ravi vadlamani

ravi vadlamani

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in Knowledge-Based Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BKB. Shravan Kumar
B. Shravan Kumar
RVravi vadlamani
ravi vadlamani


26 May 2007 in Journal of Systems and Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NKN. Raj Kiran
N. Raj Kiran
RVravi vadlamani
ravi vadlamani


1 November 2018 in Computers & Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDadabada Pradeepkumar
Dadabada Pradeepkumar
RVravi vadlamani
ravi vadlamani

7 November 2020 in SN Computer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTanveerulhuq Shaik
Tanveerulhuq Shaik
RVravi vadlamani
ravi vadlamani
Kalyanmoy DebKalyanmoy Deb
Kalyanmoy Deb
Most optimization-based community detection approaches formulate the problem in a single- or bi-objective framework. In this paper, we propose two variants of a three-objective function optimization formulation using a customized non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III) to find community structures in a network. The first variant, named NSGA-III-KRM, considered Kernel k-means, ratio cut, and modularity, as three objective functions; whereas the second variant, named NSGA-III-CCM, considers community score, community fitness and modularity, as three objective functions. Experiments are conducted on four benchmark network datasets. Comparison with state-of-the-art and baseline methods along with decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm variants (MOEA/D-KRM and MOEA/D-CCM) indicates that the proposed variants yield comparable or better results. This is particularly significant because the addition of the third objective does not worsen the results of the other two objectives. We also propose a simple method to rank the Pareto solutions obtained by proposing a new measure—the ratio of the hyper-volume and inverted generational distance. The higher the ratio, the better is the Pareto set. This strategy is particularly useful in the absence of empirical attainment function in the multi-objective framework, where the number of objectives is more than two.