan Ashktorab
GOGholamreza Oskrochi
Gholamreza Oskrochi
SCSuryanarayana Reddy Challa
Suryanarayana Reddy Challa
LCLakshmi G. Chirumamilla
Lakshmi G. Chirumamilla
FAFaezeh Ahangarzadeh
Faezeh Ahangarzadeh
Hassan BrimHassan Brim
Hassan Brim