Margarita Martín

Dr. Margarita Martín

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlicia Marín
Alicia Marín
MMMargarita Martín
Margarita Martín
OLOlga Liñán
Olga Liñán
FAFelipe Alvarenga
Felipe Alvarenga
MLMario López
Mario López
LCLaura Cerezo
Laura Cerezo
Radiation-induced bystander effects are defined as biological effects expressed after irradiation by cells whose nuclei have not been directly irradiated. These effects include DNA damage, chromosomal instability, mutation, and apoptosis. There is considerable evidence that ionizing radiation affects cells located near the site of irradiation, which respond individually and collectively as part of a large interconnected web. These bystander signals can alter the dynamic equilibrium between proliferation, apoptosis, quiescence or differentiation. The aim of this review is to examine the most important biological effects of this phenomenon with regard to areas of major interest in radiotherapy. Such aspects include radiation-induced bystander effects during the cell cycle under hypoxic conditions when administering fractionated modalities or combined radio-chemotherapy. Other relevant aspects include individual variation and genetics in toxicity of bystander factors and normal tissue collateral damage. In advanced radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the high degree of dose conformity to the target volume reduces the dose and, therefore, the risk of complications, to normal tissues. However, significant doses can accumulate out-of-field due to photon scattering and this may impact cellular response in these regions. Protons may offer a solution to reduce out-of-field doses. The bystander effect has numerous associated phenomena, including adaptive response, genomic instability, and abscopal effects. Also, the bystander effect can influence radiation protection and oxidative stress. It is essential that we understand the mechanisms underlying the bystander effect in order to more accurately assess radiation risk and to evaluate protocols for cancer radiotherapy.

1 October 2006 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EOEnis Ozyar
Enis Ozyar
USUgur Selek
Ugur Selek
SLSiddihartha Laskar
Siddihartha Laskar
OUOmer Uzel
Omer Uzel
YAYavuz Anacak
Yavuz Anacak
IAIbtisam Lale Atahan
Ibtisam Lale Atahan


1 August 2010 in Clinical and Translational Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMario López Rodríguez
Mario López Rodríguez
MMMargarita Martín
Margarita Martín
LPLaura Cerezo Padellano
Laura Cerezo Padellano
APAlicia Marín Palomo
Alicia Marín Palomo
YPYamile Ibáñez Puebla
Yamile Ibáñez Puebla

1 September 2009 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLaura Cerezo
Laura Cerezo
MMMargarita Martín
Margarita Martín
MLMario López
Mario López
AMAlicia Marín
Alicia Marín
AGAlberto Gómez
Alberto Gómez
In head and neck cancer, bilateral neck irradiation is the standard approach for many tumor locations and stages. Increasing knowledge on the pattern of nodal invasion leads to more precise targeting and normal tissue sparing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the morbidity and tumor control for patients with well lateralized squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx treated with ipsilateral radiotherapy.

25 April 2013 in Head & Neck
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LCLaura Cerezo
Laura Cerezo
CLConsuelo López
Consuelo López
ATAlejandro de la Torre
Alejandro de la Torre
DSDolores Suárez
Dolores Suárez
AHAsunción Hervás-Morón
Asunción Hervás-Morón
PSPilar Sandoval
Pilar Sandoval